The Jaeger Machine Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jul 26, 1944

57 N.L.R.B. 695 (N.L.R.B. 1944)

In the Matter of THE JAEGER MACHINE COMPANY ,and UNITE D` STEEL-
WORIKERS OF AMERICA `(CIO)
Case No. 9-R-1459.-Decided July 26, 1944
Mr. George E. Landis, of Columbus, Ohio, and Mr. Thomas Veach,
of Cleveland, Ohio, for the Company.
Messrs. Jacob Clayman and Howard N. Porter, of Columbus, Ohio,
for the U. S. A.
Miss Ruth Rusch, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon it petition duly filed by United Steelworkers of America,
(CIO), herein called the U. S. A., alleging that. a question affecting
commerce had- arisen concerning the representation of employees of
The Jaeger Machine Company, Columbus, Ohio, herein called the
Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an ap-
propriate hearing upon due-notice before James A. Shaw, Trial Ex-
aminer. Said hearing was held at-Columbus, Ohio, on June 23, 1944.
The Company and the- U. S. A. appeared and participated.- All
parties were afforded full opportunity, to be heard, to examine and
cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the
issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free
from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were. af-
forded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
The Jaeger Machine Company is an Ohio corporation with its only
plant located in Columbus, Ohio. The Company is engaged in making
. I The International Molders & Foundry Workers Union, A. F. of L., Local 98 , also served
with notice , did not appear and took no part in the proceedings.
57 N. L. R. B., No. 113.
695
696 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
invasion equipment for the United States Armed Services. Duiing
1943, the Company purchased raw materials, which consisted of pri-
mary steel plates, sheets and structural steel, steel castings and bars,
and gasoline' engines and transmissions, amounting to more than
$4,000,000 in value, of which 50 percent was obtained from sources out-
side the State of Ohio. For the same period, the Company produced
finished goods amounting in value to approximately $7,000,000, of
which 50 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Ohio.
The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the
meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
United Steelworkers of America, affiliated with the Congress of
Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to mem-
bership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On June 2, 1944, the U. S. A. asked the Company for recognition as
the bargaining representative of its employees. The Company refused
on the ground that a contract with another labor organization was a
bar to such recognition. -
On April 1, 1942, the Company'entered into a bargaining contract
with International Molders and Foundry Workers Union of North
America, Local '98, therein called the Molders, covering employees in
the 'foundry, but excluding' employees in -other departments of the
plant. The contract provided that it should remain in operation for
1 year,and from year to year thereafter unless notice was served -by
either, party upon the other 30idays prior to the-end of any contract
year. -No'such notice having been given, the Company contends that
the contract is still in force and constitutes a-bar to- an election at-this
-,time. '
About November 15, 1942, in order to maintain the production-of
invasion equipment, the Company discontinued its foundry so that.'it
could enlarge the machine shop. As the foundry work ceased, the
Company placed about 25 percent of the foundry workers -in its other
departments and placed the remaining employees in foundries of other
employers in and -around Columbus., Since -November 15, 1942, the
Company.has had no meetings or negotiations with any members or
officials of the Molders and that organization asserts no interest in
representing ,the employees involved in this proceeding. 'It is thus
evident that the contract is not in effect and that the Company's em-
ployees are without a bargaining representative at this time. Under
these circumstances, we find that the contract between the Company
THE JAEGER MACHINE. COMPANY 69,7
and the Molders does. not, constitute a, bar to a present determination
of representatives: '
A statement, of a Field Examiner introduced into evidence- at, the
hearing, indicates that the U. S. A. represents a, substantial: number
of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate 2
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the
representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of
Section 9,(c). and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
We find in accordance with the stipulation of the parties and 'the
record, that all employees of the Company, excluding guards, engi-
neers, time-study men, expediters, all clerical, salaried, and' confiden-'
tial employees, and further excluding foremen, assistant foremen, and,
all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote,' dis-`
charge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of em-
ployees, or effectively recommend such action,3 constitute a unit ap-
propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning
of Section 9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question-concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election' by secret ballot among the
employees-in' the appropriate unit who were employed during the
pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of
Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in
-the •Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to they power vested in the National
Labor Relations, Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act, and pursuant- to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is
hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
'tives for the purposes of collective' bargaining with The Jaeger
Machine Company, Columbus,,Ohio, an election by secret ballot shall
'be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days
'The Field Examiner reported that the U. S. A. submitted 282 membership cards, bearing
dates between October 1943 and May 1944. There are 576 employees in the appropriate
unit.
' At'the hearing,- the Company and the U. S . A. agreed, and the record shows, that certain
hourly-paid set-up men and group leaders in the Company's employ are not supervisory
employees and are included in the unit.
698 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
from -the date of this Direction , under the direction and supervision
of the Regional Director for the Ninth Region , acting in this matter
as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to
Article III, Sections 10 and 11 , of said Rules and Regulations; among
the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above,
who were employed - during the pay-roll period immediately preceding
the date ofthis Direction; - including employees ; who did- =not - work
during the said pay-roll period because they were ill: or - on -vacation
or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the , armed forces
of the United- States who present' themselves in person at the polls,
but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged
for 'cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to . the date
of the election , to determine whether or not they , desire to be repre-.
sented by , United . Steelworkers of America , CIO,- for the purposes
of collective bargaining. .
MR. JOHN M. HOUSTON - took no part in the consideration of the
above Decision and Direction of Election.
4