Kennametal, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 18, 194772 N.L.R.B. 837 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of KENNAMETAL, INC., EMPLOYER and DISTRICT 50, UNITED MINE WORKERS or AMERICA, PETITIONER Case No. 6-R-1558.-Decided February 18, 1947 Messrs. Smith, Buchanan and Ingersoll, by Messrs. Elmer E. Myers_ and Frank L. Seamans, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for the Employer. Mr. Joseph C. Gallagher. of Pittsburgh, Pa., for the Petitioner. Mr. Abraham F; a'nk, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Greens-- burg, Pennsylvania, on November 6,1946, before Joseph Lepie, hearing: officer. At the hearing the Employer moved to dismiss the petition on the grounds (1) that a year had not elapsed since the Board conducted a consent election in which the Petitioner participated and (2) that pending charges of unfair labor practices precluded a present deter- mination of representation. The hearing officer reserved ruling on the motion for the Board. For-reasons stated in Section III, infra,. the motion is hereby denied. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations- Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER Kennametal , Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation engaged in the• manufacture of cemented carbide products at its plants located in Latrobe and Kingston Station , Pennsylvania . In the 6-month period prior to November 7, 1946, the Employer purchased raw materials valued in excess of $10,000, all of which were shipped to its plants from outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. During the same period, 72 N. L. It. B., No. 135. 837 838 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the Employer shipped in excess of $50,000 worth of finished products outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the American -Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REI'RESIINT AT1ON The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive 'bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. With regard to the Employer's contention that the prior election is a bar to the instant proceeding it is apparent that approximately a year will have elapsed before the next election is held. In these cir- cumstances, we perceive no reason to delay a determination of representatives., The Employer's contention that pending charges of unfair labor practices preclude a determination of representation is without merit inasmuch as there is on file a waiver wherein the Petitioner agrees'not to make the subject matter of the charges the basis of an objection to any election or the results thereof. We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.3 IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, substantially in accord with the agreement of the parties, that all hourly-rated production and maintenance employees of the Employer's Latrobe and Kingston Station plants, including cafeteria employees and leadmen, but excluding laboratory technicians, clerical employees, guards, department managers, and all or any other super- visory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, disci- pline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effec- ' On February 11, 1946 , the Board conducted a consent election in substantially the same unit as herein sought by the Petitioner . The election resulted in a dismissal of the petition, inasmuch as the Petitioner , the only union participating, failed to secyre a majority of the votes cast 2 See Matter of New Enterprise Stone and Lime Company. 72 N L B B 308 The Employer , in its brief , argues that no evidence was introduced at the hearing to show that the Petitioner represents a substantial number of employees in the alleged appropriate unit. We find no merit in this contention See Matter of 0 D Jennings d Company, 68 N L. R . B 516 , and cases cited therein. KENNAMETAL, INC. 839, tively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. TIIE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The Employer requests , without objection from the Petitioner, that employees in the armed forces who fall within the appropriate unit be allowed to participate in the election . We are of the opinion that the facts in this case do not differ substantially from those in Matter of South, West Penn sylvania Pipe Lines ." Accordingly, we shall pro- vide for the mail balloting of employees in the armed forces who fall within the appropriate unit, subject to the conditions hereinafter mentioned. We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by sedlet ballot among employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. The Regional Director shall mail ballots to employees within the appro- priate unit on military leave, provided one or more of the parties, hereto, within 7 days after receipt of the Direction of Election, files with the Regional Director a list containing the names , most recent addresses , and work classifications of such employees . The Regional Director shall open and count the ballots cast by nail by employees, on military leave, provided that such ballots must be returned to and received by the Regional Office within 30 days from the date they were mailed to such employees by the Regional Director.-' DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur- poses of collective bargaining with Kennametal, Inc., Latrobe, Penn- sylvania, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted-as early as. possible, but not later than forty-five (45) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Direc- tor for the Sixth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the Na- 4 64 N L R B 1384. 6 A free interchange between the interested parties of information on the addresses and work categories of the employees to be voted by mail will be necessary in order to avoid challenges and post election objections Accordingly, the Board will make available to all interested parties any information of this nature furnished it by any other part} In the event that the patties should send the voters information or literature hearing directly or indirectly on the pending election, copies of all such documents should be simultaneously filed with the Regional Office for inspection by or transmittal to the other parties However, acceptance or transmittal of such literature by the Board's office is not to be construed as conferring immunity on the filing party in the event that objections are later interposed concerning its content The usual principles will apply a 84O DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD -,tional Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules-and Regulations- Series 4, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Sec- tion IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period imme- .diately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill For on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been -rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by District 50, United Mine Workers of America, for the purposes of collective bargaining.e 6 On February 12, 1947, the United Steelworkers of America , affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organization , filed a motion requesting that it be accorded a place on the ballot in the election hereinabove directed . Inasmuch as it appears from the foregoing -motion that the representation on which the Steelworkers bases its request was obtained subsequent to the date of the hearing , the motion is hereby denied . See Matter of United .Boat Service Corp, 55 N. L . R. B. 671. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation