05A00986
08-25-2000
Rachel M. Johnson, Complainant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Rachel M. Johnson v. Department of the Navy
05A00986
August 25, 2000
.
Rachel M. Johnson,
Complainant,
v.
Richard J. Danzig,
Secretary,
Department of the Navy,
Agency.
Request No. 05A00986
Appeal No. 01A00930
Agency No. DON 99-00232-005
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Rachel
M. Johnson v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01A00930 (June
13, 2000).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in
its discretion, grant a party's request to reconsider a decision issued
under the regulation set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to
be codified as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405(a)), if the party demonstrates that:
the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of
material fact or law; or
the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b)).
After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration,
the previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds
that complainant's request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �
1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request.
The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A00930 remains the Commission's
final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on
the decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0400)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to
file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be
filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right
to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 25, 2000
__________________
Date
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.