Cynthia U. Anderson, Complainant,v.Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 13, 2002
01A21831_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 13, 2002)

01A21831_r

08-13-2002

Cynthia U. Anderson, Complainant, v. Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Cynthia U. Anderson v. Department of the Air Force

01A21831

August 13, 2002

.

Cynthia U. Anderson,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. James G. Roche,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A21831

Agency No. ED1M96036

Hearing No. 150-A1-8201X

DECISION

Complainant initiated an appeal from the agency's final order concerning

her equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

The record reveals that complainant, a Recreation Assistant at the

agency's Hurlburt Field Youth Center facility, filed a formal EEO

complaint on January 17, 1997, alleging that the agency had discriminated

against her on the basis of race when:

Complainant received an overall rating of "fully successful" on her

performance appraisal for the rating period July 1, 1996 - June 30, 1996.

Complainant was detailed to a position in the Open Recreation Program

at the Child Care Center on September 30, 1996.

At the conclusion of the investigation, complainant received a copy

of the investigative report and requested a hearing before an EEOC

Administrative Judge (AJ). By order issued October 19, 2001, the AJ

dismissed complainant's complaint from the hearing process when neither

complainant nor her representative appeared for a pre-hearing telephone

conference scheduled for October 16, 2001. The AJ's order remanded

the complaint to the agency for a decision. The Commission finds that

the AJ's order was appropriate.

In a final decision dated April 8, 2002, the agency concluded that

complainant failed to present evidence that more likely than not,

the agency's articulated reasons for its actions were a pretext for

discrimination.

The Commission finds that complainant failed to show by a preponderance

of evidence that the agency's articulated reasons for its actions were

a pretext or intended to mask discriminatory animus. In reaching this

conclusion, we note that complainant failed to rebut the testimony of

her former supervisor regarding the critical and non-critical elements

of her performance appraisal and overall rating. Similarly, complainant

has submitted no evidence to show the agency's decision to transfer her

position to one in the Child Care Center was motivated by discrimination

and not a legitimate business decision to reassign complainant to a

position consistent with her educational qualifications and experience.

Therefore, after a careful review of the record, including complainant's

contentions on appeal, the agency's response, and arguments and evidence

not specifically addressed in this decision, we AFFIRM the agency's

decision finding no discrimination.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 13, 2002

__________________

Date