Caterpillar Tractor Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 17, 194136 N.L.R.B. 1035 (N.L.R.B. 1941) Copy Citation In the Matter Of CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO. and FARM EQUIPMENT WORKERS .URGANI7.ING COMMITTEE, AFFILIATED WITH THE C. I. O. Case No. R-3192.-Decided November 17, 1941 Jurisdiction : tractor, road machinery, and Diesel engine manufacturing indus- try. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal of Company to grant union exclusive recognition ; election necessary. Unit' Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : hourly paid production and main- tenance employees, with certain inclusions and exclusions 11Ir. Ralph M. Illonle,' of East Peoria ; Ill., for ,the Company. Messrs. Meyers d Meyers, by Mr. Irving Meyers, of Chicago, Ill., for the F. E. W. O. C. Mr. Henry 4. McFarland, of Peoria , Ill., for the Federal Labor Union. Mr. ill. G. Coffman, of East Peoria, Ill., for the Independent. Mr. Roy E. Rogers, of'Hammond, Ind., for the Pattern Makers. MMJr. Eric B. Bjur man, of Peoria, Ill., for the I. A. M. Mr. Harry Cooper, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION . STATEMENT OF THE CASE On September 9. 1941, Farm Equipment Workers Organizing Committee, affiliated with the C. I. 0., herein called the F. E. W.' O. C., filed with the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region (Chicago, Illinois) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Caterpillar Tractor Co., Peoria, Illinois, herein called the Com- pany, and requesting an investigation and certification of representa- tives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. 'On October 1, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of -National Labor Relations Board-Rules and- Regulations-Series 2, as amended, or- 36 N L. R. B , No. 212. 1035 1036 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD dered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On October 2 and 7, 1941, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing and a notice of continuance of hearing, respectively, copies of both of which were duly served upon the Company and the F. E. W. O. C., and upon Independent Union of Tractor Workers, herein 'called the' Independent; and International Association of Ma- chinists, herein called the I. A. M., labor organizations claiming to represent employees directly affected by the investigation, and upon Pattern Makers League of North America, herein called the Patterii Makers, a labor organization representing employees of the Com- pany. On October,,7, 1941, the Regional Director also issued copies of the above notices which were duly served upon Federal Labor Union No. 22945, American Federation of Labor, herein called the Federal Labor Union, a labor organization claiming to represent employees directly affected by the investigation. On October 11, 1941, the Regional Director issued notice of further continuance of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the F. E. W. O. C., the Federal Labor Union, the Independent, the I. A. M., and the Pattern Makers. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on October 21, 1941, at Peoria, Illinois, before Isaiah S. Dorfman, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Company, the F. E. W. O. C., the Federal Labor Union, the Independent, the I. A. M., and the Pattern Makers were represented by counsel or duly authorized representatives and all except the Pattern Makers participated in the hearing.' Full opportunity to be heard, to exam- ine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hear- ing, the Trial Examiner made rulings on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed these rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. TIIE BUSINESS OF TIIE COMPANY The ,Company is a California corporation engaged in the manu- .facture, sale, and distribution of tractors, road machinery, and Diesel engines. The plant involved in this proceeding is located in Peoria, Illinois. From January through June 1941, the Company purchased I See footnote 3, infra. CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO. 1037 raw materials having an approximate value of $25,000,000. At least 50 per cent of such materials were transported to the Peoria plant from points outside the State of Illinois. During the same period, the Company sold products having an approximate sales value of $50 ,000,000. Approximately 90 per cent of such products were trans- ported from the, Peoria plant to points outside the State of Illinois. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Farm Equipment Workers Organizing Committee is a labor or- ganization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations. Federal Labor Union No. 22945, Pattern Makers League of North America, and International Association of Machinists are labor or- ganizations affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. Inde- pendent Union of Tractor Workers is a labor organization. Each of the foregoing labor organizations admits to membership employees of the Company. III. T LIE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On two occasions in April 1941, the F. E. W. O. C. requested of the Company recognition as exclusive representative of the Com- pany's production and maintenance employees. On each of these occasions, the Company refused to grant such recognition. A state- ment of the Regional Director introduced in evidence shows that the F. E. W.-O. C. represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be.appropriate.2 We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company.$ , 2 The Company's hourly pay roll for the period ending September 13, 1941, bears 13,100 names The F. E. W. 0 C submitted to the Regional `Director approximately 4,500 authorization cards. The Regional Director reported that the signatures on these cards were not checked against the pay roll since, as noted below, the F. E. W. O. C. has a membership contract with the Company. The other labor organizations submitted the following evidence of membership: The Federal Labor Union submitted to the Regional Director 480 authorization cards, 67 of which were undated and the remainder of which were dated between May and September 1941. Of the authorization cards submitted, 341 bore names listed on the Company's pay roll for the period ending September 13, 1941. In addition, the Federal Labor Union submitted 139 authorization cards for which there appeared to be no clock numbers. No check was made of these cards against the pay roll. Two of the 480 cards were unsigned. As noted below, the I A M has a membership contract with the Company. The Inde- pendent submitted to the Regional Director 151 undated application cards. Of these, 138 bore signatures which appeared to be the names of employees on the Company's pay roll, and 1 card was unsigned. 8 Since, as noted below, pattern makers and pattern makers' apprentices are by..stipu- lation excluded from the appropriate unit, and the Company recognizes the Pattern Makers as exclusive bargaining representative of pattern makers in its employ, no question concerning representation of pattern makers and pattern makers' apprentices is raised in this proceeding 1038 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL' LABOR RELATION'S BOARD IV. THE. EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of.the Company described in Section I, above,, has a' close, intimate, and substantial relation to-trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Company 's position is that the -determination of the appro- priate unit is for the Board. At the hearing the F. E. W. O. C., the Federal Labor Union, the Independent , and the I. A. M. stipulated, and we find ; that the following groups of employees should be in- cluded in the appropriate unit: hourly paid production and mainte- nance employees , lead men , apprentices other than pattern makers' apprentices, hourly paid factory clerical employees , timekeepers, all hourly paid employees in metallurgical department, testers employed in proving ground and plant proper , employees in material control department ( production office ), and janitors . It was further stipu- lated and • we find that the following groups of employees should be excluded from the unit : Supervisory employees , foremen, ' pattern makers and pattern makers ' apprentices , watchmen, office employees, and heating -department employees. The Federal Labor Union and the Independent - desire the inclusion in, and the F. E. W: O. C. desires the'exclusion from, the appropriate unit, of the following groups of employees : cafeteria employees ; tool designing department employees in, tractor and road i a-elli ie divisions '; planning department employees in tractor , foundry, and road machine divisions ; experimental machine 'shop employees ;' ekperi-, mental laboratory, employees; and engineering office employees.4- The Independent desires the inclusion in, and the F. E'. `WW. O'. C. the ex ' elusion from, he • appropriate unit, of salaried factory clerical employees. On June 3, 1941 , the Company and the F. E. W. O. C. entered into an agreement providing for recognition' of the F. E. W. O. C. "as the collective bargaining agent for members of the Union employed by the Company in Peoria , Illinois, on the hourly roll who are engaged in production and maintenance work." On July 27, 1941, the Coin- ' As to the third , fourth , and last groups enumerated, the independent's position is that only hourly paid employees in these groups should be included in the unit CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO. 1039 parry recognized the Pattern Makers as the exclusive bargaining rep- resentative of all pattern makers in the Company's employ in Peoria. On August 21, 1941, the Company and the I. A. M.,entered into an agreement providing for recognition of the I. A. M. as the representa- tive of its members employed by the Company in Peoria, Illinois, "on the hourly payroll." The testimony of the Company's Director of Industrial Relations indicates that the disputed groups of employees discussed below were not by name included in or excluded from the scope of the agreements with the F. E. W. O. C. or the I. A. M. The Director of Industrial Relations stated at the hearing that to his knowledge no hourly paid employees were excluded from the scope of these agreements. Salaried factory clerical, employees. There appears to be-one such employee at the present time, whose duty it is to- distribute and to "control" blue-prints. The Director of Industrial Relations testified that there was no real difference between his duties and those of hourly factory clerical employees, who are included in the unit by stipulation. The Director testified that he knew no reason why the one factory clerk was salaried, stating that this employee merely "happened"-to be so paid. According to the F. E. W. O. C. constitution, those admissible to membership in that organization include "clerical workers.", The bylaws of the Independent excludes from membership only persons having the right to hire or discharge. Under the circumstances, we shall include salaried factory clerical employees in the appropriate unit. The I. A. M. made no contentions at the hearing which were at variance with those of the Federal Labor Union. The I. A. M. indi- cated that its members would vote "in the American Federation of Labor column," and, so far as appears, does not dispute the Federal Labor Union's right to represent any of the employees in the appro- priate unit. Cafeteria employees. These employees are hourly paid, with the exception of a number who are clearly supervisory employees. Most of the cafeteria employees are girls who are classified as waitresses, counter clerks, salad clerks, cooks, or stand supervisors. The sole function of these employees is the preparation- and service-'of food. The base rate of pay of these employees is about 40 cents, whereas the starting rate among production employees is 70 cents. In addition to their hourly rate of pay, the cafeteria employees receive one or two meals. According to the testimony of the Director of Industrial Rela- tions,-.no union in bargaining with the Company has ever expressly claimed to represent, such 'employees. Since their function, working conditions, and interests are distinct from those of production and 1040 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD maintenance employees, we shall exclude the cafeteria employees from the unit.5 Engineering office. At the present time, there are only salaried em- ployees