Bobby L. Cline, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 21, 2012
0120123168 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 21, 2012)

0120123168

12-21-2012

Bobby L. Cline, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.


Bobby L. Cline,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120123168

Agency No. 4G-320-0163-12

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated July 25, 2012, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Clerk at the Agency's Destin, Florida Post Office.

On July 12, 2012, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

1. in May 2012, he learned that Postal Support Employees (PSE) have been off on Saturdays and Sundays when in June 2011 his position with Saturdays and Sundays off was abolished; and

2. in April 2012, he was informed that management would abolish, change or rebid the clerk jobs in the Destin and Miami Beach offices.

The Agency dismissed claim 1 for stating the same claims that was raised in a prior EEO complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). Specifically, the Agency found that this claim raises the same matter in Agency Case No. 4G-320-0051-11.

The Agency also dismissed claim 2 for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). Specifically, the Agency determined that Complainant failed to allege he suffered a personal loss or harm to a term, condition or privilege of his employment.

The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Claim 2

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part, that an Agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. An Agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

The Agency correctly determined that Complainant has not alleged a personal loss or harm regarding a term, condition or privilege of his employment. There is no allegation that Complainant was disciplined or subjected to any adverse personnel action as a result of the alleged events. Moreover, the alleged Agency action is not of a type reasonably likely to deter Complainant or others from engaging in prior protected activity. Lindsey v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05980410 (November 4, 1999) (citing EEOC Compliance Manual, No. 915.003 (May 20, 1998).

Claim 1

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides for the dismissal of a complaint that states the same claims that is pending before or has been decided by the Commission or the Agency. To be dismissed as the "same claim," the present formal complaint and prior complaints must have involved identical matters. It has long been established that "identical" does not mean "similar." The Commission has consistently held that in order from a formal complaint to be dismissed as identical, the elements of the complaint must be identical to the elements of the prior complaint in time, place, incident, and parties. See Jackson v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 01955890 (April 5, 1996).

In the prior complaint cited by the Agency (Agency No. 4G-320-0051-11), Complainant claimed that he was discriminated against on the basis of age when:

On June 29, 2011, his position was abolished, and his job duties and days off were changed.

The Agency issued a decision on June 12, 2012, finding no discrimination. On appeal, the Commission affirmed the Agency's finding of no discrimination. Cline v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 0120122860 (December 5, 2012).

The Agency properly dismissed claim 1 for stating the same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the Agency or Commission. A fair reading of the record reflects that the matter raised in claim 1 is merely an elaboration of the matter identified in Agency No. 4G-320-0051-11.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the Agency's final decision, dismissing claim 2 for failure to state a claim, claim 1 on the grounds that it state the same claim raised in a prior complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 21, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120123168

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120123168

5

0120123168