Juan P. McRae, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 29, 2002
05a20869 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 29, 2002)

05a20869

08-29-2002

Juan P. McRae, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Juan P. McRae v. Department of the Army

05A20869

08-29-02

.

Juan P. McRae,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Request No. 05A20869

Appeal No. 01A10237

Agency No. DA #BPERFO9605G0260

Hearing No. 120-97-4179X

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Juan P. McRae (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to reconsider the decision in Juan

P. McRae v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A10237 (May 16, 2002). EEOC regulations provide that the

Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous decision

where the party demonstrates that: (1) the previous decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the

decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices or

operation of the agency. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

Complainant alleged discrimination based on race/color (black) and

reprisal when he was not selected for the position of Aerospace

Engineering Technician, GS-12. Following a hearing, the EEOC

Administrative Judge (AJ) found that the agency did not discriminate

against complainant, and the previous decision affirmed that decision.

Complainant claimed that the selectee had less relevant experience and

education. The agency stated that it chose the selectee based on his

broader background and demonstrated ability to perform successfully as a

team leader and that complainant's experience was more limited and in one

area of the work. In his request, complainant repeated his arguments on

appeal that he had superior qualifications, education, and experience

in the Division and that the agency failed to follow its affirmative

action plan. Complainant has not provided evidence to demonstrate that

the agency's reason for its selection decision was untrue or based on

discriminatory animus.

After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it

is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01A10237 (May 16, 2002) remains the Commission's

final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on

the decision of the Commission on a request for reconsideration.

STATEMENT OF COMPLAINANT'S RIGHTS - ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____08-29-02______________

Date