The Grabler Manufacturing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 20, 194457 N.L.R.B. 481 (N.L.R.B. 1944) Copy Citation III the Matter of THE GRABI ,ER MANUFACTURING COMPANY and INTER- N ATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FIREMEN AND OILERS , LOCAL 52 ( AFL) Case No. 8-R-1519.Decided July 20, 1944 Messrs. William C. Lindquist and-D . J. McEvoy , of Cleveland, Ohio, for the Company. Mr.'Norinan F . Driscoll , of Cleveland , Ohio, for the AFL. Messrs. Frank J. Lentz and Eugene Hagler, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the CIO. Mr. Joseph E. Gubbins, of counsel' to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by International Brotherhood of Fire- men and Oilers, Local 52, affiliated with the A. F. of L., herein called the AFL, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen con- cerning the representation of employees of The,Grabler Manufac- turing Company,' Cleveland, Ohio, herein called the Company,•the National Labor Relatiolis Board provided for an ,appropriate hearing upon due notice before Frank L. Danello, Trial Examiner. Said hear- ing was held at Cleveland, Ohio, on June 19, 1944. The Company, the AFL, and United Steelworkers of America, Local '#1309, affili-' ated with the C..I. O., herein culled the CIO, appeared and partici- pated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to -introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Grabler Manufacturing Company, an Ohio corporation, is engaged at Cleveland, Ohio, in, the manufacture of pipe fitting and 57 N. L. R. B., No. 87. 601248-45-vol 57-32 481 482 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD related parts. During" the year 1943, the Company purchased raw materials valued in excess of $700,000 for use at its Cleveland plant, approximately 50 percent of which was shipped from points outside the State of Ohio. During the same period, the value of the products finished at its Cleveland plant exceeded $5,000,000 in' value, approxi ' mately 50 percent of Ywhich was shipped to points outside the State. of Ohio. ' The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.; t ' II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED •1 International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Eocal 52, affiil iated with the American Federatioli of Labor, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees ofthe Company. United Steelworkers of America, Local $k 1309, affiliated with the - C 11 Congress of Industrial Organizations'is, a labor organization, admit- ting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company refuses to recognize the AFL as the bargaining rep- resentative of the firemen ' in the boiler room of its Cleveland plant unless arid until the AFL is ,certified by the Board. A statement prepared by a Field 'Examiner, introduced into evi- dence-,at the hearing, indicates that the AFL represents all the em-' ployees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.) ' We find that,a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV: THE "APPROPRIATEPPROPRIATE UNIT - a The AFL contends -that all firemen in. the boiler 'room of the Com-, pany's Cleveland plant, excluding the engineer, and the. part-time laborer, constitute an appropriate unit. The Company and the CIO contend that a plant-wide unit is appropriate. Since 1937, the Company and the CIO have been bound by a series of 1-year collective bargaining contracts covering the Company's-pro- ductio'n- and maintenance employees, excluding inter alia, firemen.2 The only apparent-reason for the Company's contention for a plant- wide unit is its desire to eliminate the possible necessity, of negotiating 'The Field Examiner's statement shows that the AFL submitted three : designation cards which bear names of persons listed on the Company's pay roll of May.8, 1944. There are three employees iri the unit alleged by the AFL to be appropriate. 2 The last contract between the Company and the CIO expired on May 1,,1944.. THE GRABLER, MANUFACTURING COMPANY. 483 with more than one bargaining repiesentatisse. The CIO asserts that, a separate unit of firemen is inappropriate; particularlydn view of the history ,of plant-wide bargaining since 1937. However, at, no time prior to the instant proceeding was the propriety of such -a, unit. in issue. Moreover, as shown above, the CIO has never represented the firemen during the entire period of its contractual' relations with the Company. The boiler room is' isolated from the rest of the Cleveland plant's operations. The three firemen operate the boiler under the super- vision of the engineer, check the fire, clean the grates, adjust the water pumps, and maintain proper steam pressure. In addition, the fire- men working on the second and third shifts are required every 30 minutes to check the ADT system which is located near the boiler room. This system is used to report burglaries, fire, sabotage, or any other emergency that may arise. - The employees involved are licensed- firemen. In view.of the foregoing facts and since the duties of the firemen require skills not possessed by the remaining employees of the Cleveland plant, we are of the opinion that they are sufficiently ' iden- -tifiable and distinguishable to warrant establishment as a , separate unit. The parties agree, and we find, that the engineer is a supervisory employee and should be excluded from the unit. With respect to the part-time laborer in the boiler'room whose ex- clusion is sought by the AFL, the record shows that he is actually classified as a cupola man. He spends approximately 50 percent of his time performing the functions associated with his classification, and the remainder of his time is spent shoveling coal in the boiler room. The Company and the CIO take no position as to the exclusion or in- clusion of this employee. Inasmuch as it appears that the classification of this employee is that of a production worker and his interests are akin to those of production employees, we shall exclude him from the unit., We find that all 'firemen in the boiler room of the Company's Cleve- land plant, excluding the part-tiine laborer, the engineer, and all other-, supervisory employees who have authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The AFL has submitted evidence to indicate that it represents all employees in the appropriate unit who were employed by the Company at the time of the hearing. Since the CIO has not in the'past served a 4 484 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD as the bargaining representative of employees in the appropriate unit,, and since it has not presented any evidence of'•representation among them, we shill make no provision for its 'participation in the election hereinafter directed. We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by,an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the-limitations and-additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article Ill, ' Section - 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby. - DIRECTED that ,. as part of investigation to ascertain representatives for the ,purposes of collective bargaining with The Grabler Manu- facturing Company, Cleveland , Ohio, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible , but not later than thirty (30) days ,from the date of this Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighth Region, acting in this, matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations; among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off , and including employees in the armed forces of the United States,who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the election', to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Firemen - and Oilers , Local 52 (AFL ), for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation