Hall Manufacturing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsApr 1, 194240 N.L.R.B. 14 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter Of HALL MANUFACTURING CO. and UNITED FARM EQUIPMENI WORKERS, LOCAL 132 Case No. R-3613.-Decided April 1, 1942 Jurisdiction : small farm tool manufacturing industry: Investigation and Certification of .Representatives : existence of question : Com- pany refused to accord petitioner recognition ; contract renewed after notice of petitioner's claim to representation, no bar to ; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all hourly and piece-work em- ployees engaged in maintenance and production, including firemen and work- ing foremen, but excluding office employees (including clerical and office employees working in the plant), full-time supervisory employees (including the production manager, the superintendent, and non-working foremen), and guards. Mr. H. Y. Simmons, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for the Company. Mr. Seymour Siporin, of Rock Island, Ill., and Mr. C. W. Hobbie, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for the United. Mr. John H. Cummings, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for the, I. A. M. Mr. Louis Cokin, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On January 31, 1942. United Farm Equipment Workers, Local 132, herein' called the United, filed with the Regional Director for the Eighteenth Region (Minneapolis, Minnesota) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representa- tion of employees of Hall Manufacturing Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa, herein'called the Company, and requesting an investigation and cer- tification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat.449, herein called the Act.: On February 27, 1942, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3', of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered 'an investigation grid authorized the Regional Director to' conduct it - nd to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. 40 N. L R B, No 2. 14 11 HALL MANUFACTURING CO. 15 On March 2, 1942, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of, which were duly served upon the Company and the United and upon Local No. 831, International Association of Machinists, herein called the I. A. M, a labor organization. claiming to represent employees directly affected by the investigation. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on March 10, 1942, at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, before Guy Farmer, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Company, the United, and the I. A. M. were repre- sented and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. At- the commencement df the hearing the Trial Examiner granted a motion of the United to amend its petition to set forth its title correctly. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings, on other mo- tions and on objections to the admission of, evidence. The Board has reviewed these rulings and finds that no prejudicial errors were com- mitted. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Hall Manufacturing Co. is an Iowa corporation with its principal place of business at Cedar Rapids, Iowa,\where it is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of small farm tools. During 1941 the Company purchased raw materials valued at about $250,000, approxi- mately 90 percent of which was shipped to it from points outside the State of Iowa. During the same-period, the Company sold finished products valued at about $538,000, approximately 87 percent of which was shipped by it to points outside the State of Iowa. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED United Farm Equipment Workers, Local 132, is a labor organiza- tion` affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admit- ting to membership employees of the Company. Local No. 831, International Association of Machinists, is a labor ,organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admit- ting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On -March 4, 1941, the I. A. M. and the Company entered into a 1-year exclusive bargaining contract. The contract provided that at .the expiration of the first year it should remain in full force and effect ,16 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD from year to year thereafter unless either party'thereto gave notice, at least 30 days in advance of any annual expiration date, of a desire to terminate. On January 28, 1942, the United, claiming to represent a majority of the Company's employees, requested recognition as their exclusive bargaining representative. The Company denied this request. The petition herein was filed on January 31, 1942. No notice of termination was given under the contract by either party thereto, It is apparent that the contract does not constitute a bar to a present determination of representatives inasmuch as the United made its claim to represent a majority of the employees and filed the petition herein prior to the automatic renewal date of the contract. A statement of the Regional Director, introduced into evidence at the hearing, shows that the United represents a substantial number- of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate,.' ' We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has. arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States andI) I 1 '11 1 tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Company, the United, and the I. A. M. agree, and we find, that all hourly and piece-work employees of the Company engaged in maintenance and production, including-,firemen and working fore- men, but excluding office employees (including clerical and office em- ployees working in the plant), full-time supervisory employees (in- cluding the production manager, the superintendent, and non-work- ing foremen), and guards, constitute a unit appropriate for the pur- poses of collective bargaining.' We further find that such unit will insure to employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise will effectuate the policies of the Act. ' The Regional Director reported that the United presenied 451membership, application ay roll ofcards bearing the signatures of persons whose names appear € oi the Company 's 'pay' January 24 , 1942 There are 82 employees in the appropriate unit ' The I. A. M . stated at the hearing that it relied on its contract with the Company as evidence of its repre- sentation of employees. 2 This is substantially the same unit as is covered by the contract between the Company and the I. A M HALL MANUFACTURING CO. VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES 17 We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot. The United stated that in the event the Board directed an election it desired that a pay roll as of the date of the hearing be used to deter- mine eligibility to vote. In the absence of reasons for departure from our usual custom we shall direct that the employees of the Com- pany eligible to vote in the election shall be those within the appro- priate. unit who ti ere employed during the pay-roll, period imme- diately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Hall Manufacturing Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 2. All hourly and piece-work employees of the Company engaged in maintenance and production, including firemen and working fore- men, but excluding office employees (including clerical and office em- ployees working in the plant), full-time supervisory employees (in- cluding the production manager, the superintendent, and non-working; foremen), and guards, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act and pursuant to Article III, Section 8,, of National' Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the' investigation ordered by the Board ,to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Hall Manufacturing Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and, supervision of the Regional' Director for the- Eighteenth' Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, 455771-42-vol. 40-2 . 18 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD among all hourly and piece-work employees of the Company engaged in maintenance and production who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding ,the date of this Direction , includ- ing firemen , working foremen, and employees who did not work dur- ing such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding office employees (including clerical and office employees working in the plant ), full-time supervisory employees (including the production manager, the superintendent , and non-work- ing foremen ), guards, and employees who have since quit or been dis- charged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Farm Equipment Workers, Local 132, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations , or by Local No. 831 , Interna- tional Association of Machinists, affiliated with the American Federa- tion of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. In the Matter. of HALL MANUFACTURING Co. and UNITED FARM EQUIPMENT WonicERS LOCAL 132 Case No. B-3613 CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES April 28, 1942 On April 1, 1942, the National Labor Relations Board issued a Decision and Direction of Election in the above-entitled proceedings.' Pursuant to the Direction of Election, an election by secret ballot was conducted on April 16, 1942, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighteenth Region (Minneapolis, Minnesota ). On April 18, 1942, the Regional Director, acting pur- suant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, issued and duly served upon the parties an Election Report on the ballot. No objections to the conduct of the ballot or the Election Report have been filed by any of.the parties. As to the balloting and its results, the Regional Director reported as follows : Total on eligibility list----------------------------------- 77 Total ballots cast---------------------------------------- 74 Total ballots challenged---------------------------------- None Total blank ballots--------------------------------------- None Total void ballots---------------------------------------- None Total valid vote's counted------------------------------ 74 rotes cast for United Farm Equipment Workers Local,132 (C. I. 0 )---------------------------------------------- 71 Votes cast for Local 831, International Association of Ma- chinists (A F. of L.)--------------------- ------------- None Votes cast for neither------------------------------------ 3 By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, 140NLRB14. 40 N L R B, No 2a. 19 20 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that United Farm Equipment Workers, Local 132, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, has been designated and selected by a majority of all hourly and piece- work employees of Hall Manufacturing Co., Cedar Rapids, Iowa., including firemen and working foremen, but excluding office em- ployees (including clerical and office employees working in the plant), full-time supervisory employees (including the production manager, the superintendent, and non-working foremen), and guards, as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining, and that, pursuant to Section 9 (a) of the Act, United Farm Equipment Work- ers, Local 132, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organiza- tions, is the exclusive representative of all such employees for the purposes of collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, and other conditions of employment. 1 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation