01985807
03-30-1999
Greg E. Conde, Appellant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.
Greg E. Conde v. Department of the Army
01985807
March 30, 1999
Greg E. Conde, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01985807
) Agency No. 9805I0160
Louis Caldera, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Army, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DECISION
On July 21, 1998, appellant filed a timely appeal from a final agency
decision (FAD)received by him on July 7, 1998. Based on a review of
the record, we find that the agency improperly dismissed appellant's
complaint, pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a), for
failure to state a claim. Appellant alleged that he was subjected to
discrimination on the basis of retaliation when:
The agency allowed unusual and arbitrary denial for use of sick days
against him;
Appellant was subject to video taping without his consent or explanation;
Appellant was assigned to a work location without regard for his safety;
Appellant received an unfavorable rating;
Appellant suffers from unfair working conditions by being required to
work alone on a project that needs more than one person in order to
accomplish it within the required time frame; and
An agency official was very partial towards management in the treatment
of his complaints;
The agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim because
appellant alleged reprisal as his only basis, but had not engaged in
any prior EEO activity.
On appeal, appellant argues that he was discriminated against based on
his race (unspecified).
The Commission gives broad application to the court's decision to allow a
complainant to add bases to his complaint in Sanchez v. Standard Brands,
Inc., 431 F.2d 455, 465 (5th Cir. 1970). Under Sanchez, complainants are
given liberal latitude to clarify the bases of discrimination in their
charges, and to add bases of discrimination after filing their charges.
The Sanchez court explained that there are at least three reasons why a
complainant may fail to identify a basis of discrimination in a complaint.
First, a complainant may not be aware of an employer's motivation.
Second, a complainant may not fully comprehend the distinction between
bases. Finally, a complainant may be unschooled and unsophisticated in
the use of forms.
Applying Sanchez, the Commission has held that a complainant may allege
discrimination on all applicable bases, including sex, race, national
origin, color, religion, age, disability and reprisal, and may amend
his or her complaint at any time, including at the hearing, to add or
delete bases without changing the identity of the claim. See Dragos
v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940563 (January
19, 1995); Edwards v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05910830
(Dec. 19, 1991).
Accordingly, the Commission finds that appellant may change the basis of
his complaint to race, and the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint
for failure to state a claim is REVERSED. The complaint of discrimination
based on race is hereby REMANDED to the agency for further processing
in accordance with the Order below.
ORDER (E1092)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant
that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to
appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant
of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days
of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise
resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision
without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty
(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy
of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights
must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.
The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to
the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the
appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you
have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some
jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner
suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your
civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN
THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision
or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,
you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR
DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your
appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME
AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY
HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME
AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of
your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
March 30, 1999
____________________________
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations