Shtrom et al.v.Rada et al.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Apr 30, 2013

11173888 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 30, 2013)

BoxInterferences@uspto.gov Paper 95
Telephone: 571-272-4683 ENTERED: 30 April 2013

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Patent Interference No. 105,870

Patrick RADA
and Smiley Kuntjoro
(7,522,569),
Junior Party,

v.

Victor SHTROM,
Darin T. Milton and William S. Kish
(12/425,374),
Senior Party.

Before: RICHARD E. SCHAFER, RICHARD TORCZON and DEBORAH
KATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.

TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.

JUDGMENT
Bd.R. 127(b)(2)
requested

Interference No. 105,870 Page 2

Shtrom has represented that its involved claims should be canceled.
The effect of the request is that judgment may be entered against Shtrom.
1

Accordingly—
Judgment is entered against the senior party (Shtrom) for count 1, the
sole count
2
and
Claims 17-25 of Shtrom's involved 12/425,374 application are
FINALLY REFUSED.
3

A copy of this judgment will be entered in the administrative records
of the involved patent and the involved application.

cc:

TIMOTHY E. NEWHOLM, MICHAEL T. GRIGGS and ERIC L. SCHLEVENSKY,
Boyle Fredrickson, S.C., of Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and CHARLES L. GHOLZ,
Oblon Spivak, of Alexandria, Virginia.

STEPHEN R. BACHMANN and TAM THANH PHAM, Lewis & Roca LLP, of
Silicon Valley, California.

1
Paper 94.
2
Paper 28 at 2.
3
35 U.S.C. § 135(a).