The Oliver Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 18, 194772 N.L.R.B. 841 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of THE OLIVER CORP., EMPLOYER and INDEPENDENT CLERICAL ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER Case No. 13-R-3507.Decided February 18, 1947 Messrs. John S. Farabaugh and R. L. Anton, of South Bend, Ind., for the Employer. Mr. Dennis S. Andrysiak , of South Bend , Ind., for the Petitioner. Messrs. Oliver F. Switzer and Marvel Raker, of South Bend, Ind., for the United. Mr. Jerome Wohlrzuth , of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at South Bend, Indiana, on November 18, 1946, before Gustaf B. Erickson, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER The Oliver Corp. is a Delaware corporation engaged in the manu- facture and sale of farm equipment, and other products. The Em- ployer operates several other plants, but Plant No. 1 in South Bend, Indiana, is the only one involved herein: During the year 1946, the Employer purchased raw materials valued at more than $2,500,000 for its South Bend plant, approximately 50 percent of which was shipped from points outside the State of Indiana. During the same period, finished products valued at $5,000,000, were manufactured at the plant in question, approximately 50 percent of which was shipped to points outside the State of Indiana. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce• within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 72 N. L. R. B, No. 136 841 842 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD H. TIIE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization claiming to represent em- ployees of the Employer. The United Farm Equipment and Metal Workers of America, herein called Intervenor , is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations , claiming to represent employees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On February 20, 1946, Petitioner requested recognition of the Em- ployer as the bargaining representative of certain of its employees- The Employer 'refused to grant such recognition until the Petitioner had been certified by the Board. On or about March 6, 1946, the petition was filed herein. The Intervenor contends that its present contract with the Em- ployer, dated March 22, 1946, and automatically renewable from year to year, constitutes a bar to this proceeding.' However, inasmuch as the contract may be terminated in less than 2 months upon 30 days' notice by either party thereto, we find that it does not bar a determination of representatives within the next (30) days pursuant to our usual Direction of Election.2 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the mean- ing of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.3 IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find that all office and clerical employees of South Beiid Plant No. 1, employed in the General Administrative Office, Accounting and Cost Division, Methods and Standards Department, Production Department, Purchasing Department, Sales Order and Billing De- partment, Service Department, and Foundry Division, including all employees listed in Appendices A, B, and C, inventory supervisors, senior shipping clerk, senior receiving clerks, checker and unloading clerk, accounts payable supervisor, stores order department super- 1 The Intervenor was certified by the Board in 1944 as the bargaining representative of the Employer's office and clerical employees (53 N L R. B. 1078). 2 Matter of Ellis Canning Company, 67 N L R. B. 384 1 In view of our finding above, we need not determine the applicability of the principle- enunicated in Matter of Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co (50 N L R B 306), which the Intervenor urged in support of its position that the contract precluded a present determina- tion of representatives. THE OLIVER CORP. 843 visor, cashier-bookkeeper, head process clerk, senior and junior process clerks, time-study rate clerk, senior and junior timekeepers, con- trolled material analyst, assistant manager of the service department, senior jobbing order clerk, pricing department supervisor, account- ant- (returned goods), senior billing clerk, head specification clerk, senior specification clerk, assistant purchasing agents, production sec- tion heads, production schedule clerk, and quota and shipping clerk, but excluding employees at Plant No. 2 who are not on the pay roll of Plant No. 1, all employees listed in Appendix D, senior accountant in pay-roll department, assistant time-study supervisor, time-study men, assistant supervisor in the Sales Order Department, Billing De- partment supervisor, assistant production supervisors, and all or any other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, dis- charge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of enn- ployees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit ap- propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the mean- ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act.4 DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur- poses of collective bargaining with The Oliver Corp., South Bend, Indiana an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as pos- sible, but not later than thirty (36) clays from the date of this Direc- tion, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eleventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Bard Riles and Regulations-Series 4, among-the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately pre- ceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but exclud- ing those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, t o determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Independ- ent Clerical Association or by United Farm Equipment and Metal Workers of America, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. a This is substantially the came unit as that for which the Intervenor was certified in 1944 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation