Müllerv.Bergmann et al.Download PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardJun 23, 201413139053 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 23, 2014) Copy Citation BoxInterferences@uspto.gov Entered: 23 June 2014 Telephone: 571-272-4683 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Patent Interference No. 105,997 Patrick VON HERTZBERG (13/139,053), Junior Party, v. Wenzel BERGMANN and Thomas Müller (13/131,136), Senior Party. Before: RICHARD TORCZON, DEBORAH KATZ and HUNG H. BUI, Administrative Patent Judges. TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Bd.R. 127(b)(4) abandonment of contest As explained in the accompanying order, the junior party (von Hertzberg) has elected not to file a priority statement. Accordingly— Interference No. 105,997 Page 2 Judgment is entered against von Hertzberg for the subject matter of count 1, the sole count. 1 Claims 1-24 and 28-34 of von Hertzberg's involved 13/139,053 application are FINALLY REFUSED. 2 A copy of this judgment shall be entered in the administrative records of the involved applications. Any party seeking judicial review timely must serve notice on the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 3 cc: KEVIN E. NOONAN, LISA M.W. HILLMAN and SARAH FENDRICK, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, of Chicago, Illinois. JEFFREY L. CLARK and JOHN S. MORTIMER, Wood, Phillips, Katz, Clark & Mortimer, of Chicago, Illinois. APJ Initials: HHB DK RT 1 Paper 1 at 3. 2 35 U.S.C. 135(a) (2012). 3 37 C.F.R. §§ 90.1 and 104.2. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation
