International Association of Machinists and Aerospace WorkersDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 27, 1970186 N.L.R.B. 890 (N.L.R.B. 1970) Copy Citation 890 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO; Local Lodge 598, Internation- al Association of Machinists and Aerospace Work- ers, AFL-CIO; H. C. Greene, president and member of Local Lodge 598, International Associa- tion of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO; Yancey E. Burns, secretary-treasurer and member of Local Lodge 598, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (Union Carbide Corporation ) and Lu- ther W. Schumate International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO; Local Lodge 598, Internation- al Association of Machinists and Aerospace Work- ers, AFL-CIO; H. C. Greene, president and member of Local Lodge 598, International Associa- tion of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO; Yancey E. Burns, secretary-treasurer and member of Local Lodge 598, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (Union Carbide Corporation ) and John W. Godbey; Dewitt Deel ; Charles C. Dawson; Dalton Midkiff and Union Carbide Corporation, Party in Interest . Cases 9-CB-1510-1, 9-CB-1510-2, 9-CB-1510-3, 9-CB-1510-4, 9-CB-1519-1, 9-CB-1519-2, 9-CB-1519-3, and 9-C'B-1519-4 November 27, 1970 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION BY MEMBERS FANNING, BROWN, AND JENKINS On January 22, 1970, the National Labor Relations Board issued its Decision and Order in the above- entitled proceeding,' finding that the alleged unfair labor practices occurred more than 6 months prior to 1 I80 NLRB No 135 the filing of the charge and, therefore, the issuance of a complaint was time-barred under Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. Accordingly, the Board found it unnecessary to reach the underlying issues of law in the case and ordered that the complaint therein be dismissed in its entirety. Thereafter, on February 2, 1970, Union Carbide Corporation filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Decision and Order, requesting that the Board, upon reconsideration, rescind its dismissal of the complaint and consider and decide the underlying issues of law and fact presented in the complaint. On February 10, 1970, the Charging Parties filed a Motion for Reconsideration, concurring and joining in the motion filed by Union Carbide Corporation on all grounds set forth therein. Respondents filed no response. On February 20, 1970, the National Labor Rela- tions Board issued a notice in the above-entitled proceeding, advising the parties that the Board had decided to reconsider its Decision and Order dated January 22, 1970, in light of the motions filed by Union Carbide Corporation and the Charging Parties. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with these cases to a three- member panel. We have duly reconsidered our original Decision in light of the Motions for Reconsideration and, upon the entire record herein, including the said Motions, we adhere to our view that the issuance of a complaint is time-barred under Section 10(b) of the Act. Accordingly, we hereby reaffirm our Order dismissing the complaint in its entirety. 186 NLRB No. 138 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation