Ex Parte Klausner et alDownload PDFPatent Trials and Appeals BoardMar 22, 201914234752 - (D) (P.T.A.B. Mar. 22, 2019) Copy Citation UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE 14/234,752 04/24/2014 10800 7590 03/22/2019 Maginot, Moore & Beck LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 2200 Indianapolis, IN 46204 FIRST NAMED INVENTOR Markus Klausner UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www .uspto.gov ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 2178-0792 1044 EXAMINER CANTELMO, GREGG ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 1725 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 03/22/2019 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte MARKUS KLAUSNER, VOLKMAR DENNER, and STEFAN BUTZMANN Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 Technology Center 1700 Before LINDA M. GAUDETTE, N. WHITNEY WILSON, and JANEE. INGLESE, Administrative Patent Judges. INGLESE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants 1 request our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) of the Examiner's decision to finally reject claims 1, 3, 5-7, 9, and 10. 2 We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We REVERSE. 1 Appellants identify Robert Bosch GmbH and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. as the real parties in interest. Appeal Brief filed December 12, 2016 ("App. Br."), 3. 2 Final Office Action entered April 13, 2016 ("Final Act."). Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants claim an energy storage device for generating a supply voltage (independent claim 1 ), a power supply system (independent claim 6), and a method for operating an energy storage device (independent claim 7). App. Br. 5-11. Independent claims 1 and 7 illustrate the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below with contested language italicized: 1. An energy storage device for generating a supply voltage, compnsmg: an output connector; a plurality of parallel connected energy supply strings that are connected in each case to the output connector, each energy supply string of the plurality of energy supply strings including: a first string comprising a first plurality of energy storage modules connected in series and a first plurality of coupling modules, each energy storage module in the first plurality of energy storage modules including at least one energy cell and each coupling module including at least one switching device configured to connect a corresponding energy storage module in the first plurality of energy storage modules in series with the first string in a first mode and bridge the corresponding energy storage module to isolate the corresponding energy storage module from the first string in a second mode; a second string connected in parallel with the first string, the second string comprising a second plurality of energy storage modules connected in series and a second plurality of coupling modules, each energy storage module in the second plurality of energy storage modules including at least one energy cell and each coupling module including at least one switching device configured to connect a corresponding energy storage module in the second plurality of energy storage modules in series with the second string in the first mode and bridge the corresponding energy storage module to isolate the corresponding energy storage module from the second string in the second mode; and 2 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 a control device connected to the first plurality of coupling modules in the first string and the second plurality of coupling modules in the second string, the control device being configured to: identify an age of each energy storage module in the first plurality of energy storage modules and the second plurality of storage modules with reference to an operating temperature, a progression with respect to time of a power output, a progression with respect to time of an energy output, a service life without energy consumption, and a cumulative operating time of each energy storage module; operate the first plurality of coupling modules in the first string to connect a first predetermined number of the first plurality of energy storage modules in the first string in series to generate an output at a first voltage level and disconnect a second predetermined number of the first plurality of the energy storage modules in the first string, the first predetermined number of the first plurality of energy storage modules having identified ages that are less than any identified age in the second predetermined number of the first plurality of energy storage modules; and operate the second plurality of coupling modules in the second string to connect the first predetermined number of the second plurality of energy storage modules in the second string in series to generate another output at the first voltage level and disconnect the second predetermined number of the second plurality of the energy storage modules in the second string, the first predetermined number of the second plurality of energy storage modules having identified ages that are less than any identified age in the second predetermined number of the second plurality of energy storage modules. 7. A method for operating an energy storage device compnsmg: identifying with a control device a predetermined number of energy storage modules in each of a first string and a second 3 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 string of energy storage modules required to drive a load connected to the energy storage device with reference to a prevailing load requirement for the load, the first string comprising a first plurality of the energy storage modules connected in series and the second string comprising a second plurality of the energy storage modules connected in series, the first string and the second string being connected in parallel; identifying with the control device an age of each energy storage module in the first plurality of energy storage modules in the first string and an age of each energy storage module in the second plurality of energy storage modules in the second string with reference to an operating temperature, a progression with respect to