Steven M. Schwartz, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 12, 2007
0120072352 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 12, 2007)

0120072352

10-12-2007

Steven M. Schwartz, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.


Steven M. Schwartz,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120072352

Hearing No. 510-2007-00038X

Agency No. 1H-331-0024-06

DECISION

On April 13, 2007, complainant filed an appeal from the agency's March

13, 2007, final order concerning his equal employment opportunity (EEO)

complaint alleging employment discrimination in violation of Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. The appeal is deemed timely and is accepted for

the Commission's de novo review pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a).

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, complainant had

worked as a Clerk at the agency's Processing and Distribution Center

facility in Miami, Florida. He had been on the rolls of the Office of

Workers Compensation Programs (OWCP) since 2002, due to a compensable

on-the-job injury dating back to 1993. On June 21, 2006, complainant

filed an EEO complaint alleging that he was discriminated against on the

basis of disability when on April 12, 2006, he was given notice that

effective May 27, 2006, he was to be separated from the agency due to

an inability to perform the essential functions of his job.

At the conclusion of the investigation, complainant was provided with a

copy of the report of investigation and notice of his right to request

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). Complainant timely

requested a hearing. On November 29, 2006, the agency submitted a motion

for a decision without a hearing. Complainant submitted his objections

to the agency's motion on December 17, 2006. The AJ assigned to the case

granted the agency's motion and issued a decision without a hearing on

February 9, 2007. The agency subsequently issued a final order adopting

the AJ's finding that complainant failed to prove that he was subjected

to discrimination as alleged.

After a thorough review of the record, and the arguments submitted by

the parties on appeal, we find that the AJ's decision without a hearing

was appropriate, as no genuine issue of material fact is in dispute.

See Petty v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01A24206 (July 11,

2003); Murphy v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01A04099 (July

11, 2003). We further find that the AJ's conclusion that complainant

has not shown that he was discriminated against based on disability,

and the agency's implementation of that decision, was correct, and we

AFFIRM the agency's finding of no discrimination.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

10-12-07

__________________

Date

2

0120072352

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120072352