Powdrell & Alexander, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 11, 194243 N.L.R.B. 1271 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter Of POWDRELL & ALEXANDER, INC. and-TEX TILE WORKERS' UNION OF AMERICA (C. I. 0.) Case No. R-4197. Decided September 11,1942,_, Jurisdiction : cotton fabric manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal to accord petitioner recognition until certified by the Board ; election necessary. • ' Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all production and maintenance employees at Company's six plants, excluding executives, employees having the right to hire or discharge or to recommend hire or discharge, and clerical employees. Stipulation as to. Mr. Samuel Franklin and Mr. John E. Stone, of'New York City, for the Company. Mr. Joseph Leeds, of Hartford, Conn., for the Union. Mr. Gilbert 'V. Rosenberg, of counsel to the Board.' DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon an amended petition duly filed by Textile Workers Union of America (C. I. 0.), herein called the Union, alleging that a 'question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of em- ployees of Powdrell & Alexander, Inc.,' Danielson, Connecticut, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for, an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Thomas H. Ramsey,• Trial Examiner . Said hearing was held, on August '25, 1942, at Danielson, ' Connecticut. The Company and the Union appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing upon the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings, made at the' hearing, ' are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. The' Company originally was incorrectly named as "Pow drell & Alexander Company." All formal papers were amended at the hearing , without objection , to set forth ' the correct ' name of the Company, as stated above. 43 N. L. It. B., No. 202. - i 1271 1272 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Powdrell & Alexander , Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, is en- gaged in the manufacture of cotton fabrics at six plants near Daniel- son, Connecticut , all of which are involved in this proceeding. During 1941 , the Company purchased raw materials , consisting principally of raw cotton , cotton yarns , chemicals , and mill supplies, valued at more than $1 ,500,000, of which more than 90 percent were obtained from sources outside the State 'of Connecticut . During the same period , it sold finished products valued at more than $5,000,000, - of which more than 90 percent were shipped to points outside the State of Connecticut. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Textile Workers Union of America is a labor' organization affili- ated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The' Company and The Union stipulated at the hearing that a question concerning representation had arisen in that the Company refused to recognize the Union as the exclusive representative of its employees within an appropriate', unit until the Board 'certified the Union as such representative. A statement by the Acting Regional Director, introduced in evi- dence at the hearing, shows that the Union represents a substantial number of the employees in the unit alleged by it to be appropriate.' i z The Acting Regional Director reported that the Union submitted 10 mimeographed, and 729 printed , membership cards Of the cards submitted , 489 bore the apparently genuine signatures of employees whose names appear on the Company 's pay roll of July 11, 1942 , containing the names of 1,363 employees ' within the alleged appropriate unit. The Company objected at the hearing to the introduction in evidence of the Acting Regional Director's statement on the ground that the recitations therein are hearsay and that the signatures on the membership cards had not been verified. The Company urges that its pay roll of August 15, 1942, be used to determine the Union's membership among the employees, and that the signatures on the membeiship cards submitted to the Acting Regional Director be authenticated by comparing them with the signatures appearing on employees' canceled pay checks, which were submitted at the hearing. The Company's objection is without merit As we have previously stated, the Regional Director's report on the evidence submitted in support of a labor organization ' s representation claim' is not taken as proof of the precise number of employees who desire to be represented by such a labor organization, but only to protect the Company and the Board from unfounded claims by such organizations and to give reasonable assurance that a substantial number of employees desire to be so represented. Matter of Interlake Iron Corporation and Local Union 1657, Steel Workers Organizing Committee, C. 1. 0., 38 N. L. R. B. 139; Matter of Superior Sleep -Rate Corporation and United Office and Professional Workers of America, Local 24, C. I. 0., 39 N., L. R. B. 606. POWDRELL & ALEXANDER, INC. 1273 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. ' - W. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT In accordance with a stipulation of the parties, we find that all production and maintenance employees at the Attawaugan, Ballou- ville, Brooklyn, Danielson No. 1, Danielson No. 2, and Danielson No. 3 plants of the Company, excluding executives, employees having the ' right to hire or discharge or to recommend hire or discharge, and clerical 'employees, constitute a unit. appropriate for the pur- poses of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES tilde shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period' immediately preceding the date of our Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. I DIRECTION OF ELECTION, By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Re- lations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Libor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Powdrell & Alexander , Inc., Danielson , Connecticut , an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction of Election , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the First Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Election , including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or' on vacation or' in the active military service or training of the United States , or temporarily laid off , but excluding employees who 1274 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR REFLATIONS BOARD have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Textile Workers Union of Amer- ica (C. I. 0.), for. the purposes of collective. bargaining. MR. GERARD D. REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation