Memphis Butchers Association, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 27, 194772 N.L.R.B. 934 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of MEl rii-n s B uTCHERs ASSOCIATION, INC., Ei I PLOYER and UNITED PACKINGHOUSE WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFFILIATED WITH THE CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS , PETITIONER Case No. 15-B-1913.-Decided February 27, 19/.7 Messrs. Abe D. Waldaucr and Ben C. Adams, of Memphis, Tenn., for the Employer. Mr. G. R. Hathaway, of Atlanta, Ga., for the Petitioner. }Messrs. Robert A. Tillman, Wilson Rowland, and Ernest Leslie, of Memphis, Tenn., for the Intervenor. Mr. P. C. Anderson, of Memphis, Tenn., for the Operating Engi- neers. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND ORDER • Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on September 25, 1946, before Gerald A. Brown, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearnig are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. At the hearing, the Inter- venor moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that a contract between the Intervenor and the Employer is a bar to an election. The hearing officer referred this motion to the Board. For reasons stated in Section III, infra, this motion is hereby granted. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER Memphis Butchers Association, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, is en gaged in the operation of an abbatoir as a custom killer in Memphis, Tennessee.' The Employer also purchases hides and non-edible fats, and its volume of sales of these items in States other than that of 1 During the 6 months preceding the hearing, the Employer slaughtered an average of approximately 850 head of livestock each Reek This livestock is obtained lions customers in Shelby County, Tennessee, and the Employer has no knowledge of its original source The carcasses are delivered to customers in Shelby County, Tennessee, and the Employer has no knowledge of where the carcasses arc shipped 72 N. L. R. B., No. 159 - 934 MEMPHIS BUTCHERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 935 Tennessee during the past year was approximately $140,000. - More- over, the Employer makes fertilizer, and during the past year shipped approximately 500 pounds weekly to points outside the State of Tennessee. The Employer admits, for the purposes of this proceeding only, and we find, that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, clanning to represent employees of the Employer. Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North Amer- ica, Local 515, herein called the Intervenor, is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, claiming to repre- sent employees of the Employer. International Union of Operating Engineers, herein called the Operating Engineers, is a labor organization affiliated with the Amer- ican Federation of Labor., III. THE ALLEGED QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On September 17, 1941, following a Board certification,3 the Inter venor and the Employer executed a contract covering all production and maintenance employees of the Employer. Paragraph 16 of this contract provides: This agreement shall be in full force and binding upon both parties until the 17th day of September 1942. This agreement shall automatically renew itself from year to year unless the parties seeking changes of agreement shall notify the other in writing thirty (30) clays in advance of such desire. The pro- visions of the new agreement shall be effective from the date following the expiration of the old agreement. (b) The basic part of this contract shall be in full force with the exception of Clause No. 7 pertaining to wages only, which can be reopened with thirty (30) days written notice. 011 August 19, 1946, the Petitioner, by letter, apprised the Employer of its rival claim to representation, and on August 23, 1946, filed the original petition in this case. The Intervenor contends that its contract with the Employer is a bar to an election at this time. The Petitioner, on the other hand, contends that the contract is not a bar because (1) the allegedly ambiguous language in the automatic renewal clause makes the con- 2 At the hearing the Operating Engineers disclaimed any interest in the employees of the Employer 'Matter of Memphis Butchers Association, Inc. 34 N L R B 698 936 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD tract one of indefinite duration, and (2) the Intervenor is a defunct labor organization. The only possible ambiguity in the language of the automatic renewal clause quoted above are the words "in advance of such de- sire." We are of the opinion, however, that, in their context, these words must reasonably be read as "in advance of any anniversary date." Accordingly, we reject the contention that the contract is one of indefinite duration. Nor do we find merit in the Petitioner's contention that the Inter- venor is a defunct labor organization. For the record discloses that the Intervenor has not ceased to function as the bargaining represent- ative of the Employer's employees. Although no evidence was pre- sented at the hearing to indicate that the Intervenor had made any efforts to enforce the closed-shop provision of its contract, and inch- vidual employees have requested and been granted wage increases by the Employer without any discussion with the Intervenor, the record discloses that some time in April 1946, a representative of the Inter- venor discussed vacations with the acting general manager of the Employer, and vacations were granted. In addition, the Intervenor adduced evidence at the hearing to the effect that 27 employees of the Employer were members of the Intervenor, and had been paying dues to the Intervenor for from 5 years to 1 month. Furthermore, a request in writing to renegotiate wage rates was made by the In- tervenor in September 1946.4 Under all the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the Intervenor is still a functioning labor organi- zation capable of administering its contract.5 Inasmuch as the Petitioner's claim to representation was not as- serted until after the operative date of the automatic renewal clause, or "Mill B" date, of the contract between the Intervenor and the Employer, we find that this contract is a bar to a current determina- tion of representatives.`, We shall, therefore, dismiss the petition. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board hereby orders that the peti- tion for investigation and certification of representatives of employees of Memphis Butchers Association, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee, filed by United Packinghouse Workers of America, affiliated with the Con- gress of Industrial Organizations, be, and it hereby is, dismissed. MR. JAMES J. Ri vioLDS, JR., took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Order. "This request-was made pursuant to a clause in the contract permitting wage renegoti- ations 5 Matter of Miller Meters, ]nc, 71 N 1, R B 1331 . Matter of Ellis Canning Company, 67 N L R B 384 , Matter of Douglas Public Sc, sic Corp , 62 N L It B (351. 6 Matter of Portland Lumber Mills, 56 N L. R B. 1336. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation