Randall L. Roberts, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 18, 2012
0120103483 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 18, 2012)

0120103483

04-18-2012

Randall L. Roberts, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.




Randall L. Roberts,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120103483

Agency No. 1F-944-0007-10

DECISION

Upon review, we find that the Agency’s decision dated July 19, 2010,

dismissing Complainant’s complaint for failure to state a claim is

proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1614.107(a)(1). For the following reasons,

we AFFIRM the Agency’s decision.

BACKGROUND

In his complaint, Complainant alleged discrimination in reprisal for prior

EEO activity when since March 15, 2010, he has been subjected to hostile

work environment harassment in regards to: management engaged in rumor

spreading and innuendo in an attempt to cause friction between him and his

co-workers and to discredit his ability to represent employees. In its

final decision, the Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state

a claim since Complainant was not aggrieved regarding a term, condition,

or privilege of his employment as a result of the alleged claims.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Upon review, we find that Complainant failed to show that he was harmed

regarding his employment as a result of the purported rumors and innuendo.

See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April

21, 1994). Furthermore, Complainant did not indicate the specificity

of the alleged incidents. The Commission has consistently held that

a remark or comment unaccompanied by concrete action is not a direct

and personal deprivation sufficient to render an individual aggrieved

for the purposes of Title VII. Henry v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05940695

(February 9, 1995). Upon review, we do not find that purported rumor and

innuendo were sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions

of his employment such as to state a claim of harassment. See Harris

v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993); Cobb v. Department

of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997).

In addition, Complainant claimed that he was denied official time

concerning his previously filed complaints. The Agency indicated that

since December, 2009, Complainant was provided 73.64 hours of official

time on the clock preparing for his numerous complaints. Complainant does

not dispute this. Since this matter concerns Complainant’s previously

filed complaints, Complainant is advised to raise such during the pendency

of those particular complaints.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Agency’s decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

4/18/12

__________________

Date

2

0120103483

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013