Greene County Chapter American Red CrossDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 25, 1975221 N.L.R.B. 776 (N.L.R.B. 1975) Copy Citation 776 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Greene County , Chapter American Red Cross and Springfield Regional Red Cross Blood Center 1 and Service and Hospital Employees Union Local 50, AFL-CIO/CLC,1 Petitioner. Case l7-RC-7767 November 25, 1975 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION BY CHAIRMAN MURPHY AND MEMBERS FANNING AND JENKINS Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, a hearing was held before Hearing Officer R. E. Weghorst. Following the hearing and pursuant to Section 102.67 of the National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended, this case was transferred to the Board for decision, Thereafter, briefs were filed by the Employer and the Petitioner. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. The Board has reviewed the Hearing Officer's rulings made at the hearing and finds that they are free from prejudicial error. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds: 1. The Greene County Chapter and the Spring- field Regional Red Cross Blood Center are affiliates of the American National Red Cross headquartered in Washington, D.C. Both the Chapter and the Blood Center are nonincorporated associations with tax- exempt status.2 The Employer provides blood serv- ices to meet the requirements of approximately 54 hospitals located in southwest Missouri, Arkansas, and Kansas. The Employer has contracts for the supplying of blood with these hospitals, which include approximately 18 county, state, or Federal government operated hospitals. The Employer also supplies blood to the military hospital at Fort Leonard Wood. There is no contract involved in the furnishing of blood to the military installation. The standard contract requires the participating hospital to reimburse the Employer in part for the cost of collecting, processing, and distributing the blood at set rates per unit for the various kinds of blood products. The Employer's medical director may confer with doctors in the hospitals regarding the type of blood most helpful to the patient consistent with the availability of the supply of blood. The Employer performs certain tests on the blood before it is delivered to the hospital. The Employer ships plasma to Squibb, a pharmaceutical firm, which ships it out of state. The transaction is handled between the American National Red Cross and Squibb, and the Employer receives a credit memo from its national organization for the amount of plasma shipped. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, the amount of credit received for plasma was $89,510. The Employer also exchanges blood credits with other Red Cross centers and with the American Association of Blood Banks. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, the Employer had gross income of $595,067, and of that amount $226,028 was derived from interstate sources. The Employer contends that it is a health care institution within the meaning of Section 2(14) of the Act. In the alternative, the Employer contends that if it is not considered a health care institution, then the Board should decline jurisdiction for the reason that the activities of the Employer here have no substan- tial impact upon interstate commerce. We reject both of the Employer's contentions and we find that the Employer's operations and impact on commerce are sufficient to warrant the Board's assertion of jurisdic- tion.3 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain employees of the Employer. 3. A question affecting commerce exists concern- ing the representation of certain employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9(c)(1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. 4. Petitioner seeks representation of a unit of approximately seven or eight dispatchers. The Employer maintains that such a unit is inappropriate because the dispatchers have no separable communi- ty of interest apart from the nurses with whom they spend a substantial portion of their working hours and under whose supervision they perform their duties while in the field. The medical director, Dr. Lewis, testified that seven or eight employees are classified as dispatchers. Normally one dispatcher is regularly assigned to the "milk run," which is the regular delivery of blood to the various hospitals. During the day two dispatchers will be assigned to the Center and one will be assigned to the mobile blood unit. Occasionally, when two mobile units are in operation, only one dispatcher will be assigned to the Center. There are 1 The names of the Employer and Petitioner appear as amended at the operations. hearing 3 San Diego Blood Bank, 219 NLRB No 13 (1975); American National 2 The parties stipulated that the Chapter and the Blood Center are a Red Cross, District of Columbia Chapter, 211 NLRB 587 (1974) single Employer Hereinafter the term Employer will be used to describe the 221 NLRB No. 140 GREENE COUNTY AMERICAN RED CROSS , ET AL. 777 three part-time dispatchers who basically cover the evening .and weekend shifts.4 The dispatchers are all responsible to the chief dispatcher, . Gott, an admitted supervisor. As previ- ously stated, one driver is assigned to the job of delivering blood to the various hospitals. He takes a certain amount of blood with him and stocks the hospitals in the area he covers for the day. This is the only job this person does. When assigned to the Center, the dispatchers answer the phone, take orders for blood from the hospitals, and pack the blood and take it to hospitals, bus stations, and airports. They assist the chief dispatcher in stocking and in taking inventory of the storeroom, keep the blood supply, and rotate it properly. When they take the blood to the various destinations, they use a Red Cross van. When in the field, the dispatcher drives the truck to the site and helps set up the drawing center, by unloading the truck and taking in supplies and equipment such as beds. Frequently volunteers will assist him. During the actual blood drawing, he is responsible for sealing and refrigerating the full bags. When the blood drawing is finished, he directs the volunteers to disassemble the equipment. He then loads the truck and is responsible for getting the blood back to the Center. When the dispatcher is in the field, he is responsible to the head nurse. However, he has no contact with donors and receives no medical training. In fact, the only license the dispatcher is required to have is a chauffeur' s license. In view of the above, we find that no community of interest between the dispatchers and the nurses exists, which would render a separate unit of dispatchers inappropriate. Accordingly, we find that the following employees constitute a unit appropriate for the purpose of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act: All blood dispatchers employed by the Employer, excluding all other employees, guards and super- visors within the meaning of the Act. [Direction of Election and Excelsior footnote omitted from publication.] 4 The Employer maintains 24-hour-a-day blood delivery service The manager of the Blood Center estimated that about 75 percent of the dispatchers ' time is spent in the field under the direction of the head nurse In view of Dr. Lewis' rather detailed testimony , the estimation by the manager seems unrealistic. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation