The Western Union Telegraph Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 14, 194239 N.L.R.B. 787 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY and COMMERCIAL TELEGRAPHERS' UNION, WESTERN UNION LOCAL 144 Case No. R-3570.-Decided March 14, 1942 Jurisdiction : telegraph communications industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question : refusal of Company to accord union recognition until certified by the Board ; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all employees at the metropolitan Akron, Ohio, offices of the Company, excluding the superintendent, manager .of delivery department, commercial representative, chief operator, night chief operator, confidential clerk to chief operator, telephone supervisor, automatic supervisor, and city foreman.' Mr. Ramey Donovan, for the Board. Mr. Edwin C. Ziesel, of Chicago, Ill., for the Company. Mr. Hugh C. McKenny, of Washington, D. C., for the Union. Mr. Louis Cokin, of counsel to the Board. DECISION 'AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On December 24, 1941, Commercial Telegraphers' Union, Western Union Local 144, herein called ,the Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Eighth Region (Cleveland, Ohio) a petition alleg- ing that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of The Western Union Telegraph Com- pany, Akron, Ohio, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 419, herein called the Act. On February 13, 1942, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. 39 N. L. R. B., No. 150. - - ' 787 788 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD On February 17, 1942, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company and the Union, and upon American Communications Association. Pur- suant to notice, a hearing was held on February 24, 1942, at Akron, Ohio, before Webster Powell, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Board, the Company, and the Union were represented and participated in the, hearing. Amer- ican Communications Association did not appear at the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. The Trial Examiner granted a motion of the Union during the hearing to amend its petition as to formal matters. During the' course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on other motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed these rulings and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following. FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS' OF THE COMPANY The Western Union Telegraph Company is a New' York cor- poration with its principal office at New York City. It is engaged throughout the United States and in various foreign countries in the receiving and transmission by telegraph and cable of intrastate, interstate, and international communications. At the close of 1940, the Company employed approximately 43,500 persons. The Com- pany maintains offices at Akron, Ohio, with which we are here " concerned. H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Commercial Telegraphers' Union, Western Union Local 144, is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees at the Akron, Ohio, offices of'the Company. - III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company refuses to recognize the Union until such time as it is certified by the Board. A statement of a Field Examiner of the Board, introduced into evidence at the hearing, shows that the Union represents a substantial number of employees in the alleged appro- priate unit.' 1 The Field Examiner reported that the Union presented 41 authorization cards bearing the signatures of persons who appear on a pay roll of the Company . There are approxi- mately 96 employees in the alleged appropriate unit. - THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY 789 We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union urges that all employees at the metropolitan Akron, Ohio, offices of the Company, excluding the superintendent, manager of delivery department, commercial representative, chief operator, night chief operator, confidential clerk to chief operator, telephone supervisor, automatic supervisor, and city foreman, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining. The Com- pany stated that although it considered a nation-wide unit appro- priate, it ordinarily had no objection to the setting up of divisional cities as separate bargaining units. Akron, Ohio, is designated by the Company as a divisional city. The Company- stated, however, that although Akron is a divisional office, because of its small num- ber of employees it should be included in_ a district unit rather than be set up as a separate bargaining unit. A divisional office is a homogenous unit in the Company's organ- izational setup. A divisional office is not connected functionally in any way with the district offices of the Company and is under sep- arate supervision. We believe that the purposes of the Act can best be effectuated by establishing bargaining units which will conform to the Company's operational units. We find that employees at the divisional office of Akron, Ohio, should be set up as a separate appro- priate bargaining unit. The Company stated that it had no objec- tion to the exclusions requested by the Union. We find that all employees at the metropolitan Akron, Ohio, offices of the Company, excluding the superintendent, manager of delivery department, commercial representative, -chief operator, night chief operator, confidential clerk to chief operator, telephone supervisor, automatic supervisor, and city foreman, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining and that such unit will insure to the employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise will effectuate the policies of the Act. 790 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot. We find that the employees of the Company eligible to vote in the election shall be those within the appropriate unit who were em- ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and addi- tions set forth in the Direction. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of The Western Union Telegraph Company, Akron, Ohio, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 2. All employees at the metropolitan Akron, Ohio, offices of the Company, excluding the superintendent, manager of delivery depart- ment, commercial representative, chief operator, night chief operator, confidential clerk to chief operator, telephone supervisor, automatic supervisor, and city foreman, constitute a unit appropriate for the pur- poses of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby - DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation ordered by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with The Western Union Telegraph Company, Akron, Ohio, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighth Region,' acting in this matter as agent for the National- Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all employees at the metropolitan Akron, Ohio, offices of the Company who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service THE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY 791 or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but exclud- ing the superintendent, manager of delivery department, commer- cial representative, chief operator, night chief operator, confidential clerk to chief operator, telephone supervisor, automatic supervisor, city foreman, and employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Commercial Telegraphers' Union, Western Union Local 144, affili- ated with the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining. Mx. Wiz. M. LEisERsoN took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation