Charmayne M. Kirkland, Petitioner,v.Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 24, 2008
0320090005 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 24, 2008)

0320090005

12-24-2008

Charmayne M. Kirkland, Petitioner, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Charmayne M. Kirkland,

Petitioner,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320090005

MSPB No. DC0752080582I1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

Petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of an initial decision issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning her claim of discrimination in

violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation

Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

Petitioner alleged that she was discriminated against on the basis of

disability when she was assigned to the position of Management Program

Specialist, GS-0301-11 from her position of Industrial Hygienist,

GS-0690-13. Petitioner alleged her reassignment was an involuntary

demotion. Petitioner filed an EEO complaint on the matter, it was

investigated, and a decision was issued which petitioner appealed to

the Board. An MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ) issued an initial decision

finding that petitioner failed to make a nonfrivolous allegation that

her reduction in grade was involuntary. Thus, the AJ found that the

Board lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The AJ's decision did not

give petitioner appeal rights to the Commission. Petitioner then filed

the instant petition.

When the MSPB has denied jurisdiction in such matters, the Commission

has held that there is little point in continuing to view the matter

as a "mixed case" as defined by 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(a). Thus, the

case will be considered a "non-mixed" matter and processed accordingly.

See generally Schmitt v. Dept. of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. 01902126

(July 9, 1990); Phillips v. Dept. of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05900883

(October 12, 2990); 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(c)(2)(i) and (ii). In accordance

with these principles, Petition No. 0320090005 hereby is administratively

closed, and the matter is referred to the agency for further processing

as outlined below.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Petitioner is advised by operation of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(c)(2)(ii),

the agency is required to process her allegations of discrimination as a

"non-mixed" matter pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109 et seq. The agency

shall acknowledge to petitioner that it has received the remanded matter

within thirty (30) days of the date this decision becomes final.1 If

it has not already done so, the agency shall issue to the petitioner

a copy of the investigative file and also notify the petitioner of the

right to a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge within sixty (60)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If petitioner requests a final

decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within

sixty (60) days of receipt of petitioner's request. Petitioner shall have

the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court, based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board,

within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the decision is received.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, D.C. 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 24, 2008

__________________

Date

1 Petitioner's EEO complaint had 9 issues which were addressed in the

agency's decisions. All of the issues should be included in the processing

of the matter.

??

??

??

??

2

0320090005

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 77960

Washington, D.C. 20013

3

0320090005