New Jersey Rubber Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 14, 194772 N.L.R.B. 653 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of NEW JERSEY RUBBER COMPANY, EMPLOYER and UNITED RUBBER, CORK , LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO, PETITIONER Case No. 1-R-3453.-Decided February 14, 1947 Stoneman and Chandler, by Mr. Harold Zarling, of Boston, Mass., for the Employer. Rothbard, Harris and Oxfeld, by Mr. Samuel Rothbard, of Newark, N. J., for the Petitioner. Messrs. Daniel J. Healy and Frank Norton, of Boston, Mass., for the Intervenor. Miss Eleanor Schwart2bach, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Taunton, Massachusetts, on December 27,1946, before Robert E. Greene, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the, entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER New Jersey Rubber Company, a New Jersey corporation, has its place of business at Taunton , Massachusetts , where it is engaged in the manufacture of rubber heels, soles , and slabs for the shoe industry. The Employer uses at its plant raw materials consisting of crude and synthetic rubber, cotton flock, clay, silene, compounding oils, and red oxide, of which more than 90 percent is received from points outside the State of Massachusetts. During the first 6 months of 1946, the Employer's finished products were valued at $752,648 .39, of which approximately 18 percent was shipped to points outside the State. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 72 N. L. R. B., No. 125. 653 654 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. On December 18, 1945, the Employer and the Intervenor entered into a contract to remain in full force and effect until December 18, 1946. This contract was automatically renewable unless written notice was given by either party 30 days prior to the termination of the contract. On November 4, 1946, more than 30 days prior to the first anniversary date of the contract, the Petitioner filed with the Board the petition herein. By letter, dated November 5, 1946, the Petitioner notified the Employer that it represented a majority of the Employer's employees, and requested recognition as their exclusive bargaining representative. The Intervenor contends that the contract above noted is a bar to a determination of representatives at this time. Inasmuch as the Petitioner's petition was filed prior to the operative date of the auto- matic renewal clause, we find that the contract is pot a bar to this proceeding. We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. Iv. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. Rubber Workers Federal Labor Union, Local 23901, herein called the Intervenor, is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. We find, in accordance with the agreement of the parties, that all production and maintenance employees, excluding office and clerical employees, executives, and all other supervisory employees with au- thority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. 0 NEW JERSEY RUBBER COMPANY DIRECTION OF ELECTION 655 As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur- poses of collective bargaining with New Jersey Rubber Company, Taunton, Massachusetts, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the First Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations- Series 4, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Sec- tion IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period imme- diately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been dis- charged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, CIO, or by Rubber Workers Federal Labor Union, Local 23901, A. F. of L., for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. 731242-47-vol 72--43 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation