Bridgette Mention, Complainant,v.Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 15, 2012
0120121452 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 15, 2012)

0120121452

06-15-2012

Bridgette Mention, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Bridgette Mention,

Complainant,

v.

Ray Mabus,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120121452

Agency No. 116111504229

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated January 24, 2012, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Lead Customer Service Clerk at the Agency's Navy Exchange, Naval Submarine Base in New London, Connecticut.

On December 28, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American), sex (female), and color (Black) when on, September 2, 2011, she was terminated from her employment after she was charged with misusing store promotional coupons to give favors to another employee.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), stating it was moot. The Agency explained the Complainant's termination was withdrawn, she was give all back pay and benefits to which she was entitled, and she was offered her position back. However, Complainant had already relocated and declined to return to her position. The Commission notes that Complainant did not request compensatory damages.

The instant appeal followed. Complainant did not make any arguments on appeal.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) provides for the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot. To determine whether the issues raised in complainant's complaint are moot, the factfinder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said with assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998). When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

In the instant case, the Agency withdrew the letter of termination when it became apparent that associates were confused about the proper procedures regarding the store scratch-off coupons. Complainant was given all back pay and benefits to which she was entitled, as well as offered her position back. However, she had already relocated with her military spouse. Complainant did not seek compensatory damages. As such, the Commission agrees that the matter is moot.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 15, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120121452

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120121452