Columbia Welding Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 21, 194352 N.L.R.B. 771 (N.L.R.B. 1943) Copy Citation In the Matter of LEO ROBITAILLE, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME: AND STYLE OF- COLUMBIA WELDING COMPANY and UNITED BROTHER- HOOD OF WELDERS, CUTTERS AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL # 22 Case No. R-5896.-Decided September 01, 1943 Mr. Samuel Kuperschmid, of New York City, and Messrs. Bert R. Joel and Frank Hellings of Brooklyn, N. Y., for the Company. Mr. Henry Mayer by Mr. Howard Feinberg, of New York City, and Mr. S. T. Gordon, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Mr. Leo Fischer, of Elmhurst, L. I., for the Union. Miss Olive N. Barton, of Counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon an amended petition duly filed by United Brotherhood of Welders, Cutters and Helpers of America, Local $k 22, unaffiliated, herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Leo Robi- taille, doing business under the name and style of Columbia Welding Company, Brooklyn, New York, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hear- ing upon due notice before Martin I. Rose, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at New York City on August 20 and 23, 1943. The Company and the Union appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Exam- iner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Opportunity was afforded all parties to. file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Leo Robitaille, doing business under the name and style of Columbia. Welding Company, is a sole proprietor having his principal office anct 52 N L. R B., No. 135. 549875-44-N of 52-50 771 772 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD place of business at Brooklyn, New York. The Company is engaged as a subcontractor in the business of, welding. The value of raw materials consisting principally of gasoline, oil, machines, and mis- cellaneous materials such as welding rods and cables purchased by the Company during the period from January 1 to June 30, 1943, amounted to $39,000, of which $28,000 in value was shipped to the Company from points outside of the State of New York. During the same period, the Company's business totaled $509,000, of which ap- proximately 90 percent was welding work performed either by way of construction or repair of warships or of vessels which carry freight between United States ports and ports of foreign countries. The welding was done under contracts with Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Todd Shipyards Corporation, and Federal Shipbuilding Corporation at their yards. The company is engaged 100 percent in war work. The Company concedes that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED United Brotherhood of Welders, Cutters and Helpers of America, Local #22 is an independent labor organization, admitting to mem- bership certain employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On or about April 14, 1943, the Union began repeated attempts to bargain with the Company, which refused to enter into any kind of agreement and failed to answer a registered letter requesting a bargaining conference. A statement of the Regional Director, introduced in evidence at the hearing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of employees within the unit herein found appropriate., 'The Regional Director reported that the Union submitted 67 authorization cards, 59 of which were dated between March 20 and April 30, 1943. The record shows that the Union also submitted to the Trial Examiner 25 authorization cards dated May and July and August 1943. The 67 cards were compared with 3 pay rolls of the Company dated April 29, May 12, and August 10, 1943, with the following results : Pay-roll date Number on Number of signatures which arepay roll names on pay roll April 29,1943 ---------------------------------------------------------- 153 59 May 12,1943 ---------------------------------------------------------- 218 43 August 10 , 1943 -------------------------------------------------------- 228 50 The 25 cards were checked against the August 10 pay roll only ; 21 of them bore apparently genuine original signatures of persons on that pay roll. These added to 29 signatures which the Regional Director found, made a total of 50. The special circum- stances making the consideration of the 25 additional cards necessary was the rapid turn-over of employees at the plant. COLUMBIA WELDING COMPANY 773 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT In substantial agreement with a stipulation of the parties, we find that all welders, cutters, and helpers of the Company, but excluding office employees, machinists, shop men who are not welders, cutters or helpers, fire watchers and all supervisory employees including snappers, general foremen, supervisors of higher supervisory capac- ity than general foremen, who have authority to hire, promote, dis- charge, discipline or otherwise effect changes in the status of em- ployees or effectively recommend such action, constitute • a unit ap- propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the mean- ing of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that a question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DmEcTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Leo Robitaille, doing business under the name and style of Columbia Welding Com- pany, Brooklyn, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be con- ducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preced- ing the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work 774 DEC'ISION'S OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Brotherhood of Welders, Cutters and Helpers of America, Local #22, for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation