National Die Casting Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMay 17, 194131 N.L.R.B. 942 (N.L.R.B. 1941) Copy Citation In the Matter Of HERBERT C. JOHNSON, DOING BUSINESS AS NATIONAL DIE CASTING COMPANY and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DIE CASTING WORKERS, AFFILIATED WITH THE C. I. O. Case No. R-2115 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND DIRECTION May 17, 1941 On October 30, 1940, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, issued a Decision and Direction of Election in the above entitled proceedings.1 Pursuant to the Direction of Election, an election by secret ballot was conducted on November 25, 1940, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region (Chicago, Illinois). On December 12, 1940, the Regional Director, acting pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of Na- tional Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, issued and duly served upon the parties yin Election Report. As to the balloting and its results, the Regional Director reported as follows : Total number eligible--------------------------------------- Total number of ballots cast________________________________ Total number of ballots cast for the Union___________________ Total number of ballots cast against the Union________________ Total number of challenged ballots___________________________ Total number of blank ballots ------------------------------- Total number of void ballots ________________________________ 61 57 27 24 6 0 0 In his Election Report, the Regional Director 'recommended that the challenge to the ballot of Reinhold Hanson by National Associa- tion of Die Casting Workers, affiliated with the C. I. 0., herein called the Union should be sustained, and that the challenges to the ballots of Edward Kaczmarek, Rex McDowell, James Pals, and Richard Louis, by the Union, and the challenge to the ballot of Chester New- man; by the Board's agent, should be overruled. On December 17, 1940, Herbert C. Johnson, doing business as Na-` tional Die Casting Company, herein called the Company, filed Ob- 1 27 N . L. R B. 1144. 31 N. L. R. B., No. 160. 942 HERBERT C . JOHNSON 943 jections to that portion of the Election Report which recommended that the challenge to the ballot' of Reinhold Hanson be sustained. On December 20, 1940, the Regional Director, acting pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of the aforesaid Rules and Regulations , issued a Report on Objections, copies of which were duly served upon all the parties. Thereafter, upon motion filed by the Union on January 7, 1941,2 the Board, on January 11, 1941, issued an order "Granting Leave (to the Union) to File Instanter Objections to Election Report." In its, Objections, the Union took issue with the recommendation of the Regional Director that the challenges to the ballots of Mc- Dowell , Pals, and Louis be overruled. The Union also , claimed that the Company had interfered with and intimidated its employees in an attempt to influence the election. On February, 25, 1941, the Acting Regional Director issued and duly served upon the parties a Supplemental Report on Objections., He recommended therein that the Board direct a hearing on the Objections. On March 4, 1941, it appearing that the objections filed by the parties raised substantial and material issues with respect to the conduct of the ballot and the Election Report, the Board, acting pursuant to Article III, Section 9 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered a hearing on the objections and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it after giving due notice thereof to the parties. On March 7, 1941, the Acting Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company and the Union. On March 22, 1941, the Acting Regional Director issued and duly served upon the parties an order continuing the hearing to April,7, 1941. Pursuant to such order, a hearing was held on April 7 and 8, 1941, at Chicago, Illinois, before Earl S. Bellman, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Board, the Company, and the Union were represented by counsel and partici- pated in the hearing. F{ill opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing, the Trial Examiner made various ruling on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were com- mitted. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Thereafter the Company submitted a memorandum which the Board has considered. Upon the foregoing record, the Election Report, the Objections, the Report on Objections, and the record previously made, the Board, acting pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and 9, of National Labor Y The Company filed " Suggestions ^n opposition to the Motion . . . 944 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, hereby makes the following: SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT The Union challenged the ballots of Reinhold Hanson, Rex Mc- Dowell , James Pals, Richard Louis, and Edward Kaczmarek on the ground that they were supervisory employees and as such were ex- cluded from the unit found by the Board to be appropriate in its Decision and Direction of Election . The Board 's agent challenged the ballot of Chester Newman as his name did not appear on the Company's pay roll of October 28 , 1940, which was used to determine those eligible to vote in the-election . As noted above , the Regional Director recommended that the challenge to the vote of Hanson be sustained and that the challenges to the votes of McDowell, Pals, Louis, Kaczmarek , and Newman be overruled . The Company objects to the Regional Director 's recommendation ' as to Hanson 's ballot; the Union objects to the recommendation with respect to the votes of McDowell , Pals, and Louis. No objections have been filed to the recommendation that the challenges to the ballots of Kaczmarek and Newman be overruled. Reinhold Hanson is employed as a sprayer and assembler in the spraying, assembling, and packing department. He is paid on a straight hourly basis. Although his rate of pay is higher than the- other employees in his department , Hanson 's duties are similar to such other employees who were declared eligible to vote in the elec- tion. At the time of the balloting , Hanson stated to the Board's agent that he was a foreman. The record shows, however, that Hanson is an ordinary employee without supervisory status and is included within the appropriate unit. We shall overrule the recom- mendation of the Regional Director in regard to Hanson , and direct that his ballot be counted. ' Rex McDowell , James Pals, and Richard Louis, are employed, re- spectively , as a polisher in the polishing department , inspector in the die-casting department , and set-up man and trimmer in the trimming department. Like Hanson, their rates of pay are higher than the other employees doing similar work in their respective departments. The Company submits that they are paid a higher rate because they have more seniority and more mechanical ability. The record does not sustain the Union 's contention that these employees have super- visory powers. We find that they are included within the appro- priate unit . We shall sustain the recommendation of the Regional Director in regard to the ballots of McDowell , Pals, and Louis, and we shall direct that their ballots be counted. HERBERT C . JOHNSON 945 The Regional Director found in his Election Report that Edward Kaczmarek is a shipping clerk without any supervisory status and is included within the appropriate unit. The Regional Director also found that Chester Newman had been temporarily laid off at the time of the election , and that his name had been erroneously omitted from the Company's pay roll of October 28, 1940. Since no objections have been filed to the recommendation of the Regional Director that the challenges to the ballots of Kaczmarek and Newman be overruled, we shall sustain the Regional Director's ruling in regard to these employees, and we shall direct that their ballots be counted. We have examined 'the record with respect to the other allegations contained in the Union 's Objections to the Election Report and we find insufficient evidence to warrant a finding that the Company in- terfered with and intimidated its employees prior to the election. The objections of the Union in this respect are hereby overruled. DIRECTION By, virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat . 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended , it is-hereby DIRECTED that , as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Herbert C. Johnson, doing business as National Die Casting Company, Chicago , Illinois, the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region (Chicago, ' Illinois ) shall, pursuant to the Rules and Regu- lations of the Board , set forth above, and subject to Article III, Sec- tion 9, of said Rules and Regulations , within ten ( 10) days from the date of this Direction , open and count the ballots of Reinhold Hanson, Rex McDowell , James Pals, Richard Louis, Edward Kaczmarek, and Chester Newman, and shall thereafter prepare and cause to be served upon the parties in this case a Supplemental Election Report embody- ing his findings therein and his recommendations as to the results of the secret ballot. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation