Steven Lewis, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 2, 1999
01982848 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 2, 1999)

01982848

03-02-1999

Steven Lewis, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Steven Lewis v. United States Postal Service

01982848

March 2, 1999

Steven Lewis, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01982848

) Agency No. 1-H-336-0005-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final decision of

the agency concerning his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination,

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq. The final agency decision was received by

appellant on February 21, 1998. The appeal was postmarked February 24,

1998. Accordingly, the appeal is timely (see 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a)),

and is accepted in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed appellant's

complaint for failure to timely file a formal complaint after receiving

notice of his right to do so.

BACKGROUND

Appellant contacted an EEO counselor on September 23, 1997, regarding

allegations of discrimination. Specifically, appellant alleged that he

was discriminated against when on September 8, 1997, he was instructed to

notify his supervisor when going to the bathroom. Informal efforts to

resolve appellant's concerns were unsuccessful. On November 13, 1997,

appellant received an agency document entitled "Notice of Right to File

Individual Complaint." Therein, the agency informed appellant that he

had fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the notice in which

to file a formal complaint.

Appellant filed a formal complaint on December 2, 1997, alleging that

he was the victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the basis of

race (black). On February 11, 1998, the agency issued a final decision

(FAD) dismissing appellant's complaint for failure to timely file a

written complaint after having received notice of his right to do so.

Specifically, the agency found that appellant received the "Notice of

Right to File Individual Complaint" on November 13, 1997. The agency

further determined that appellant's formal complaint, hand delivered

to the EEO office on December 2, 1997, was filed more than fifteen (15)

days after appellant had received said Notice.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.106(b) requires the filing of a written

complaint with an appropriate agency official within fifteen (15)

calendar days after the date of the receipt of the notice of right to

file, required by 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(d), (e), or (f).

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) provides that the agency shall

dismiss a complaint or a portion thereof, that fails to comply with

the applicable time limits contained in ��1614.105, 1614.106, and

1614.204(c), unless the agency extends the time limits in accordance

with �1614.604(c).

The record herein indicates that on November 13, 1997, appellant

received an agency document entitled "Notice of Right to File Individual

Complaint" informing him of his right to file within fifteen (15) days of

his receipt of the Notice. Accordingly, appellant's complaint would be

timely filed on November 28, 1997. The record indicates, however, that

appellant's complaint was not received by the agency EEO office until

December 2, 1997. Appellant failed to timely file his formal complaint

pursuant to EEOC Regulations. On appeal, appellant asserts that because

his representative had been out of town for two weeks, he was unable,

without the assistance of his representative, to file his complaint in

a timely fashion. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.605(e) provides that

the Complainant shall at all times be responsible for proceeding with

the complaint whether or not he or she has a designated representative.

See Carla Hunter v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01970180

(September 11, 1997).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing appellant's complaint is

hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Mar 2, 1999

____________________________

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations