Dunn Sulphite Paper Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 30, 194242 N.L.R.B. 1104 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of DUNN SULPHITE PAPER COMPANY and UNITED PAPER, NOVELTY AND Toy WORKERS , INTERNATIONAL UNION, C I O. Case No. R-3993 -Decided July 30,1941 Jurisdiction : paper manufacturing industry Investigation and Certification of Representatives existence of question re- fusal to accord petitioner recognition, contract entered into after Company had notice of petitioning union's claim to representation, held no bar, elec- tions necessary Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining separate elections directed among paper and pulp workers, respectively, to determine whether they should con- stitute a single or separate units-single management, and prior history of collective bargaining in plant and tiaditional oiganization of woikeis in paper industry considered Mr. George C. Dunn, of Port Huron, Mich, for the Company Mr. Harry Sayre, of Monroe, Mich, for the Novelty Workeis Mr Archie Hook, of Monroe, Mich., for the Paper Makers. Mr. H. S Sullivan, of Worcester, Mass, for the Pulp Woikers Mr. A. Sumner Lawrence, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petition duly filed by United Paper, Novelty and Toy Work- ers, International Union, C I. 0., herein called the Novelty Workers, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Dunn Sulphite Paper Company, Port Huron, Michigan, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before E G Smith, Trial Examiner Said hearing was held at Port Huron, Michigan, on June 25, 1942 The Company, the Novelty Workers, International Brotherhood of Paper Makers, Blue Water Local No 399, herein called the Paper Makers, and International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite & Paper Mill Workers, Local No 387, herein called the Pulp Workers, appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine 42 N L R B , N 198 1104 DUNN SULPHITE PAPER COMPANY 1105 witnesses and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial, error and are hereby affirmed Upon the entire record in the case; the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACTS I THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Dunn Sulphite Paper Company is a Michigan corporation with its office and a plant, which alone is involved in this proceeding, located at Port Huion, Michigan. The Company is engaged in the manufacture of paper During the year ending December 31, 1941, the Company purchased raw matei ials amounting to more than $750,000 in value, of which 94 peicent was purchased outside the State of Michigan Dui ing the same peiiod, the Company's total sales amounted to moi e than $1,500,000, of which 97 percent was sold outside the State of Michigan It THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED United Paper, Novelty and Toy Workeis Inteinational Union, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congiess of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company. International Brotherhood of Paper Makers, Blue Water Local No 399, and International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite & Paper Mill Workers, Local No 387, are labor organizations affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to- membership employees of the Company. III THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On or about Maich 30, 1942, and subsequently on April 11, 26, 27, and May 1, 1942, the Novelty Workeis requested sole bargaining iights in the, Company's Port Huron plant but the Company refused to recognize the petitioning union or any other union as sole and exclusive representative until certified by the Board. At the hearing, the Paper Makers and the Pulp Workers contended that they had a contract with the Company which was a bar to the present proceeding It appears, however, that the contract in question is an oral agreement which had been reached on April 25, 1942, but had not been incorporated into a signed written agreement due to the fact that the Company was advised by the Novelty Workers on April '26, 1942, that it would be committing an unfair labor ni actice if it signed the agreement 427814-42-voL 2-70 1106 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Inasmuch as the contract in question was entered into with knowledge of a claim on the part of the Novelty Workers to represent the Company's employees, the conch act is not a bar to a present determination of representatives 1 From the statement of the Regional Director 2 and from certain written authorizations' of employees Introduced in evidence at the hearing, it appears that, the Novelty Workers, the Paper Makers, and the Pulp Woi kers each represents a substantial number of employees in the unit alleged by each to be appropriate We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT, THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTA1IVES The Novelty Workers originally claimed in the petition as filed that the appropriate unit should consist of all production and maintenance employees of the Company, excluding office, clerical, and supervisory employees° At the hearing, the Novelty Workers `amended the-peti- tion to state that the appropriate unit should consist of all production and maintenance employees including watchmen, janitors, service employees, and laboratory assistants, and should specifically exclude clerical and office employees and supervisory employees having the right to hire and discharge or having the right to recommend such action This proposed unit includes all employees of the Company other than those specifically excluded The Paper Makers and the Pulp Workers contend that there should be two separate units corresponding to the units coveied by past collective bargaining contracts which these unions have had with the Company and which correspond to their respective jurisdictions in the paper making industry The unit desired by the Paper Makers 1 See Matter of Inteilale Don Corporation and Local Union 1657 , Steel Workers Organizing Committee, C I 0, 38 N L R B 139 2 The Regional Director reported that the petitioner had submitted 68 signed mem- bership cards in the U A \V -C I 0 , and 69 signed membership caicls in the Novelty Workers , that an examination of both sets of cards showed that in 57 cases the same employee had signed both tapes of cards, th'tt of the 'U A W -C I 0 cards, 25 were dated March 1942, 1 in April 1942,' and 31 undated, that of the NoNelty workers cards, 1 was dated in Januaiy 1942 1 in March 1942, iS in April 1942 14 in M'iy 1942 and 3 undated, that among the signatures which appear to be genuine original signatures on both types of c'uds sic the names of 52 persons wliose names are on the Comp'1113 s pay loll of May 20 1942, and that these aie 109 employees in' the unit alleged by the Novelty workers to be appropriate The Regional Diiector fuithei iepoited that the Paper Makers and the Pulp workers claimed an inteiest in the proceeding due to the fact that they have had contractual relations with the Company continuously since 1934 and aie piesently opei'ttiiig undei a conti ict with the Company 3The Paper Mikeis and the Pulp workers intioduced in evidence 34 wntten statements of employees dated on of about April 30, 1942, to the effect that tlie3 authorized these organizations to represent them for the puiposes of collective bargai n ing DUNN SULPHITE PAPER COMPANY 1107 comprises the beater department, the paper machine department, the finishing department, and the shipping department, with a total of approximately 42 employees The unit desired by the Pulp Workers comprises the bleaching department, power department, repairs, main- tenance and constitlction depaitment, mill oiling department, stoies and receiving department, yard department, and salvage man, with a total of approximately 52 employees While the Company's employees are all directed by the same man- agement, the Company's mill, like other units in the industry, is di- vided into two more or less distinct operations. One consists of bleach- ing and washing raw mates ial until it is in condition to be made into paper. The other operation consists of the paper making process proper, and finishing and shipping the completed products Tra-, ditionally the organization of workers in paper mills has followed these distinct divisions and the jurisdiction of the Paper Makers and the Pulp Workers follow these lines,' and these unions have divided the employees in similar fashion in a seises of contracts with the Company prior to 1942 In view of the history of collective bargaining between the Company, here involved and its employees, we are of opinion and find that the employees in the two groups recognized as separate by the said con- tracts, may properly constitute two separate units appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining Accordingly we shall direct two separate elections, as follows (a) among the Company's employees in the beater department, the paper machine department, the finishing de- paitment, and the shipping department, excluding office, clerical, and supervisory employees, to determine whether they desire to be repre- sented by the Novelty Workers, the Paper Makers, or neither; and (b) among the Company's employees m the bleaching department, power department, repairs, construction and maintenance department, mill oiling department, stores and receiving department, yard department, and salvage man, excluding office, clerical, and supervisory employees, to determine whether they desire to be represented by the Novelty Workers, the Pulp Workers, or neither. Upon the results of these elections will depend in part the determina- tion of the appropriate unit or units If the employees in both groups select the same i epresentative, they will together constitute a single appropi iate unit; if they select difFei ent representatives they will constitute sepaiate units Inasmuch as the watchmen, janitors, service employees, and labora- tory assistants have not participated in the collective bargaining agree- s See Matter of Mosinee Paper Mills Company and International B, othem hood of Paper Makers and International Brothe,hood of Pulp, Sulphate and Paper Mill Wo,hers, I N L R B 393 1108 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR, RELATIONS BOARD ments with the Company in the past, we find that they have not a coin- munity of interest with the employees in the foregoing groups and shall therefore exclude them from the appropriate unit or units We shall, accordingly, direct that the question concerning repre- sentation which has arisen be resolved by separate elections by secret ballot among the employees in the foregoing groups who were em- ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elections, herein, subject to the ,limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Dunn Sulphite Paper Company, Port Huron, Michigan, separate elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Seventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among those employees of the Company at its Port Huron, Michigan, plant, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, in the groups described in Section, IV above, respectively, including any such employees who did riot work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine as to group (a) whether they desire to be represented by United Paper, Novelty and Toy Workers, International Union, C. I. 0., or by International Brotherhood of Paper Makers, Blue Water Local No 399, A. F. of L., for purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither ; and as to group (b) whether they desire to be represented by United Paper, Novelty and Toy Workers, International Union, C. I O , or by International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite & Paper 112i11 Workers, Local No 387, A F of L , for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither MR GERARD D REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation