Harold Walker, Complainant,v.Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 3, 2011
0120110108 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 3, 2011)

0120110108

03-03-2011

Harold Walker, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Harold Walker,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120110108

Agency No. 200305802010104162

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated September 17, 2010, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Medical Instrument Technician at the Agency's Michael DeBakey VA

Medical Center facility in Houston, Texas.

On August 19, 2010, Complainant filed a formal EEO complaint alleging that

the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of sex (male)

when, on June 7, 14, and 31, 2010, a co-worker created a discriminatory

hostile environment for him by being unprofessional, disruptive and

popping her chewing gum loudly. Complainant also alleged that on July 21,

2010, the same employee was again unprofessional, disruptive, popping

her gum and talking on the telephone loudly.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. The instant appeal followed

without comment from Complainant.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Under the regulations set forth at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614, an agency shall

accept a complaint from an aggrieved employee or applicant for employment

who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency

because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling

condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal

sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one

who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or

privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Dep't of the

Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). If complainant

cannot establish that s/he is aggrieved, the agency shall dismiss a

complaint for failure to state a claim. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

The Commission has held that where, as here, a complaint does not

challenge an agency action or inaction regarding a specific term,

condition, or privilege of employment, the claim of harassment may

survive if it alleges conduct that is sufficiently severe or pervasive

to alter the conditions of the complainant's employment. See Harris

v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 23 (1993). The Commission finds

that Complainant's allegations are insufficient to state a claim of

harassment or hostile work environment.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFORMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the

request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as

stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 3, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120110108

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120110108