Douglas H. Stup, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 4, 1999
01983151 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 4, 1999)

01983151

03-04-1999

Douglas H. Stup, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Douglas H. Stup v. United States Postal Service

01983151

March 4, 1999

Douglas H. Stup, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01983151

) Agency No. 1-K-221-0017-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's January 23, 1998 decision

dismissing appellant's complaint on the basis of failure to state a

claim under the provisions of 29 C.F.R.�1614.107(a) was proper.

The record shows that appellant alleged that he had been discriminated

against on the bases of race (White), color (white), sex (male), age (46)

and reprisal for prior EEO activity when: (1) on September 10, 1997,

a supervisor yelled at him to move mail faster and to stop talking and

just case mail; and, (2) on October 1, 1997, the same supervisor told

him to case the mail faster and to stop talking and just case mail.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint on the grounds

of failure to state a claim. On appeal, appellant states that during both

incidents the supervisor ordered him to stop talking and case mail, but

failed to do the same with the employees that were talking to appellant:

a black male and a female.

A review of the record persuades the Commission that the agency properly

dismissed appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim. The only

questions for the agency to consider are whether appellant is aggrieved

and the complaint alleges employment discrimination on a basis covered by

EEO statutes. If the answers are yes, then the agency must accept the

complaint for processing, regardless of what it thought of the merits.

Odoski v. U.S. Department of Energy, EEOC Appeal No. 01901496 (April 16,

1990). In his complaint appellant claims that he, a 46 year old white

male employee, with prior EEO activity, was ordered to stop talking

and case mail faster. We find that appellant has not shown how he

was aggrieved by being instructed to perform job duties. Accordingly,

the dismissal was proper and the final decision is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Mar 4, 1999

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations