Long Mechanical, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Unpublished Board Decisions

Oct 5, 2012

07-CA-053473 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 5, 2012)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
LONG MECHANICAL, INC.
and Cases 07-CA-053473
07-CA-053572
LOCALS 98 AND 636, UNITED ASSOCIATION OF 07-CA-060379
JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE
PLUMBING AND PIPE FITTING INDUSTRY OF
THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO
DECISION AND ORDER
Statement of the Cases
On October 14, 2011, Long Mechanical, Inc. (the Respondent) and the Acting
General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board entered into a Formal
Settlement Stipulation, subject to the Board’s approval, providing for the entry of a
consent order by the Board and a consent judgment by any appropriate United States
Court of Appeals.1 The parties waived all further and other proceedings before the
Board to which they may be entitled under the National Labor Relations Act, as
amended, and the Board’s Rules and Regulations, and the Respondent waived its right
to contest the entry of a consent judgment or to receive further notice of the application
therefor.
The Formal Settlement Stipulation is approved and made a part of the record,
and the proceeding is transferred to and continued before the Board in Washington,
D.C., for the entry of a Decision and Order pursuant to the provisions of the Formal
Settlement Stipulation.
Based on the Formal Settlement Stipulation and the entire record, the Board
makes the following:
Findings of Fact
1. The Respondent’s business
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation with an office and showroom
in Northville, Michigan, has been engaged in the building and construction business as
a mechanical contractor.

1 The Charging Parties declined to enter into the Formal Settlement Stipulation. They
did not file an opposition with the Board.
2
During the fiscal year ending April 30, 2010, the Respondent, in conducting its
business operations described above, derived gross revenues in excess of $5 million.
During the fiscal year ending April 30, 2010, the Respondent, in conducting its
business operations described above, provided services valued in excess of $50,000 to
the Hampton Inn and a Veterans Administration hospital, which are enterprises in the
State of Michigan that are directly engaged in interstate commerce.
At all material times, the Respondent has been an employer engaged in
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act.
2. The labor organization involved
At all material times, each of the Charging Parties, Locals 98 and 636, United
Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of
the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO (also referred to collectively as the Union), has
been a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
3. The appropriate unit
The following employees of the Respondent, the unit, constitute a unit
appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b)
of the Act.
All full-time and regular part-time journeymen and apprentice plumbers,
pipe fitters, and pipe fitters/welders employed by the Respondent at or out
of its facility located at 190 East Main Street, Northville, Michigan; but
excluding all plumbing service employees, HVAC service employees,
sheet metal employees, sheet metal fab shop employees, truck drivers,
bathroom remodel employees, office clerical employees, managerial
employees, and guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
On September 2, 2010, a Board election was conducted among the employees
in the unit in Case 07-RC-023367, in which a majority of the employees cast ballots
designating the Charging Parties as representative of the unit for purposes of collective
bargaining.
On January 20, 2011, the Charging Parties were certified as the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
At all times since September 2, 2010, based on Section 9(a) of the Act, the
Charging Parties have been the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the
unit.
3
4. (a) On about May 3, 2011, the Respondent, by its agent James Long, at its St.
Catherine jobsite:
(1) bypassed the Charging Parties and dealt directly with its employees in the
unit concerning their terms and conditions of employment;
(2) solicited grievances from employees and impliedly promised to remedy them
in an effort to dissuade employees from supporting the Charging Parties;
(3) threatened employees with loss of employment and other adverse job
consequences if the Respondent signed a collective-bargaining agreement with
the Charging Parties;
(4) threatened to close its facility if the Respondent signed a collective-
bargaining agreement with the Charging Parties.
(b) On about May 5, 2011, the Respondent, by its agent James Long, at its
Marywood site:
(1) bypassed the Charging Parties and dealt directly with its employees in the
unit concerning their terms and conditions of employment;
(2) solicited grievances from employees and impliedly promised to remedy them
in an effort to dissuade employees from supporting the Charging Parties;
(3) threatened employees with loss of employment and other adverse job
consequences if the Respondent signed a collective-bargaining agreement with
the Charging Parties.
5. From about February 9 to about April 15, 2011, the Respondent laid off its
employees Daniel Brady and Alan LaBar.
6. From about February 9 to about March 4, 2011, the Respondent laid off its
employees Gabriel Ivan, Robert Rice, and Gary Steiner.
7. On about March 15, 2011, the Respondent sent its employee Max Dietrich
home prior to the completion of his shift.
8. From about March 17 to about April 5, 2011, the Respondent laid off its
employee Max Dietrich.
9. From about January 25 through February 8, 2011, the Respondent
discriminatorily assigned its employees Daniel Brady and Alan LaBar less favorable job
assignments and deprived them of jobsite equipment provided to other unit employees.
4
10. From about May 9 through about May 11, 2011, and from about May 16 to
about May 19, 2011, the Respondent laid off its employee Daniel Brady.
11. From about May 9 to about May 13, 2011, the Respondent laid off its
employee Alan LaBar.
12. From about May 18 to about May 19, 2011, the Respondent laid off its
employees Max Dietrich and Ronald Garant.
13. On about March 1, 2011, the Charging Parties, by letter to the Respondent,
requested all Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for the period of January 1, 2008 to
the present, and on about May 25, 2011, orally, and on about June 15, 2011, in writing,
the Charging Parties limited said request to the period of January 1, 2010 to the
present.
14. On about March 1, 2011, the Charging Parties, by letter to the Respondent,
requested all documents regarding unemployment benefits filed by the Respondent’s
employees and the resolution of such claims for the period of January 1, 2008 to the
present, and on about May 25 and June 15, 2011, the Charging Parties, in writing,
limited said request to the years 2008 and 2009.
15. On about March 1 and June 15, 2011, the Charging Parties, by letter to the
Respondent, requested the following information:
(a) all documents showing employee participants in any benefit plan sponsored
by the Respondent, and the plan or plans in which each such employee is
participating for the period of January 1, 2008 to the present;
(b) the personnel files for employees Charles Couchman, Josh Dyke, Jerry
Fannon, Bryan Hensley, Andrew Hocking, Gabe Ivan, Rob Makowiec, Jeffrey
Marion, Rob Rice, Mike Shuryan, and Gary Steiner for the period of January 1,
2008 to the present;
(c) all certified payroll records for any and all state and/or federal prevailing wage
jobs worked on by the Respondent for the period of January 1, 2008 to the
present;
(d) all workers’ compensation claims filed by employees, along with any
document showing the resolution of such claims, whether by settlement or
litigation, for the period from January 1, 2000 to the present.
16. On March 1, May 25, and June 15, 2011, the Charging Parties, by letter to
the Respondent, requested the following information:
(a) the personnel files of employees Mike Baran, Dan Brady, Charles Bigelow,
Jon Brenneman, Gary Hocking, J.D. Hocking, Doug Jarvis, Al LaBar, Lucas
5
Liedel, Chad Neur, Tony Ratcliffe, Paul Schuette, Albert Simcheck, Tom Stark,
and Dain Vettese for the period of January 1, 2008 to the present;
(b) all payroll records showing rates of pay, hours worked, and job classification
for the Respondent’s employees, or in the event that the Respondent’s payroll
records do not contain all of the data requested, all documents which include the
requested data for all employees for the period of January 1, 2008 to the present.
17. On about May 25 and June 15, 2011, the Charging Parties, by letter to the
Respondent, requested the following information:
(a) the personnel files for employees Max Dietrich and Ron Garant;
(b) breakdown of wage and fringe benefit package utilized/reported by the
Respondent for prevailing wage jobs.
18. The information requested by the Charging Parties as described in
paragraphs 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 is necessary for and relevant to the Charging Parties’
performance of their duties as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the
unit.
19. Since about March 1, 2011, the Respondent has:
(a) failed and refused to furnish the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraphs 15(b) and (c), 16(a), and 17(a) and (b);
(b) failed and refused to furnish the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 14 with respect to all documents regarding
unemployment benefits filed by the Respondent’s employees and the resolution
of such claims for the years 2008 and 2009;
(c) failed and refused to furnish the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 15(a) with respect to the documents showing employee
participants in any benefit plan sponsored by the Respondent, and the plan or
plans in which each such employee is participating for the period of January 1,
2008 to 2010;
(d) failed and refused to furnish the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 15(d) with respect to workers’ compensation claims filed
by its employees from the period of 2000 to March 2007;
(e) failed and refused to furnish the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 16(b), with respect to the payroll record for the
Respondent’s employees Charles Couchman, Josh Dyke, Jerry Fannon, Bryan
Hensley, Andrew Hocking, Gabe Ivan, Rob Makowiec, Jeffrey Marion, Rob Rice,
Mike Shuryan, and Gary Steiner.
6
20. From about March 1 to about June 13, 2011, the Respondent has
unreasonably delayed in furnishing the Charging Parties with the information described
in paragraph 16(b), with respect to the payroll record for the Respondent’s employees
Mike Baran, Dan Brady, Charles Bigelow, Jon Brenneman, Max Dietrich, Ron Garant,
Gary Hocking, J.D. Hocking, Doug Jarvis, Al LaBar, Lucas Liedel, Chad Neur, Tony
Ratcliffe, Paul Schuette, Albert Simcheck, Tom Stark, and Dain Vettese.
21. From about March 1 to about June 24, 2011, the Respondent has:
(a) unreasonably delayed in furnishing the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 15(a), with respect to all documents showing employee
participants in any benefit plan sponsored by the Respondent, and the plan or
plans in which each such employee is participating for the period of the year
2011;
(b) unreasonably delayed in furnishing the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 15(d), with respect to workers’ compensation claims filed
by its employees from the period of March 2007 to June 20, 2011;
(c) unreasonably delayed in furnishing the Charging Parties with the information
described in paragraph 13, with respect to the MSDS sheets for the period of
2010 and 2011.
22. The Respondent engaged in the conduct described in paragraphs 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, and 12 because of the named employees’ sympathies for and activities on
behalf of the Charging Parties, and to discourage employees from engaging in these or
other protected concerted activities.
23. The subjects set forth in paragraphs 4(a)(1) and 4(b)(1), 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, and
12 relate to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment of the unit and
are mandatory subjects for the purposes of collective bargaining.
24. The Respondent engaged in the conduct described in paragraphs 5, 6, 8,
10, 11, and 12 without prior notice to the Charging Parties and without affording the
Charging Parties a meaningful opportunity to bargain with respect to the layoffs and the
effects of the layoffs on the unit.
25. By the conduct described in paragraphs 4(a)(2), 4(a)(3), and 4(a)(4), and
4(b)(2) and 4(b)(3), the Respondent has been interfering with, restraining, and coercing
its employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed by Section 7 of the Act, in
violation of Section 8(a)(1)of the Act.
26. By the conduct described in paragraphs 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 22, the
Respondent has been discriminating in regard to the hire or tenure or terms and
7
conditions of employment of its employees, in violation of Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the
Act.
27. By the conduct described in paragraphs 4(a)(1), 4(b)(1), 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12,
19, 20, 21, and 24, the Respondent has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively
and in good faith with the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of its
employees, in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.

ORDER
Based on the above findings of fact, the Formal Settlement Stipulation, and the
entire record and pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as
amended, the National Labor Relations Board orders that
Long Mechanical, Inc., Northville, Michigan, its officers, agents, successors, and
assigns shall:
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Bypassing the Union and dealing directly with the unit employees regarding
their terms and conditions of employment. (Findings of Fact, paragraphs 4(a)(1),
4(b)(1)).2
(b) Soliciting grievances from employees and impliedly promising to remedy
them in an effort to dissuade employees from supporting the Charging Parties (also
referred to collectively as the Union). (Findings of Fact, paragraphs 4(a)(2) and 4(b)(2)).
(c) Threatening employees with loss of employment and other adverse job
consequences if the Respondent signed a collective-bargaining agreement with the
Charging Parties. (Findings of Fact, paragraphs 4(a)(3) and 4(b)(3)).
(d) Threatening to close its facility if it signed a collective-bargaining agreement
with the Charging Parties. (Findings of Fact, paragraph 4(a)(4)).
(e) Laying off employees because of their sympathies for and activities on behalf
of the Charging Parties, and to discourage employees from engaging in these or other
protected concerted activities. (Findings of Fact, paragraphs 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12).
(f) Laying off employees without prior notice to the Charging Parties and without
affording the Charging Parties a meaningful opportunity to bargain with respect to the
layoffs and the effects of the layoffs on the unit. (Findings of Fact, paragraphs 5, 6, 8,
10, 11, and 12).

2 Paragraph references in the Order are to the numbered paragraphs in the Findings of
Fact, above.
8
(g) Sending an employee home prior to the completion of his shift because of his
support and sympathies for or activities on behalf of the Union or any other labor
organization. (Findings of Fact, paragraph 7).
(h) Assigning its employees less favorable job assignments and depriving them
of jobsite equipment provided to other unit employees because of their sympathies for
and activities on behalf of the Charging Parties, and to discourage employees from
engaging in these or other protected concerted activities. (Findings of Fact, paragraph
9).
(i) Failing to furnish, or delaying in furnishing, the Union with any and all
documents and information it requested pertaining to wages, hours, and other terms
and conditions of employment of the unit, which are mandatory subjects of bargaining.
(Findings of Fact, paragraphs 19, 20, and 21).
(j) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing
employees in the exercise of the rights listed above.
(k) In any like or related manner discriminating in regard to the hire or tenure or
any other terms or conditions of employment of employees in order to discourage
support of or membership in the Union, or any other labor organization.
(l) In any like or related manner failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the Charging Parties as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions
of employment, in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. The unit is:
All full-time and regular part-time journeymen and apprentice plumbers,
pipe fitters, and pipe fitters/welders employed by us at or out of our facility
located at 190 East Main Street, Northville, Michigan; but excluding all
plumbing service employees, HVAC service employees, sheet metal
employees, sheet metal fab shop employees, truck drivers, bathroom
remodel employees, office clerical employees, managerial employees,
and guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to effectuate the policies of the
Act.
(a) Make Daniel Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, and Alan LaBar whole for
any loss of earnings and benefits suffered by reason of the discrimination against them,
by payment of backpay, and reimburse them for any out-of-pocket expenses they
incurred while searching for work, with interest computed in accordance with Board
policy in the amounts to be paid as follows:
9
50 percent of the amount opposite each name is due 30 days after approval of
this settlement stipulation by the Administrative Law Judge, and the remaining 50
percent is due 60 days after the approval of the Settlement Agreement by the
Administrative Law Judge.
Daniel Brady $7,112.32
Max Dietrich $3,709.18
Ronald Garant $522.88
Alan LaBar $12,079.68
(b) Make Gabriel Ivan, Gary Steiner, and Robert Rice whole for any loss of
earnings and benefits suffered as a result of its failure to bargain as described in
paragraphs 6 and 24, above, by payment of backpay, and reimburse them for any out-
of-pocket expenses they incurred while searching for work, with interest computed in
accordance with Board policy, in the amounts as follows:
50 percent of the amount opposite each name is due 30 days after approval of
this settlement stipulation by the Administrative Law Judge, and the remaining 50
percent is due 60 days after the approval of the settlement stipulation by the
Administrative Law Judge.
Gabriel Ivan $2,068.80
Robert Rice $2,395.20
Gary Steiner $1,432.00
(c) In the event that the discriminatees listed below are required to reimburse the
Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (MUIA) for unemployment compensation
received as a result of a loss of pay because of the alleged unfair labor practices in this
matter, pay over to the MUIA an amount equal to that which each alleged discriminatee
is required to reimburse the MUIA, not to exceed the amounts as follows:
Daniel Brady $2,172.00
Gabriel Ivan $1,086.00
Alan LaBar $2,172.00
Robert Rice $1,086.00
Gary Steiner $1,066.00
10
(d) Make Max Dietrich whole for any loss of earnings and benefits suffered as a
result of the Respondent’s sending him home prior to the completion of his shift, by
payment of backpay, with interest computed in accordance with Board policy.
(e) Reimburse Daniel Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, Gabriel Ivan, Alan
LaBar, Robert Rice, and Gary Steiner, amounts equal to the difference in taxes owed
upon receipt of a lump-sum payment ordered herein and taxes that would have been
owed had there been no discrimination.
(f) Submit the appropriate documentation to the Social Security Administration
so that when the backpay ordered herein is paid, it will be allocated to the appropriate
time periods as if no discrimination had occurred.
(g) Remove from all its files and records all references to the May 5, 2010 layoffs
of Daniel Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, and Alan LaBar, and advise each of
them, in writing, that it has done so and will not hold said action against him in the future
in any manner.
(h ) Remove from its files and records all references to the layoffs of Daniel
Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, Gabriel Ivan, Alan LaBar, Robert Rice, and Gary
Steiner, and all references to sending Max Dietrich home prior to the end of his shift on
March 15, 2011, and advise each of them, in writing, that it has done so and will not
hold said action against him in the future in any manner.
(i) On request, bargain in good faith with the Charging Parties concerning the
decisions to lay off Daniel Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, Gabriel Ivan, Alan
LaBar, Robert Rice, and Gary Steiner and the effects of those decisions on the unit.
(j) On request, meet and bargain collectively and in good faith with the Charging
Parties as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
(k) If not already provided, furnish the Charging Parties with the information
requested on March 1, May 25, and June 15, 2011.
(l) To remedy the Respondent’s failure, refusal, and unreasonable delay in
providing information to the Charging Parties, and to allow the Charging Parties the full
benefit of their certification, the certification year will be extended for six months from
January 20, 2012, if the Respondent provides the information in dispute to the Charging
Parties by that date. In the event that the Respondent does not provide the information
in dispute to the Charging Parties by January 20, 2012, the certification year will be
extended for six months from the date the Respondent provides the information in
dispute to the Charging Parties, in accordance with Mar-Jac Poultry Co., 136 NLRB 785
(1962).
(m) Within 14 days of service by the Region, post at its office in Northville,
Michigan, copies of the attached notice marked as Appendix A. Copies of the notice, on
11
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 7, after being signed by the
Respondent’s authorized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and
maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places, including all places where
notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the
Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other
material. Representatives of the Charging Parties shall have the right to inspect the
notice during the posting during business hours.
(n) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file with the Regional Director for
Region 7 a sworn certification of a responsible official attesting to the steps that the
Respondent has taken to comply with the Board Order, including the date and to whom
the attached notice marked as Appendix A was mailed.
Dated, Washington, D.C., October 5, 2012.
MARK GASTON PEARCE, CHAIRMAN
BRIAN E. HAYES, MEMBER
RICHARD F. GRIFFIN, JR., MEMBER
12
APPENDIX A
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board
An Agency of the United States Government
PURSUANT TO A STIPULATION PROVIDING FOR A BOARD ORDER AND A
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF ANY APPROPRIATE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
We are posting this notice to inform you of your rights guaranteed by the National Labor
Relations Act.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO:
Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act gives you as employees these rights:
Form, join, or assist a union;
Choose representatives to bargain with us on your behalf;
Act together with other employees for your benefit and
protection;
Choose not to engage in any of these protected activities.
We assure our employees that:
WE WILL NOT do anything that interferes with these rights.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner fail or refuse to meet and bargain
collectively and in good faith with Locals 98 and 636, United Association of Journeymen
and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and
Canada, AFL-CIO, (herein Union), as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative
of our employees in the following appropriate unit (unit):
All full-time and regular part-time journeymen and apprentice plumbers,
pipe fitters, and pipe fitters/welders employed by us at or out of our facility
located at 190 East Main Street, Northville, Michigan; but excluding all
plumbing service employees, HVAC service employees, sheet metal
employees, sheet metal fab shop employees, truck drivers, bathroom
remodel employees, office clerical employees, managerial employees,
and guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
13
WE WILL NOT threaten our employees that we will not employ union members or
adherents or threaten them with termination if they continue to organize on behalf of the
Union, or any other labor organization.
WE WILL NOT solicit grievances from our employees and promise to remedy them in
order to dissuade them from supporting the Union.
WE WILL NOT threaten our employees with loss of employment and other adverse job
consequences if we sign a collective bargaining agreement with the Union.
WE WILL NOT lay off any employee because of his support and sympathies for or
activities on behalf of the Union or any other labor organization.
WE WILL NOT threaten our employees that we will close our facilities if we sign a
collective-bargaining agreement with the Union.
WE WILL NOT send any employee home prior to the completion of his shift because of
his support and sympathies for or activities on behalf of the Union or any other labor
organization.
WE WILL NOT assign our employees less favorable job assignments or deprive them of
jobsite equipment provided to other unit employees because of their sympathies for and
activities on behalf of the Union, or to discourage employees from engaging in these or
other protected concerted activities.
WE WILL NOT bypass the Union and deal directly with the unit employees regarding
their terms and conditions of employment.
WE WILL NOT fail or delay to furnish the Union with any and all documents and
information it requested pertaining to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of
employment of the unit, which are mandatory subjects of bargaining.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce our
employees in the exercise of the rights listed above.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner discriminate in regard to the hire or tenure
or any other terms or conditions of employment of our employees in order to discourage
support of or membership in the Union, or any other labor organization.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner unilaterally lay off unit employees without
affording the Union prior notice and a meaningful opportunity to bargain regarding the
layoff and the effect of the layoff on unit employees.
WE WILL make whole unit employees Daniel Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, and
Alan LaBar for any loss of earnings and benefits suffered as a result of their layoffs, by
payment of backpay, with interest in according with Board policy.
14
WE WILL make whole bargaining unit employees Gabriel Ivan, Robert Rice, and Gary
Steiner, who have been recalled to work, by payment of backpay, with interest in
according with Board policy.
WE WILL remove from our files and records all references to the layoffs of Daniel
Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, Gabriel Ivan, Alan LaBar, Robert Rice, and Gary
Steiner, and all references to sending Max Dietrich home prior to the end of his shift on
March 15, 2011, and advise each, in writing, that we have done so and will not hold said
action against him in the future.
WE WILL, upon request, bargain with the Union concerning the decision to lay off
Daniel Brady, Max Dietrich, Ronald Garant, Gabriel Ivan, Alan LaBar, Robert Rice, and
Gary Steiner, and the effects of those decisions on the unit.
WE WILL, upon request, meet and bargain collectively and in good faith with the Union
as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
WE WILL, if not already provided, furnish the Union with the information it requested on
March 1, May 25, and June 15, 2011.
WE WILL acknowledge that that the certification year in Case 7-RC-023367 will be
extended for six months from January 20, 2012, if we provide the requested information
to the Union by January 20, 2012, or in the event we do not provide the requested
information to the Union by January 20, 2012, the certification year will be extended for
six months from the date we provide the requested information to the Union.
LONG MECHANICAL, INC.
(Employer)
DATE: ________________________ BY: ________________________________
(Representative) (Title)