Miller & Miller Motor Freight LinesDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsAug 28, 194563 N.L.R.B. 594 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter of MILLER & MILLER MOTOR FREIGHT LINES and INTER- NATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSE- MEN AND HELPERS, LOCAL UNION No. 47 , AFL Case No. 16-R-1181 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND SECOND DIRECTION OF ELECTION August 28,19-115 On May 3, 1945, the Board issued a Decision and Direction of Election in the above-entitled proceeding' On May 25, 1945, follow- ing the Company's motion for reconsideration of the aforesaid De- cision, the Board ordered that the election be stayed, and the record be reopened and a further hearing held for the purpose of receiving additional evidence with respect to the appropriate unit. Pursuant to such order, the Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Earl Saunders, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Fort Worth, Texas, on July 9, 1945. The Company and the Union appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and.cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing oft the issues. At the hearing the Company moved (1) to investigate the present interest of the Union among the em- ployees in the alleged appropriate unit, and (2) to dismiss the peti- tion on the ground that the Union no longer represented a substantial number of employees in the aforesaid unit. The Trial Examiner granted the first motion and reserved ruling on the second motion for the Board. For reasons stated in footnote 2, the granting of the first motion was erroneous, and both motions are hereby denied.2 All other rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing are free from preju- ' 61 N L R B 872. 2 The record was reopened for the sole purpose of permitting the parties to adduce addi- tional evidence as to the appropriate unit In peinnttmg the introduction of evidence tending to show the Union's loss of present representation among the employees in the appropriate unit, the Trial Examiner clearly was in error since this issue was not within the scope of the Board's order reopening the hearing Accordingly, the motion to investi- gate the present interest of the Union among employees in the appiopriate unit should have been denied. 63 N. L R B., No. 95. 594 MILLER & MILLER MOTOR FREIGHT LINES 595 dicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an op- portunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : SUPPLEMENTAL FINDING OF FACT The appropriate unit The Union and the Company introduced evidence as to the units covered by presently existing collective bargaining contracts to which various motor carrier firms operating in Texas and the surrounding area are parties. This evidence fails to reveal any universal bar- gaining pattern in the industry ; some of the contracts cover only ever- the-road drivers, others only local pick-up and delivery drivers, dock- men and warehousemen, still others cover all drivers, over-the-road and local pick-up and delivery, as well as dockmen and warehousemen in a siligTe system-wide unit. The Board's decisions reflect the same diversity in its unit findings 3 In reaching a decision as to the ap- propriateness of a system-wide or terminal unit in any particular case, the Board has generally considered pertinent the extent to which the employees have been organized. Where organization has proceeded on a system-wide basis, the Board has held a proposed terminal unit inappropriate; 4 on the other hand, where organization has been lim- ited to terminal employees, it has found such a unit appropriate.5 The criteria invoked in our prior decisions are equally applicable to the facts of the present case. Accordingly, since the only union here involved has confined its organizational activities to the employees of the Fort Worth terminal, we reaffirm our previous finding as to the appropriateness of the Fort Worth terminal unit. Since the election originally directed was stayed and the time for the holding thereof has elapsed, we shall issue a Second Direction of Election, directing that an 'election be held among the employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of our Second Direction of Election, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. 3 Matter of Miller it Miller Motor Freight Lines , 59 N. L R B 203 ( separate units of over-the-road drivers, and of pick-up and delivery drivers, dockmen and warehousemen at a single terminal ) ; Matter of Merrill Motor Line , 58 N. L R . B 828 ( unit of over-the- road drivers ) Matter of English Freight Company , 58 N L . R B. 67 ( unit of over-the- road drivers ) Matter of Sunset Motor Lines, 59 N L R B 1434 . ( u nit of pick-up and delivery drivers and dockmen at single terminal) , Matter of Johnson Motor Lines, 60 N L R. B . 761 (unit of pick-up and delivery drivers, warehousemen and dockmen at single terminal ) , Matter of Central Freight Lines , Ineorpoiated , et at, 58 N L R B 263 (system -wide unit). * Matter of T. S C. Motor Freight 7 ,ines, 61 N L R B. 638. i Matter of Sunset Motor Lines, supra. 662514-46-vol 63-39 596 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD SECOND DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for , the purposes of collective bargaining with Miller & Miller Motor Freight Lines, Wichita Falls, Texas ; an election by secret bal- lot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Second Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Sixteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations , among the , employees in the unit found appropriate in , Section IV of the Board's Decision and Direction of Election issued on May 35 1945 , who were employed during the pay-roll period immedi- ately preceding the date'of this Second Direction , including employees who did not work during the said pay -roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election , to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Teamsters , Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers , Local Union No. 47 , AFL, for the pur- poses of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation