Marcela M. Montilla, Complainant,v.Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 3, 2012
0120122287 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 3, 2012)

0120122287

10-03-2012

Marcela M. Montilla, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Marcela M. Montilla,

Complainant,

v.

Ray Mabus,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120122287

Agency No. 120025000929

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated April 6, 2012, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as an Event Coordinator at the Agency's Navy Exchange facility in Jacksonville, Florida.

On March 22, 2012, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of sex (female, pregnancy) when: (1) since August 31, 2011, her sick leave requests were denied by her manager; (2) on August 31, 2011, she was interviewed for the Visual Merchandise Manager position and during the interview her manager stated that "families are planned," and Complainant was not selected for the position; (3) since October 2011, her supervisors demanded to know her medical information upon Complainant's return from doctor's appointments; (4) around November 14, 2011, a supervisor called Complainant six times to ask her questions about work while she (Complainant) was attending a funeral, and upon her return to work she was verbally counseled about not doing her job; (5) on or around November 30, 2011, her supervisor told her to work on mannequins, although she was aware of Complainant's 15-pound lifting restrictions; and (6) in December 2011, the store manager and Complainant's manager did not allow Complainant to have her lunch break at 12:00 p.m. and Complainant was not allowed to sit down at the Star Card table although other associates were allowed to sit and take lunch whenever they wanted.

The Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to timely file a formal complaint. The Agency stated that Complainant received the notice of right to file on March 5, 2012, based on tracking information, but filed her complaint on March 22, 2012, beyond the required 15-day filing period.

The instant appeal filed. On appeal, Complainant states she did not receive the notice until March 7, 2012, and that she did not sign for anything.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106, which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so. Based on a thorough review of the record and consideration of the arguments on appeal, we conclude that the dismissal, due to the untimely filing of the formal complaint, was improper.

The record in this case contains insufficient evidence reflecting Complainant's receipt of the Notice on March 5, 2012. The record contains a FEDEX tracking print-out, which indicates a "delivery date" on March 5, 2012, without any further details of the address. The last location provided on the tracking information was Jacksonville, Florida, and Complainant lives in another city. We determine that there is no evidence, other than this generalized reference to delivery indicating that Complainant actually received the Notice. Where, as here, there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears the burden of obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned determination as to timeliness." Guy, v. Department of Energy, EEOC Request No. 05930703 (January 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)). In addition, in Ericson v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14, 1993), the Commission stated that "the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof to support its final decisions." See also Gens v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992). Complainant asserts she did not receive the envelope containing the Notice until March 7, 2012, and filed her formal complaint on March 22, 2012, within the requisite 15 days.

As it is undisputed that complainant filed her formal complaint on March 22, 2012, and there is inadequate evidence of complainant's receipt of the Notice, we find Complainant's formal complaint was timely filed.

The Agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint on the grounds that it was untimely filed is REVERSED. The complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 3, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120122287

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120122287