in the engineering office. Such employees are engineers and draftsmen. The engineers are required to have an engineering back- ground including college training or its equivalent. No union has ever sought to bargain for this group. Since they are salaried em- ployees who are not engaged in production or maintenance work and who are performing duties for which a high degree of skill and train- ing is required, we shall exclude the engineering office employees from the unit.e Tool designing department employees in tractor and road machine divisions. The two main classifications of employees in the tool de- signing department are tool and machine designers and detailers, both hourly paid groups of employees. Machine designers perform the work which their name implies, and require skill and a thorough knowledge of shop problems, machinery, and design. The detailers work out the details of the particular machine which is designed. The base rate of pay in the tool designing department is more than 70 cents per hour, the starting rate in the production departments. The tool designing department is located in a building which houses gen- eral factory offices, material control office, maintenance office, and engineering department. There is a close working relation between the tool designers and the tool makers. The superintendent of the tool room has an office in the same building as the tool designers and such office is adjacent to the space occupied by tool designers. A large number of tool designers are recruited from the Company's own shops. The Director of Industrial Relations testified that while the Company has dealt with a number of organizations as representatives of their members, he did not know in which departments such members were located and did not recall that any union ever claimed to represent tool designing department employees. Under all the circumstances, since they are not engaged in production or maintenance work, and in view of the skill and training required of them, we shall exclude the tool designing department employees from the appropriate unit.' Planning department employees, in tractor, foundry and road mna- chine divisions. These are all hourly paid employees, with the excep- tion of supervisors in the planning department. The planning depart- 5 See Matter of National Distillers Products Corporation and United Distillers Indus- trial Local Union No 758, C 1 0 , 28 N L. R B , No 172 9 See Matter of Union Swatch & Signal Company and United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, Local 610 , 30 N L R B, No 130 7 See Matter of Union Switch & Signal Company and, United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, Local 610, 30 N L. R B , No 130 ; Matter of Menasco Manufacturing Company and International Union of United Automobile Workers of America, Local 683, C I O,^28 N L R B, No 160 CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO 1041 ment's function consists of the study of problems relating to budding ;ay-outs, assembly lay-outs, or machine lay- outs. There is also some drafting work, and the employees work with blue-prints. These em- ployees receive rates of pay higher than the base rate of 70 cents for the production divisions. The classifications of employees in the plan- ning department are as follows : ( a) routing and tooling employees, who determine the routes material shall take through the factory, and which machines and operations are required, and whose work requires an extensive knowledge of shop problems and a great deal of mechanical training and background; (b) time-study employees, who engage in analyzing the work expectancy of machines or operations , and who are skilled employees requiring a machine-shop background and factory experience ; (c) lay-out employees , who also require a mechanical back- ground and a knowledge of factory problems; and (d) estimators, who estimate the probable costs of certain operations, and whose work is partly clerical and requires a knowledge of shop operations. Under all the circumstances, and in view of the training, experience, and skill required of these employees and the nature of their duties, we shall exclude planning department employees from the appropriate unit. Experimental laboratory employees. This is a small group of em- ployees engaged in the development of new engineering proces--es. The large majority of these employees are promoted to this department from other positions in the plant. The following classifications in this department are hourly paid employees : dynamometer operators, assem- blers, machinists, inspectors, follow-up men, stock chasers, and a mis- cellaneous group. There are also some salaried engineers in this depart- ment. The dynamometer operator reads an instrument which measures the efficiency of engines. His work is not particularly skilled. The ma- chinists in this department perform bench lay-out work, which requires more skill than the work of plant machinists . The assemblers and in- spectors in this department perform work similar to that engaged in by assemblers and inspectors in the plant proper except that the work of the assemblers and inspectors in the laboratory is not as routine. Assemblers in this department are good mechanics who are capable of working with newly designed pieces. Under all the circumstances, and in view of the nature of their work, we shall include hourly paid em- ployees in this department in the appropriate unit. However, the salaried engineers shall be excluded from the unit. Experimental machine shop. This shop has a small number of cln- ployees who are classified as experienced operators of lathes , grinders, milling machines, and drills. They are hourly paid employees having more experience than that of production employees. Their primary duty consists of production of experimental parts. They follow in- structions from blue--prints and receive instructions from the engineer- 433118-42-vol 36-67 1042 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ing department. They require extensive experience in the operations in which they are engaged. They receive a rate of pay higher than the base rate in the factory. Since, so far as appears, except as indicated above, the work of these employees does not differ from that of ma- chine