time of a power output, a progression with respect to time of an energy output, a service life without energy consumption, and a cumulative operating time of each energy storage module; operating, with the control device, a first plurality of coupling devices in the first string in a first mode to connect the predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string to the load and a second plurality of coupling devices in the first string in a second mode to bypass any energy storage module in the first plurality of energy storage modules that is not in the predetermined number of energy storage modules, each energy storage module in the predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string having an age that is less than an age of any of the first plurality of energy storage modules that is not in the predetermined number of energy storage modules; and operating with the control device a first plurality of coupling devices in the second string in the first mode to connect the predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string to the load and a second plurality of coupling devices in the second string in the second mode to bypass any energy storage module in the second plurality of energy storage modules that is not in the predetermined number of energy storage modules, each energy storage module in the predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string having an age that is less than an age of any of the second 4 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 plurality of energy storage modules that is not in the predetermined number of energy storage modules. Response to Notice of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief filed January 25, 2017, 2--4, 8-10 (Claims Appendix) (emphasis added). Independent claim 6 includes the limitations of claim 1 italicized above. The Examiner maintains the following rejections in the Examiner's Answer entered November 28, 2017 ("Ans."): I. Claims 1, 5, and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § I02(b) as anticipated by Kawakami; 3 II. Claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) as unpatentable over Kawakami in view of Muto4 and either Andrieu5 or Koster; 6 III. Claims 1, 37, 5, and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) as unpatentable over Kawakami in view of Muto and either Andrieu or Koster; and IV. Claims 7, 9, and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) as unpatentable over Kawakami in view of Muto and either Andrieu or Koster. DISCUSSION Upon consideration of the evidence relied upon in this appeal and each of Appellants' contentions, we reverse the Examiner's rejection of 1, 5, and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § I02(b), and rejections of claims 1, 3, 5-7, 9, and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a), for the reasons set forth in the Appeal Brief and below. 3 Kawakami (US 5,744,936, issued April 28, 1998). 4 Muto (WO 2010/116671 Al, issued October 14, 2010). 5 Andrieu (5,543,245 issued August 6, 1996). 6 Koster (US 2005/0007074 Al, published January 13, 2005). 7 The Examiner includes claim 3 in Rejection II and III. Final Act. 7-12. 5 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 Rejection I Independent claims 1 and 6 both require the recited energy storage device and power supply system to comprise, in part, a control device configured to operate a first plurality of coupling modules in a first string to connect a first predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string and disconnect a second predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string, and operate a second plurality of coupling modules in a second string to connect the first predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string and disconnect the second predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string. The Examiner finds that Kawakami discloses an energy storage device having all the structural features recited in claims 1 and 6. Ans. 15- 18, 20, 24--25. The Examiner finds that Kawakami's energy storage device, therefore, "possesses the necessary structure to function as claimed." Ans. 24--25. More specifically, the Examiner finds that: Kawakami teaches [] an energy storage device that has the same energy supply strings, plural energy storage modules in each supply string and an array of controllable switches which can connect each string and each module in each string in response to measured operational parameters of each cell which indicates the service life ( or age) of each cell in the device. The energy storage device of Kawakami is therefore held to include a control device and structure which is sufficiently configured to perform the same functionality as it has all the necessary components therein to do so. Ans. 20. The Examiner finds that because "there is no clear evidence of record that the structure rather than the function of the claimed invention is different and patentably distinct compared to the structure of Kawakami," and because "the claims are directed to the device and therefore patentability 6 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 is given to the structure of the device rather than the functionality," Kawakami' s device anticipates the energy storage device of claims 1 and 6. Ans. 18, 21-23. The Examiner, however, does not provide a sufficient factual basis to support the Examiner's finding of anticipation, for reasons expressed by Appellants and discussed below. Although claims directed to an apparatus must be distinguished from the applied prior art in terms of structure rather than function, to satisfy the functional limitations in an apparatus claim, the Examiner has the burden of showing that the apparatus taught or suggested by the applied prior art is capable of performing the claimed function. In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477-78 (Fed. Cir. 1997). When the functional language is associated with programming or some other structure required to perform the function, that programming or structure must be present in order to meet the claim limitation. Typhoon Touch Techs., Inc. v. Dell, Inc., 659 F.3d 1376, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2011). As such, the prior art structure must be capable of performing the recited function without further programming. Id. ( emphasis added). Kawakami discloses an electric power accumulating apparatus that includes a string of serially-connected secondary batteries (referred to as "unit batteries") connected in parallel to additional parallel strings of serially-connected secondary batteries, and switching elements connected to each unit battery. Col. 4, 1. 62---col. 5, 1. 2; Figs. 3A and 3B. Kawakami discloses a control circuit connected to sensors, voltage detecting circuits, and current detecting circuits that are connected across each unit battery. Col. 5, 11. 26-36; Fig. 4. Kawakami discloses that the sensors detect 7 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 abnormalities in temperature or strain in the unit batteries, while the voltage and current detecting circuits detect abnormalities in voltage and current, respectively, in the batteries. Col. 5, 11. 41--46. Kawakami discloses that when a battery shows such an abnormality, the control circuit activates the appropriate switching element to detach the battery, and after replacement of the abnormal battery "with a new proper battery, the control circuit activates the switching element to connect the new battery to the system." Col. 5, 11. 46-54. Thus, Kawakami discloses that the control circuit activates a switching element to detach a unit battery that exhibits an abnormality. As Appellants correctly argue, the Examiner does not identify any disclosure in Kawakami that indicates that Kawakami' s control circuit is configured- without further programming-to connect a first predetermined number, and disconnect and second predetermined number, of energy storage modules in a first string, and connect and disconnect the same respective numbers of energy storage modules in a second string of Kawakami' s electric power accumulating apparatus, as required by claims 1 and 6. App. Br. 17-19; Reply Br. 3, 5---6. Although the Examiner asserts that Appellants' argument that Kawakami' s control circuit lacks the necessary programming to perform the functions recited in claims 1 and 6 "has no explicit bearing on the claimed invention as the claims do not include any explicit recitation of the control device being programmed" (Ans. 25), claims 1 and 6 recite that the control device is "configured to" perform the functions recited in the claims. Accordingly, the control device must possess the necessary programming to be "configured" to perform the recited functions. 8 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 On this appeal record, therefore, the Examiner does not provide a sufficient factual basis to establish that Kawakami' s control circuit is capable of operating a first plurality of coupling modules in a first string to connect a first predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string, and disconnect a second predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string; and operating a second plurality of coupling modules in a second string to connect the first predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string and disconnect the second predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string, as required by claims 1 and 6. Consequently, the Examiner fails to establish that Kawakami's control circuit, without further programming or structural modification, is capable of performing the functions recited in claims 1 and 6, as Appellants correctly argue. We accordingly do not sustain the Examiner's rejection of claims 1 and 6, and also claim 5, which depends from claim 1, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Kawakami. Rejections II-IV Similar to claims 1 and 6, independent claim 7 requires the recited method of operating an energy storage device to comprise, in part, operating with a control device a first plurality of coupling devices in a first string in a first mode to connect a predetermined number of energy storage modules in the first string, and a second plurality of coupling devices in the first string in a second mode to bypass any energy storage module in the first plurality of energy storage modules that is not in a predetermined number of energy storage modules; and operating with the control device a first plurality of coupling devices in a second string in a first mode to connect the 9 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 predetermined number of energy storage modules in the second string, and a second plurality of coupling devices in the second string in a second mode to bypass any energy storage module in the second plurality of energy storage modules that is not in the predetermined number of energy storage modules. The Examiner does not identify any disclosure in Kawakami that indicates or would have suggested that Kawakami' s control circuit is capable of operating-without further programming-to connect a first predetermined number of energy storage modules, and bypass any energy storage module that is not in a predetermined number of energy storage modules, in a first string, and connect and bypass the same respective numbers of energy storage modules in a second string of Kawakami' s electric power accumulating apparatus, as required by claim 7. Final Act. 12-15; Typhoon Touch, 659 F.3d at 1380. The Examiner also does not identify any disclosure in Kawakami that indicates or would have suggested that Kawakami's control circuit is capable of performing the functions recited in claims 1 and 6, without further programming ( discussed above). Because the Examiner does not rely on any disclosure in the secondary references that remedies these deficiencies of Kawakami (Final Act. 7-8, 11-12, 14--15; Ans. 27-30), we do not sustain the Examiner's rejections of independent claims 1, 6, and 7, and also claims 3, 5, 9, and 10, which each depend from claim 1 or 7, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). 10 Appeal2018-002979 Application 14/234,752 DECISION We reverse the Examiner's rejection of 1, 5, and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), and rejections of claims 1, 3, 5-7, 9, and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). REVERSED 11 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation