0120103622
03-01-2011
Richard Szczesny, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes Area), Agency.
Richard Szczesny,
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Great Lakes Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120103622
Agency No. 1J602007810
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated August 10, 2010, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).
BACKGROUND
During the relevant period, Complainant worked as an Electronics Technician at a Palatine, Illinois processing and distribution center of the Agency. On June 17, 2010, Complainant initiated EEO contact alleging that the Agency discriminated against him based on reprisal for prior EEO activity. Specifically, Complainant alleged that, on June 10, 2010, during an employee meeting to discuss fair ways of distributing overtime assignments, a supervisor, in the presence of two other management officials, suggested that the employees hold a "blanket party" for Complainant to restore overtime for everyone. Complainant noted that the June 10 meeting was scheduled as a result of an EEO settlement agreement in which Complainant had served as the representative to the EEO complainant alleging overtime assignments were being discriminatorily awarded. He added that a "blanket party" is a violent group attack on an unpopular soldier where the group places a blanket over the head and body of an individual and beats them to change their actions.
Subsequently, Complainant filed a formal EEO complaint reiterating the above claim, alleging that the supervisor was inciting his coworkers to violence in retaliation for his representation of an EEO complainant on the overtime issue.
In its August 10, 2010 final decision, the Agency dismissed Complainant's claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the Agency stated that Complainant failed to show a personal harm or loss with respect to a term, condition or privilege of employment or Agency actions reasonably likely to deter Complainant or others from engaging in EEO activity. The instant appeal from Complainant followed.
On appeal, Complainant reiterated prior contentions and added that he has been the butt of jokes and fears for his safety since the June 10 meeting. Complainant stated that management essentially authorized violence against him. He noted that management continues to retaliate against him and he has filed separate complaints concerning the denial of overtime to him personally and subsequent charges of absence without leave (AWOL) by the Agency.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Here, we disagree with the Agency's dismissal. The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
However, the anti-retaliation provisions of the employment discrimination statutes seek to prevent an employer from interfering with an employee's efforts to secure or advance enforcement of the statutes' basic guarantees, and are not limited to actions affecting employment terms and conditions. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad. Co. v. White, 548 U. S. ____, 126 S. Ct. 2405 (2006). To state a viable claim of retaliation, Complainant must allege that: 1) he was subjected to an action which a reasonable employee would have found materially adverse, and 2) the action could dissuade a reasonable employee from making or supporting a charge of discrimination. Id. While trivial harms would not satisfy the initial prong of this inquiry, the significance of the act of alleged retaliation will often depend upon the particular circumstances. See also EEOC Compliance Manual, No. 915.003 (May 20, 1998) (any adverse treatment that is based upon a retaliatory motive and is reasonably likely to deter the charging party or others from engaging in protected activity states a claim).
Applying these standards, we find Complainant has stated a viable claim of retaliation for engaging in protected EEO activity (serving as an EEO representative) which requires further investigation and processing.1
Accordingly, we REVERSE the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint. The complaint is hereby remanded to the Agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order below.
ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)
This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
___March 1, 2011_____
Date
1 We note that Complainant stated that he also filed separate retaliation complaints concerning denied overtime and AWOL charges. We remind the Agency, that pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.606, the Agency may process two or more complaints filed by the same complainant jointly.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0120103622
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120103622