Clinton W. Lebrecht, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 30, 2008
0120083532 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 30, 2008)

0120083532

10-30-2008

Clinton W. Lebrecht, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Clinton W. Lebrecht,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083532

Agency No. 4H327003308

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated July 10, 2008, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7)

for failure to provide relevant information. In his complaint,

complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis

of disability (knee) when his request for a mutual swap was denied.

The agency commenced an investigation on the complaint and, on April 11,

2008, sent complainant a request for an affidavit along with instructions

and forms for completing the affidavit. In its final decision, the

agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7)

for failure to cooperate, arguing that complainant failed to return the

requested affidavit despite a written warning in the affidavit packet

sent to him that failure to provide the affidavit could result in the

dismissal of her complaint.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7) provides for the dismissal

of a complaint where the agency has provided the complainant with a

written request to provide relevant information or otherwise proceed with

the complaint, and the complainant has failed to respond to the request

within fifteen days of its receipt, or the complainant's response does not

address the agency's request, provided that the request included a notice

of the proposed dismissal. The regulation further provides that, instead

of dismissing for failure to cooperate, the complaint may be adjudicated

if sufficient information for that purpose is available. Generally, the

Commission has held that an agency should not dismiss a complaint when it

has sufficient information upon which to base an adjudication. See Ross

v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05900693 (August 17,

1990); Brinson v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05900193

(April 12, 1990). It is only in cases where the complainant has engaged

in delay or contumacious conduct and the record is insufficient to permit

adjudication that the Commission as allowed a complaint to be dismissed

for failure to cooperate. See Card v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Request No. 05970095 (April 23, 1998); Kroeten v. United States

Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940451 (Dec. 22, 1994).

In the instant case, we find that, on April 15, 2008 complainant

requested an extension of time for filing his affidavit. Complainant

stated that there was an excessive work load because of the tax season

and that he was undergoing major surgery (knee replacement) on April 17,

2008 and would be out of work for at least seven weeks. In response

to complainant's request, he was told to send his extension request to

Tampa, Florida Complainant asserts he sent the information to Tampa, it

was delivered, and that he never heard back from the agency and assumed

that his request was granted. The agency did not submit any evidence of a

response. Thus, the Commission finds that there is insufficient evidence

to support a conclusion that complainant purposely engaged in delay or

contumacious conduct. Instead, we find that complainant made a very

timely request for an extension given that he was due to have surgery.

He believed that because he was not told otherwise, the extension had

been granted. As such, the agency should have granted him the extension

of time

Accordingly, we conclude that the agency should have granted complainant

additional time for submitting the affidavit, rather than dismissing

the complaint. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is reversed. The complaint is hereby remanded

to the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision

and the Order below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29

C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 30, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083532

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120083532