Ezzard Batiste, Complainant,v.Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 23, 2002
01A05315_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 23, 2002)

01A05315_r

08-23-2002

Ezzard Batiste, Complainant, v. Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Ezzard Batiste v. Department of the Air Force

01A05315

August 23, 2002

.

Ezzard Batiste,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. James G. Roche,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A05315

Agency No. AL-900000-728

Hearing No. 380-98-8282X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal from an agency final order in the above-captioned matter.

In his complaint, complainant claimed discrimination and harassment on

the bases of race (black), national origin (African American), disability

(back), and in reprisal for prior protected activity, regarding the

following incidents:

In October 1997, complainant's supervisor accused him of altering the

e-mail setting and treated him disrespectfully; and

The agency improperly denied complainant's repeated requests (from June

1997 to October 1997) for a suitable chair as a reasonable accommodation

for his lumbar spine disorder.

The agency transferred the complaint to an EEOC Administrative Judge

(AJ), who conducted a hearing, and rendered a decision on May 9, 2000.

Regarding incident 1, the AJ found that neither discrimination nor

harassment was proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Regarding

incident 2, however, the AJ found that a preponderance of the evidence

demonstrated that the agency discriminated against complainant on the

basis of disability. The AJ awarded complainant compensatory damages and

reasonable costs, and ordered the agency to undertake various actions to

prevent future incidents of discrimination against complainant or others,

to include posting a notice about the finding of discrimination and

providing EEO training. On June 23, 2000, the agency issued a final

order fully implementing the AJ's decision.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration of

all statements submitted on appeal, the Commission AFFIRMS the agency

final order because the Administrative Judge's ultimate findings and

award of remedies are supported by the record.

Finally, although the record reflects that the agency has initiated

compliance with the AJ's order of remedies, to the extent that compliance

has not been completed, we instruct the agency to undertake the actions

set forth in the ORDER below.

ORDER

The agency shall insure that the chair provided to complainant as an

accommodation for his lumbar spine disorder remains in good working

order and to continue to accommodate complainant's inability to lift

over 25 pounds.

To the extent that it has not already done so, the agency shall pay

complainant all costs to which he may be entitled under Federal law in

connection with this complaint, as set forth in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501,

specifically to include copying of documents and travel reimbursement.

To the extent that it has not already done so, the agency shall pay

complainant compensatory damages as follows:

For the 95-days that the agency failed to provide complainant with

a �decent chair,� resulting in complainant's emotional distress and

physical pain, the agency shall pay complainant $25.00 per each day,

for a total of $2,375.00.

If it has not already done so, the agency shall conduct EEO training

for all responsible management officials identified by complainant in

his complaint, as well as for the staff in the Comptrollers Office and

the Civilian Personnel Office at Elmendorf Air Force Base, to insure

that they are aware of their obligations, responsibilities, and rights

under the EEOC's regulations and EEO law, including the right to work

in an environment free from disability discrimination and to use the EEO

system to remedy perceived violations of EEO laws. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.203

mandates that Federal agencies must be model employers for complying

with disability laws.

The agency shall take no retaliatory action against complainant for filing

this discrimination complaint, and the agency shall insure that in the

future complainant and all other disabled applicants and employees at

Elmendorf Air Force Base are not subjected to the same, similar, or any

acts of disability discrimination.

If it has not already posted a similar notice in a similar manner,

the agency shall post at all facilities within the authority of the

Comptroller's Office and the Civilian Personnel Office, a copy of the

attached notice. The notice should be signed by a duly authorized agency

representative and should be posted immediately upon the agency's receipt

of this decision. The notice should be maintained for a period of at

least 90 days in conspicuous places where the agency customarily posts

notices and it expects its employees and applicants for employment

to see. The agency should take all reasonable steps to insure that

the notices are not altered, defaced or covered by any other material.

The notices should advise employees and applicants of their rights to

be free of employment discrimination and their EEO remedies.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 23, 2002

__________________

Date