Ozie L. Ryals, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 19, 1999
01981197 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 19, 1999)

01981197

03-19-1999

Ozie L. Ryals, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Ozie L. Ryals v. United States Postal Service

01981197

March 19, 1999

Ozie L. Ryals, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01981197

) Agency No. 1-A-072-1027-96

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's November 4, 1997 decision

dismissing appellant's complaint on the basis that appellant failed to

file his formal complaint of discrimination within the 15-calendar day

time limit provided by 29 C.F.R. �1614.106(b) is not proper.

The record shows that on August 20, 1996, the agency sent the notice

of the right to file a formal complaint to appellant by certified mail.

The certified mail return receipt on record shows that it was received

and signed for at appellant's address on "August 21". The notice advised

appellant that he had the right to file a complaint of discrimination

within 15 calendar days of his receipt of the notice. Appellant's formal

complaint was postmarked October 20, 1997. The agency issued a final

decision on October 29, 1997, and a second final decision on November

4, 1997. In its November 4, 1997 decision, the agency dismissed the

complaint on the basis that appellant had failed to file his formal

complaint within the 15-calendar day time limit provided by EEOC

Regulations.

On appeal, appellant contends that he did in fact file a formal

complaint of discrimination on September 3, 1996. Moreover, he provides

a copy of the June 7, 1997 E-mail message that he sent to the agency's

EEO specialist, in which he specifically mentions the dates in 1996,

in which he inquired about the processing of his complaint. Appellant

further contends that after being told in 1996, on at least two separate

occasions, that the agency was processing his complaint, in July 1997,

the agency informed his representative that no complaint had been received

on appellant's behalf. On appeal, the agency contends that while appellant

claims that he filed his formal complaint of discrimination on September

3, 1996, "neither he nor his representative at the time, made any contact

with the EEO office to determine the status of his complaint until his

June 7, 1997 letter".

The Commission has held that where there is an issue of timeliness, the

agency always bears the burden of obtaining sufficient information to

support a reasoned determination as to timeliness. Williams v. Department

of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992). Concerning

appellant's complaint, the agency has not met its burden. We find that

there is not sufficient evidence in the record to enable the Commission

to determine whether appellant did, in fact, file a formal complaint of

discrimination on September 3, 1996. Accordingly, the agency's final

decision is VACATED and the complaint is REMANDED for a supplemental

investigation on the issue of whether a formal complaint was filed or

not.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to conduct a supplemental investigation regarding

appellant's claim that he did file a formal complaint of discrimination

on September 3, 1996. Within sixty (60) days of the date this decision

becomes final, the agency shall contact appellant and allow him to provide

a written statement providing the date he allegedly filed the complaint

as well as the name(s) and title(s) of any agency official(s) who might

have received his complaint, if personally delivered, or any evidence

of postmark that appellant might have in his possession. The agency

will then provide affidavits from the appropriate agency officials.

If during the course of the supplemental investigation the agency

finds that appellant did not file a complaint, it shall then issue

a final decision dismissing the complaint and will provide appellant

with all relevant information concerning his appeal rights. However,

if during the course of its supplemental investigation the agency becomes

aware that appellant did in fact timely file a complaint, it shall then

process the complaint pursuant to the provisions of 29 C.F.R.�1614.108.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and/or a

copy of the final agency decision must be sent to the Compliance officer

as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 19, 1999

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations