Nathan E. Defrain, Complainant,v.Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 14, 2007
0520070526 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 14, 2007)

0520070526

06-14-2007

Nathan E. Defrain, Complainant, v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.


Nathan E. Defrain,

Complainant,

v.

Robert M. Gates,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Defense Commissary Agency),

Agency.

Request No. 0520070526

Appeal No. 0120061358

Agency No. 05EAVBBK016

DENIAL

The agency timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Nathan

E. Defrain v. Defense Commissary Agency, EEOC Appeal No. 0120061358

(April 3, 2007). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In the underlying case, complainant alleged that he was discriminated

against on the basis of his age (D.O.B. 12/24/31) in violation of the

Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 621 et seq., when on December 2, 2004, the agency allowed his

temporary assignment to expire, rather than extending it. The agency

investigated complainant's complaint and issued a Report of Investigation

to complainant. Complainant was informed of his right to request a

hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) or a final decision

from the agency. When complainant failed to respond within the requisite

time frame, the agency issued a final agency decision (FAD) finding that

he failed to establish that he was discriminated against as alleged.

Complainant appealed the FAD to the Commission.

In Defrain v. Defense Commissary Agency, EEOC Appeal No. 0120061358

(April 3, 2007), the Commission found that complainant established

that the agency discriminated against him based on his age when it

failed to extend his temporary assignment prior to its expiration.

In so finding, the Commission determined that complainant established

a prima facie case of age discrimination. Further the Commission found

that complainant put forth sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the

agency's proffered legitimate, non-discriminatory reason was a pretext

for age discrimination. Specifically, the agency provided that it

declined to extend complainant's assignment due to budgetary constraints.

However, the Commission determined that the preponderance of the evidence

demonstrated that the reason articulated by the agency was not worthy of

credence. Moreover, the Commission found that the evidence demonstrated

that the agency discriminated against complainant because of his age.

The Commission ordered the agency to offer complainant a temporary

appointment and to train employees with regard to their responsibilities

under the ADEA. Further, the Commission ordered the agency to provide

complainant with back-pay with interest.

In the instant case, the agency requests that the Commission reconsider

its decision. In support of its request, the agency argues that the

Commission committed four erroneous interpretations of fact. First,

the agency argues that the Commission erred in finding that the Store

Director's (SD) concern that the physical demands of the job may have been

more than complainant was capable of performing meant that the SD thought

complainant was too old to perform his duties. Second, the agency argues

that the Commission erred when it found that the agency wanted to make

way for younger workers because the SD failed to extend complainant's

temporary appointment, had younger employees performed complainant's

work, hired an assistant store manager, transferred a second temporary

appointment into a permanent position, and extended a third temporary

appointment. Third, the agency argues that the Commission erred in

finding that SD's negative reference for complainant was due to his age.

Finally, the agency argues that the Commission's erred in finding that

it violated its long standing practice of extending temporary employment

because of complainant's age.

We find that none of the agency's arguments are sufficiently persuasive

to establish that the Commission's interpretation of facts were clearly

erroneous. Moreover, a preponderance of the evidence supports the

Commission's interpretation of the facts and the ultimately finding of

age discrimination. Therefore, after reconsidering the previous decision

and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to

meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision

of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 0120061358 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request. The agency shall comply with the Order as set forth

below.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to take the following remedial action:

1. If CW-2's appointment remained temporary, the agency shall

offer to appoint complainant to a temporary appointment for at least one

year in the position of Store Worker, WG-05, in the Defense Commissary

Agency. However, if CW-2's appointment became permanent, then the

agency shall offer to appoint complainant to a permanent appointment

in the above-referenced position. Complainant will have fifteen (15)

calendar days to accept or reject the agency's offer in writing.

2. The agency shall provide complainant with the appropriate back

pay, with interest, for the period starting on December 2, 2004 and ending

when CW-2's temporary appointment either ended or became permanent.

If CW-2's appointment became permanent, then back pay shall end either

when complainant refuses the position as prescribed in paragraph 1 of

this Order, or when he begins said position. The back pay shall be

computed in the manner prescribed by 5 C.F.R. � 550.805. The agency

shall determine the appropriate amount of back pay, with interest, and

other benefits due complainant, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1614.501, no later

than sixty (60) calendar days after the date this decision becomes final.

Complainant shall cooperate in the agency's efforts to compute the amount

of back pay and benefits due, and shall provide all relevant information

requested by the agency. If there is a dispute regarding the exact

amount of back pay and/or benefits, the agency shall issue a check to

complainant for the undisputed amount within sixty (60) calendar days

of the date the agency determines the amount it believes to be due.

The complainant may petition for enforcement or clarification of the

amount in dispute. The petition for clarification or enforcement must

be filed with the Compliance Officer, at the address reference in the

statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision."

3. Within 90 days of the date this decision becomes final, the

agency shall train the Store Director and all responsible agency employees

involved in this action on the laws concerning age discrimination under

the ADEA and the agency's duties under that statute to ensure that

similar violations did not occur.

4. The agency shall consider taking disciplinary action against

the Store Director and all other individuals responsible for making

the agency's decision in this matter. If the agency decides to take

disciplinary action, it shall identify in a compliance report the

action taken. If the agency decides not to take disciplinary action,

it shall set forth in its compliance report the reason for its decision

not to impose discipline.

5. The agency shall send evidence that they have complied with the

above provisions of this order to the Compliance Officer as referenced

herein.

POSTING ORDER (G0900)

The agency is ordered to post at its Naval Shipyard Portsmouth Commissary,

Portsmouth, New Hampshire facility copies of the attached notice.

Copies of the notice, after being signed by the agency's duly authorized

representative, shall be posted by the agency within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final, and shall remain posted

for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places, including all

places where notices to employees are customarily posted. The agency

shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered,

defaced, or covered by any other material. The original signed notice

is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited in

the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision,"

within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

___6/14/07_______________

Date

2

0520070526

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0520070526