Stephen Linzay, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 15, 2007
0120065208 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 15, 2007)

0120065208

10-15-2007

Stephen Linzay, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Stephen Linzay,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120065208

Agency No. 4G700007506

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated August 15, 2006, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that a portion of

complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. In his complaint,

complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases

of race (Caucasian), sex (male), color (White), age (D.O.B. 03/09/65),

and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 when (1) he was cursed at by a co-worker which led to

his being suspended on December 7, 2005, (2) on January 20, 2006 he was

questioned, assaulted, and harassed by a co-worker and nothing was done,

(3) on February 15, 2006 he was issued a 14 day suspension for improper

conduct, (4) on May 8 and May 12 he witnessed other employees using

profanity and nothing was done when he reported it to management.

The record discloses that the agency dismissed claims 1-3 because

complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until

April 13, 2006, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation

period. Complainant asserts that he contacted a counselor on January

20, 2006 and asked for a packet for filing an EEO complaint. Complainant

asserted that he filed a pre-complaint form on February 24, 2006 for claim

1. The Commission notes that even using that date, although he called

the counselor on January 20, 2006 it was not until he filed that forms

that he initiated the EEO process. Further as noted by the counselor,

after he requested the forms he had 10 days to complete them or the

matter was considered closed. Although complainant stated he was in a

car accident on January 8, 2006, he did not show he was so incapacitated

he could not have filled out the forms earlier.

Claims 2 and 4 do not state a claim. The regulation set forth at 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part, that an agency shall

dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. An agency shall accept

a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment

who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that

agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or

disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's

federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee"

as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term,

condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.

Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April

21, 1994). Complainant failed to show how he was harmed when the agency

did not discipline other employees.

Regarding claim 3, complainant stated he filed a grievance on the matter

and served the suspension on March 17, 2006. Relying on the agency's April

13, 2006 date of counselor contact, we find this claim is timely. 29

C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) states that an aggrieved person must contact

an EEO counselor within 45 days of the effective date of the personnel

action - in this case the suspension. As such, the agency's dismissal of

this claim is reversed. Further, to the extent that complainant alleged

he learned he was being treated differently than others as evidenced by

his claims in claim 4, such information should be used as appropriate.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed as to claims 1, 2, and 4 and reversed as to claim

3. the agency shall comply with the order as set forth below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim 3 in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 15, 2007

__________________

Date

2

0120065208

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120065208