operators in production departments, we shall include employees of the experimental machine shop in the unit. We find that the following employees of the Company at its Peoria, Illinois, plant : hourly paid production and maintenance employees, lead men, apprentices other than pattern makers' apprentices, hourly paid factory clerical employees, timekeepers, hourly paid employees in metallurgical department, testers employed in proving ground and plant proper, employees in material control department (produc- tion office), janitors, salaried factory clerical employees; hourly paid experimental laboratory employees (dynamometer operators, assem- blers, machinists, inspectors, follow-up men, stock chasers, and miscel- laneous employees), and experimental machine shop employees; ex- cluding supervisory employees, foremen, pattern makers and pattern makers' apprentices, watchmen, office employees, heating department employees, cafeteria employees, engineering office employees, tool de- signing department employees in tractor and road machine divisions, planning department employees in tractor, foundry and road machine division (routing and tooling employees, tine-study men, lay-out em- ployees, estimators), and salaried engineers in experimental labora- tory; constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bar- gaining, and that said unit will insure to employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise will effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot. As indi- cated above, the I. A. M. has expressed no desire to be designated on the ballot as the I. A. M., and its representative stated at the hearing that I. A. M. members would vote "in the American Federation of Labor column." The F. E. W. 0. C. desires to appear on the ballot- 'as "United Farm Equipment Workers of America, Local 105, affiliated with the C. I. 0." The Federal Labor Union desires to appear on the ballot as "American Federation of Labor, Local No. 22945." The F. E. W. 0. C. requests that eligibility to vote be determined by the pay roll immediately preceding the Direction of Election herein. The Federal Labor Union requests as the pay-roll date the last Friday preceding the date of the election. No reason appears for this latter request. We shall follow our usual practice and direct that the em- ployees of the Company eligible to vote in the election shall be those CATERPILLAR TRACTOR CO. 1043 In the appropriate unit employed during the pay-roll period immedi- ately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction.' Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Caterpillar Tractor Co., Peoria, Illinois, within, the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. The following employees of the Company at its Peoria, Illinois, plant: hourly paid production and maintenance employees, lead men, apprentices other than pattern makers' apprentices, hourly paid fac- tory clerical employees, timekeepers, hourly paid employees in metal- lurgical department, testers employed in proving ground and plant proper, employees in material control department (production office), janitors, salaried factory clerical employees, hourly paid experimental laboratory employees (dynamometer operators, assemblers, machin- ists, inspectors, follow-up men, stock chasers, and miscellaneous em- ployees), and experimental machine shop employees; excluding super- visory employees, foremen, pattern makers and pattern makers' ap- prentices, watchmen, office employees, heating department employees, cafeteria employees, engineering office employees, tool designing de- partment employees in tractor and road machine divisions, planning department employees in tractor, foundry and road machine divisions (routing and tooling employees, time-study men, lay-out employees, estimators), and salaried engineers in experimental laboratory; con- stitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Caterpillar Tractor Co., Peoria, Illinois, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty O The Federal Labor Union requests that the election be conducted on the premises of the Company The F E IN' 0 IC 's position is that an election away from the pl mt is ecsential to a free choice of representatives The time and place of the election shall be detemmned, in accordance with onr usual practice, by the Regional Director 1044 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (30) days from the date' of this Direction of Election, under the di- rection and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regula- tions, among the following employees of the Company at its Peoria, Illinois, plant : hourly paid production and maintenance employees, lead men, apprentices other than pattern makers ' apprentices , hourly paid factory clerical employees, timekeepers, hourly paid employees in metallurgical department, testers employed in proving ground and plant proper, employees in material control department (produc- tion office), janitors, salaried factory clerical employees, hourly paid experimental laboratory employees (dynamometer-operators, assem- blers, machinists, inspectors, follow-up men, stock chasers, and mis- cellaneous employees), and, experimental machine shop employees; who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Election, including those who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off; but excluding supervisory employees, 'foremen, pattern makers and pattern makers ' apprentices , watchmen, office em- ployees , heating department employees , cafeteria employees , engineer- ing office employees, tool designing department employees in tractor and road machine divisions , planning department employees in tractor, foundry and road machine division (routing and tooling employees, time-study men, lay-out employees, estimators), salaried engineers in experimental laboratory, and employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause; to determine whether they desire to be repre- sented by United Farm Equipment Workers of America, Local 105, affiliated with the C. I. 0., or by American Federation of Labor, Local No. 22945, or by Independent Union of Tractor Workers, for the pur- pose of collective bargaining, or by none of these organizations. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation