Farmers Produce Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 17, 194772 N.L.R.B. 714 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of E. M. GOLDBERG, D/B/A FARMERS PRODUCE COMPANY, EIIPLo1'1 R and LOCAL 19, FooD, TOBACCO, AGRICULTURAL AND ALLIED WORKERS or AMERICA, CIO, PETITIONER Case No. 15-R-1887.-Decided Febiuac,y 17, 1947 Messrs. David Hanover and E. M. Goldberg, of Memphis, Tenn., for the Employer. Mr. John Mack Dyson, of Memphis, Tenn., for the Petitioner. Miss Muriel J. Levor, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon an amended petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Memphis, Tennessee, on December 19,1946, before Gerald A. Brown, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER E. M. Goldberg, doing business under the name of Farmers Produce Company, is engaged in the processing of eggs and the dressing of poultry, and the sale of these products at wholesale. The Employer's only plant is located at Memphis, Tennessee. During the past year, the Employer purchased raw materials, consisting chiefly of eggs and poultry, valued at approximately $300,000, of which 95 percent came to the plant from points outside Tennessee. During the past year the Employer's sales amounted to approximately $450,000, of which about $5,000 represented sales to customers located outside the State of Tennessee. 72 N L R. B, No. 123. 714 FARMERS PRODUCE COMPANY 715 We find, contrary to the contention of the Employer, that the Em- ployer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations , claiming to represent employees of the Employer.' III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. TIIE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Employer and the Petitioner agree that production and main- tenance employees at the Employer's Memphis, Tennessee, plant, ex- cluding office clerical employees, watchmen, salesmen, and supervisory employees, constitute an appropriate bargaining unit. They disagree with respect to the unit placement of truck drivers. The Employer would exclude and the Petitioner include the truck drivers. The truck drivers are engaged in delivering poultry and eggs from the plant to the Employer's customers. They do no- production work. Plant production employees receive hourly wages; truck drivers are salaried employees. Production employees work irregular hours at the plant, and their hours are determined by the varying amounts of poultry and eggs to be processed. Truck drivers work irregular and different hours, and their hours are determined by the number and location of customers to be served and the amount of products to be delivered. One truck driver owns his own truck, for the use of which he receives compensation. Truck drivers were excluded from coverage under the recently expired contract between the Employer and the Meat Cutters covering the production and maintenance workers at the plant. In view of the diverse duties, interests, and conditions of employment of the truck drivers, the disagreement of the parties, and 'The Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher workmen of North America, Local No 348, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called the Meat Cutters, also served with notice did not appear at the hearing A representative of the Meat Cutters informed the hearing officer that the Meat Cutters, which represented the emplovee^ herein concerned nuclei a contract that expired in August 1946, no longer claimed to repie- sent these ernplevees 716 - DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the previous bargaining history, we will exclude truck drivers from the unit.' We find that all production and maintenace employee's at the Em- ployer's Memphis, Tennessee, plant, excluding office clerical employees, watchmen, salesmen, truck drivers, and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur- poses of collective bargaining with E. M. Goldberg, d/b/a Farmers Produce Company, Memphis, Tennessee, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Fifteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 4, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or-on vacation or temporarily laid off, and in- cluding employees in the armed forces of the United States who pre- sent themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been re- hired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Local 19, Food, Tobacco, Agricultural and Allied Workers of America, CIO, for the purposes of collective bargaining. 8 Matter of Thomasville Chair Company , 65 N. L. A. B. 1290; Matter of West Virginia Armature Company, 65 N. L. R. B. 1015. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation