Progressive Dynamics, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 14, 1975221 N.L.R.B. 699 (N.L.R.B. 1975) Copy Citation PROGRESSIVE DYNAMICS, INC. Progressive Dynamics , Inc. and International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Petitioner. Case 7-RC-12949 November 14, 1975 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF RUNOFF ELECTION BY CHAIRMAN MURPHY AND MEMBERS FANNING AND PENELLO Pursuant to a Stipulation for Certification Upon Consent Election approved by the Regional Director on May 5, 1975, an election by secret ballot was conducted on June 6, 1975, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for Region 7, among the employees in the stipulated unit. At the conclusion of the election, the parties were furnished with a tally of ballots, which ' showed that, of approximately 137 eligible voters, 126 cast ballots, of which 55 were for the Petitioner, 6 for the Interve- nor,' 61 against the participating labor organizations, and 4 were challenged. The challenged ballots were sufficient in , number to affect the results of the election. The Regional Director, in accordance with the National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regula- tions, Series 8, as amended, on June 18, 1975, issued and duly served on the parties a notice of hearing on challenged ballots. Following the hearing, Hearing Officer Charles W. Slavin issued his report in which 1 United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC Y In the absence of exceptions thereto, we adopt, pro forma, the recommendation that the challenge to the ballot of Lou Ann Maisner be sustained 699 he recommended that the challenges be sustained and that a runoff election be conducted between the choices receiving the largest and ' second' largest number of votes in the election conducted on June 6, 1975. The Employer filed exceptions to the Hearing Officer's report and recommendations that the challenges to the ballots of William O'Brien, Harold Kemp, and Roger, Harford be sustained.2 Pursuant to the provisions of Section' 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as, amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. The Board has considered the Hearing Officer's report and the Employer's exceptions thereto, and hereby adopts the Hearing Officer's findings and recommendations.3 DIRECTION As no choice on the ballot received a majority of the valid ballots cast, It is hereby directed that the Regional Director for . Region 7 shall conduct a runoff election at a` tinie and place to be determined by him, among the employees in the unit employed during the payroll period used in the prior election to determine whether or not the employees in question desire to be represented for purposes of collective bargaining by International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO. 3 The Employer' s exceptions , in our opinion, raise no material or substantial issues of fact and law which would warrant reversal of the Hearing Officer 's findings and recommendations 221 NLRB No. 96 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation