General Motors Corp.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 24, 1943

54 N.L.R.B. 55 (N.L.R.B. 1943)

In the Matter of FRIGIDAIRE DivisioN, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
and UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA,
LOCAL 801
Case No. 9-11-1213.-Decided December 24, 1943
Messrs. Harry M. Hogan and Harry S. Benjamin, Jr., by Mr. Harry
S. Benjamin , Jr., of Detroit, Mich ., for the Company.
Messrs. Robert N. Elsner, Henry Fiering, and Donald McNally, all
of Dayton , Ohio, for the Union.
Mr. David V. Easton, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by United Electrical, Radio & Machine
`Yorkers of America, Local 801,1 herein called the Union, alleging
that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of Frigidaire Division, General Motors Cor-
poration, Dayton, Ohio, herein called the Company, the National La-
bor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due
notice before Benjamin E. Cook, Trial Examiner.- Said hearing was
held at Dayton, Ohio, on November 18, 1943. The Company and the
Union appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to
be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce
evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings are
free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were
afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
General Motors Corporation , a Delaware corporation , with is prin-
cipal offices located in New York City, and Detroit , Michigan, fune-
I Although the petition omits the number of the local involved herein, the record indi-
cates that "Local 801" is, in fact , the local concerned. All papers in this proceeding are
hereby amended in accordance with such designation.
54 N. L. R. B., No. 11.
55
56 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
tions with several unincorporated divisions; among which is the
Frigidaire Division with which we are concerned herein. The Frig-
idaire Division has its main office in Dayton, Ohio, and operates two
plants in both Dayton and Moraine, Ohio, where it manufactures
products and equipment for the armed forces of the United States
and its allies. Approximately 50 percent of the productive materials
and fabricated or partially fabricated articles used in the manufactur-
ing and fabricating operations of the Frigidaire Division, is obtained
from points outside the' State of Ohio; and more than 50 percent of
the manufactured products of the Frigidaire Division is shipped to
points outside the State of Ohio. The Company admits that it is
engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Re-
lations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, Local
801, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial
Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On or about August 23, 1943, the Union requested recognition from
the Company as the bargaining representative of certain of its em-
ployees; on or about August 27, 1943, the Company refused such
recognition.
A statement of the Field Examiner, introduced into evidence at
the hearing, indicates the Union represents a substantial number of
employees in the voting unit hereinafter found appropriate?
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
2 The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted five designation cards, all of
which bore apparently genuine, original signatures ; that the names of five persons appear-
ing upon said cards were listed on a current pay roll of the Company which contained the
names of seven employees in the voting unit hereinafter found appropuate The record
indicates that there are presently eight employees in said voting unit
The Company contends that ( a) three of the designations are undated and should not be
counted, and (b) if this contention is correct, the Union has failed to indicate an interest
in these employees sufficient to warrant the entertainment of this proceeding. While desig-
nations beaung current dates are preferable, we have consistently accepted as a part of
the representation showing undated cards that appear to bear genuine signatures We
perceive no reason for adopting a strict>?i rule, since the Statement Concerning Claims of
Authorization for Purposes of Representation is merely a part of an administrative investi-
gation conducted in order to determine whethei or not these is sufficient evidence upon
which to entertain a petition . This is an administrative matter , wholly within the discre-
tion of the Boaid, and for this reason is not subject to attack by the parties to the pio-
ceeding See Matter of hill Stores, Inc., 39 N. L R. B 874 Accordingly, the contentions
of the Company are without merit
FRIGIDAIRE DIVISION 57
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT; THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
On April 20, 1943, the Board issued a Decision and Direction of
Election 3 in which it found that all tool designers of the Company
at Plant No. 1 constituted an appropriate unit.4 Thereafter, on May
15, 1943, the Union was certified as the collective bargaining repre-
sentative of the employees in that unit.
In the instant proceeding the Union seeks to represent all em-
ployees at Plant No. 1 of the Company engaged as tool design
trainees, tool design detailers, and blueprint operators. As in the
prior proceeding, the Company contends that a unit confined to
Plant No. 1 is not appropriate, and that because of its administrative
set-up, the employees in the classifications sought by the Union
herein engaged at all four plants of the Company should be included
within the unit. The record indicates that the Union has confined
its organizational activities to Plant No. 1, and has not attempted
to organize similarly classified employees in the other three plants.
Accordingly, for reason stated in our prior Decision,5 we shall con-
fine the voting group to those employees of the Company engaged as
tool design trainees, tool design detailers, and blueprint operators,
at Plant No. 1.
The record does not clearly indicate whether or not the Union
desires that these employees be constituted a separate unit, or added
to the unit which it already represents. However, the evidence dis-
closes a close functional relationship between the tool designers and
the employees involved herein, both groups being employed in the
tool designing department and constituting an integral part of the
tool designing process. Under these circumstances, we are of the
opinion that the employees concerned herein may properly be in-
cluded within the unit of tool designers presently represented by the
Union herein if they so desire. Accordingly, we shall direct that
an election be held among all employees of the Company engaged as
tool design trainees, tool design detailers, and blueprint operators,
at Plant No. 1, excluding all supervisory employees with authority
to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes
in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, to
determine whether or not they desire to be included within the unit
c,f tool designers engaged at Plant No. 1.
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
Jfattei of Frtigida, re Dwtision, General Motors Corporation, 48 N L R B 1404
The original Decision and Direction of Election inadvertently included "all employees
in the tool designing department of Plant No. 1." This error was corrected by an amend-
ment which confined the unit to tool designers at said plant.
3 See footnote 3, supra.
58 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ployees in the voting group hereinbefore described, who were em-
ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date
of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and
additions set forth in the Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of the National
Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations, Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain represent-
atives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Frigidaire
Division, General Motors Corporation, Dayton, Ohio,.an election by
secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later
than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the
direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Ninth
Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Rela-
tions Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said
Rules and Regulations, among all employees of the Company at
Plant No. 1 engaged as tool design trainees, tool design detailers, and
blueprint operators, excluding all supervisory employees with au-
thority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect
changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such
action, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately
preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did
not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on
vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the
armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person
at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or
been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated
prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they.
desire to be represented by United Electrical, Radio & Machine
Workers of America, Local 801, affiliated with the Congress of In-
dustrial Organizations , for the purposes of collective bargaining.