Livier Alvarez, Complainant,v.Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 9, 2012
0120114163 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 9, 2012)

0120114163

02-09-2012

Livier Alvarez, Complainant, v. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.




Livier Alvarez,

Complainant,

v.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary,

Department of State,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120114163

Agency No. DOSF03211

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

Agency's decision dated August 3, 2011, dismissing her complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §

791 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as

a Passport Specialist at the Agency’s passport office in San Francisco,

California.

On February 18, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that

the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of disability

(hearing impairment) when there was a misunderstanding concerning her

leave while she was out on maternity leave, resulting in her receipt of a

letter demanding payment of $379.24 due to an over-payment while she was

out.1 In her formal complaint, Complainant stated she did not request

an interpreter to talk to her supervisor because she could comprehend

the supervisor by reading her lips.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal

followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2) states, in

pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails

to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. §

1614.106(b) which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint

within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so.

The record discloses that the latest alleged discriminatory event occurred

on September 14, 2010, when Complainant received the over-payment

demand letter, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO

Counselor until December 22, 2010, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no

persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time

limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. The Agency states that the

reasons Complainant gave for being late in contacting an EEO counselor

were that she was caring for a new baby and her parents. Such reasons are

not sufficient to waive the time limit for contacting an EEO counselor.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 9, 2012

__________________

Date

1 The Agency did not set forth the claim in its FAD. Additionally the

Agency failed to set forth specific dates in its decision. The information

was gleaned from the formal complaint and the EEO counselor’s

report. The Agency is cautioned as to leaving such information out of

its decisions.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120114163

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120114163