Frank E. Watson, JR, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 28, 2007
0120080176 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 28, 2007)

0120080176

12-28-2007

Frank E. Watson, JR, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Frank E. Watson, JR,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080176

Agency No. 1G701002907

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

By Notice of Appeal postmarked October 9, 2007, complainant filed an

appeal with this Commission from the August 2, 2007 final agency decision

(FAD) dismissing his EEO complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

The record indicates that the FAD was received by complainant by August

9, 2007. A review of the FAD reveals that the agency properly advised

complainant that he had thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of its

final decision to file his appeal with the Commission. Therefore, in

order to be considered timely, complainant had to file his appeal no

later than September 10, 2007.1 Complainant has not offered adequate

justification for an extension of the applicable time limit for filing

his appeal. Accordingly, complainant's October 9, 2007 appeal is hereby

dismissed. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(c).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 28, 2007

__________________

Date

1 It appears that complaint was confused by the acknowledgement letter

dated July 27, 2007, which explained to him what would happen if the

complaint was accepted for investigation. On August 14, 2007, complainant

sought a hearing, although he had already received the agency's decision

dismissing the complaint. On September 13, 2007 the EEOC dismissed his

hearing request as premature. On October 3, 2007 the EEOC again dismissed

the matter, accepting the agency's motion to dismiss. Complainant does not

explain why he did not file an appeal as set forth in the final agency

decision. His request for a hearing, coming after he received the FAD,

does not excuse the untimely filing of his appeal.

??

??

??

??

2

0120080176

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120080176