Solas OLED LimitedDownload PDFPatent Trials and Appeals BoardMar 2, 2021IPR2020-00177 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 2, 2021) Copy Citation Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 32 571-272-7822 Entered: March 2, 2021 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD LG DISPLAY CO. LTD., Petitioner, v. SOLAS OLED LIMITED, Patent Owner. IPR2020-00177 Patent 7,432,891 B2 Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JESSICA C. KAISER and JULIA HEANEY, Administrative Patent Judges. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judge. TERMINATION Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial 35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 IPR2020-00177 Patent 7,432,891 B2 2 DISCUSSION Pursuant to Board authorization, the parties filed (1) a Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding (Paper 29); (2) a true copy of the parties’ settlement agreement (Ex. 1055); and (3) a joint motion to treat the settlement agreement as business confidential information, and to keep separate from the file of the involved patent, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 30). Oral argument has not been held, and a final written decision has not been entered. In the Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding, the parties indicate that they have settled all their disputes at issue in this proceeding, and have agreed to terminate the proceeding. Paper 29, 1. The parties represent that Exhibit 1055 is “[a] true and correct copy of the Confidential Settlement Agreement” and that “there are no other agreements, oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of the proceeding.” Id. at 2. Under these particular circumstances, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. We also have reviewed the parties’ settlement agreement, and we determine that good cause exists to treat this settlement agreement as business confidential information, and keep it separate from the file of U.S Patent No. 7,432,891 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’891 Patent”), under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). IPR2020-00177 Patent 7,432,891 B2 3 ORDER In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the parties’ request (Paper 30) to treat the true copy of their settlement agreement (Ex. 1055) as business confidential information, and to keep separate from the file of the involved patent, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the settlement agreement (Ex. 1055) shall be treated as business confidential information, kept separate from the file of the ’891 Patent, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request to the Board, or to any person on a showing of good cause, under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding (Paper 29) is granted, and the proceeding is terminated. IPR2020-00177 Patent 7,432,891 B2 4 PETITIONER: Jonathan M. Strang Andrew Goldberg Gabriel S. Gross Joseph H. Lee Douglas E. Lumish Blake R. Davis Latham & Watkins LLP jonathan.strang@lw.com drew.goldberg@lw.com gabe.gross@lw.com joseph.lee@lw.com doug.lumish@lw.com blake.davis@lw.com PATENT OWNER: Neil Rubin Reza Mirzaie Philip X. Wang Kent N. Shum Russ August & Kabat nrubin@raklaw.com rmirzaie@raklaw.com pwang@raklaw.com kshum@raklaw.com rak_realtimedata@raklaw.com Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation