Dallas Power & Light Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 31, 194457 N.L.R.B. 791 (N.L.R.B. 1944) Copy Citation In the Matter of DALLAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL B -69, AFL Case No. 16-R-951.-Decided July 31, 1944 Messrs . Floyd McGowan, W. Autry Norton, W. G. Moore, and H. R. Pearson , all of Dallas , Tex., for the Company. Mr. V. J. Cox, of Dallas, Tex., for the Union. Mr. David V. Easton, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by International Brotherhood of Elec- trical Workers, Local B-69, AFL, herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Dallas Power & -Light- Company, Dallas, Texas, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for' an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Robert F. Proctor, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Dallas, Texas, on- June '10,,1944. - The Company and the .Union appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard; to ex- amine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing' on the issues. At the hearing the Company moved, in effect, to dis- miss the petition on the ground that no question concerning repre- sentation had arisen. The Trial Examiner referred this motion to the0Board. We are of the opinion that a question concerning repre- sentation has arisen by reason of the fact that, as hereinafter found, the Company refuses to recognize the Union as the collective bargain- ing representative of its employees in the absence of certification -by the Board. The motion is accordingly denied. The Trial Exam- iner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. The Company's request for oral argument is denied. Subsequent to the hearing, the Union filed a, letter with 57 N. L. R. B., No. 132. N 791 1 / 792 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the Board which is in substance a motion to amend the petition by eliminating Garage Division employees from the proposed unit. Since the Company has indicated that it does not oppose the proposed amendment, the motion is hereby granted. Upon the'entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Dallas Power & Light Company, a Texas, corporation, is engaged in the' County of Dallas, Texas, in the generation and distribution of electric -power and energy. During the past year, the Company dis= tributed approximately 300 million kilowatt hours of electrical energy to various customers in the County of Dallas, among which were in- cluded airlines,-railways; motor freight companies, bus companies, telephone companies, telegraph, companies,' and newspapers. The revenue from these operations amounted to approximately $8,500,000. During the same year, the,Company purchased supplies and parts ,for use in its operations valued in excess of $50,000, a substantial portion- of which,. was purchased outside the State of Texas. The Company does not dispute the jurisdiction of the Board in, this proceeding. ' We find that the Company is engaged-in commerce' within the mean- ing of -the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION , INVOLVED International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local B- 69, is a labor organization affiliated with the/=American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. in. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company refuses to-grant recognition" to the Union as exclusive bargaining representative of certain of its employees until the Union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Field Examiner of the Board, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that the Union represents a sub- stantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appro- priate We find that a question-affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees within the meaning of Section 9 (C) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 1 The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 45 designations and that there were approximately 120 employees in the proposed unit. DALLAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 793 W. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union seeks to represent a unit comprised- of all employees in the Company's overhead construction division, underground construe- tion division,, meter division, and trouble division, including senior clerks of the trouble'division, but excluding all stenographers,- chief clerks, senior clerks of all divisions except the trouble division, 'super- visors. and foremen above the grade of gang foremen, and all other employees of the Company. The Company agrees that the foregoing constitutes an appropriate unit, but contends that foremen-line (super- visory) Class A-1 and A, foremen-operating-pole setting, and fore- men-operating-transformer' repair, are supervisory employees and should be excluded from the unit. N The record indicates that supervisory line foremen, Class A-1 and A, are salaried employees who have authority to make recommenda- tions affecting promotions and discharges of employees under their supervision, and can, take disciplinary action with respect to them. We'are of the opinion that these employees fall within our customary definition of supervisory employees and we shall exclude them, The operating foremen, both pole setting and transformer repair, supervise small groups of employees, but have the authority to make recommendations which affect the working status of such employees. They report directly to the heads of their respective divisions. We are of the opinion that they, too, -are supervisory employees, and we shall exclude them. We find that all employees in the-,Company's overhead.construction, division, underground construction division, meter division, and trouble division, including senior clerks of the trouble division, but, excluding stenographers, chief clerks, senior clerks of all divisions, except the trouble division, foremen-line (supervisory)' Class A-1 and A, foremen-operating-pole setting, foremen-operating-transformer repair, all other supervisory employees with authority, to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or, otherwise effect changes in, the status of em- ployees, or effectively recommend such action, and all other employees of the Company, constitute a ,unit appropriate for the purposes, of col- lective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9"(b I ) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot. The Com- pany contends that the Board should make provision for voting in any such election by employees of the Company who are now in the armed forces-of the United States. We have carefully considered the contention of the Company as urged by it both in the record and in its 794 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR REIsATIONS BOARD brief, and we are of the opinion that; as state'd-in Mattei of Mine Safety Appliances Co., 55 N. L. R. B. 1190, it is administratively impracticable to provide for the balloting by mail of employees in the armed. forces who are unable; to, appear, at the,polls. ,. Accordingly, only ,those em- ployees in the armed ' forces of the United States who present them- selves in person at,the polls will be permitted to vote. We shall direct that the employees of the Company eligible. to vote in the election shall be those in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election, herein, subject to the liinitatio-ns and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested Iii the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations'Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9,*of National Labor Relations Board Rules' and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for 'the' purposes of collective bargaining with Dallas Power & ,Light Company, Dallas, Texas, an election by secret ballot shall be,con= ducted as • early' as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from • the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Sixteenth Region, acting iii'this natter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among, the -employee's in'the unit found appropriate in Section IV,'above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately 'preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on-vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but'eicluding those employees' who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local B-69, AFL', for the purposes of collective bargaining. CHAIRMAN MILLIs took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. . - 1 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation