Scott D. Rowe, Complainant,v.Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 15, 2007
0120073252 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 15, 2007)

0120073252

10-15-2007

Scott D. Rowe, Complainant, v. Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.


Scott D. Rowe,

Complainant,

v.

Carlos M. Gutierrez,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120073252

Agency No. 076300079

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated June 20, 2007, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim. In a complaint dated April 25, 2007,

complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases

of his veteran's status and reprisal when he was found not qualified for

the position of Assistant Regional Director in July 2006 and January

2007.

The Commission notes that complainant made it clear that he was alleging

discrimination based on his veteran's status. Complainant repeatedly

relied on his veteran's status as the reason he was passed over for

the positions. The Commission concludes that to the extent complainant

alleges he was denied rights due to his status as a disabled veteran,

complainant has failed to state a claim. The Commission has repeatedly

held that veteran preference or status is not a protected basis for filing

an EEO complaint and therefore such complaints are not within the purview

of EEOC Regulations. See Devereux v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Request No. 05960869 n. 1. (April 24, 1997). Moreover, the Commission

does not have any part in the enforcement of or jurisdiction over

the Veterans Readjustment Act or Veterans Affirmative Action Program.

To the extent that complainant believes that the agency is treating

veterans or disabled veterans in a discriminatory manner, complainant

is advised to contact the Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP),

the agency charged with such enforcement. Further, complainant has not

shown that he previously engaged in any protected activity to support

his claim of reprisal.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Because we find that complainant

has not asserted a basis within the Commission's jurisdiction, we need

not address the issue of timeliness. Accordingly, the agency's final

decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 15, 2007

__________________

Date

2

0120073252

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120073252