Besser Manufacturing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 7, 194136 N.L.R.B. 764 (N.L.R.B. 1941) Copy Citation In the Matter of BESSER MANUFACTURING COMPANY and UNITED CON- STRUCTION WORKERS ORGANIZING COMMITTEE , AFFILIATED WITH THE C. I. O. Case No. R-3087.-Decided November 7, 1941 Jurisdiction : plane pallett stripper, concrete mixer, and accessory manufactur- ing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: re- fusal to accord union recognition until certification by the Board ; election necessary. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : all production and' maintenance employees excluding supervisory and clerical employees , salesmen , plant pro- tection employees , and temporary workers engaged in constructing new addition to plant ; agreement as to. Mr. Lawrence Filburn, of Detroit, Mich., for the Union. Mr. Jesse H. Besser, of Alpena, Mich., for the Company. Mr. Wm. F. Scharnikow, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On September 11, 1941, the United Construction Workers Organiz- ing Committee, affiliated with the C. I. 0., herein called the Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Seventh Region (Detroit, Michigan) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Besser Manu- facturing Company, Alpena, Michigan, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On September 23, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act, and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulation's-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional. Director to. conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. 36 N. L. R. B., No. 157. 764 BESSER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 765 On October 3,, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Com- pany and the Union. Pursuant to notice a hearing was held on October 8, 1941, at Alpena, Michigan, before Harry N. Casselman, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Company and the Union were represented and participated in the hearing.. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross- examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made a ruling on an objection to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the ruling of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The ruling is hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Bess'er Manufacturing Company is a Michigan corporation with its main plant and principal office at Alpena, Michigan, and is engaged in the manufacture of plane pallett strippers, concrete mixers, and accessories. In the year immediately preceding the hearing, the Com- pany purchased raw materials (steel, pig iron, and coke) and machin- ery valued in excess of $155,000, of which approximately 75 per cent came from outside the State of Michigan. In the same period, the Company's finished products were of a value in excess of $600,000. About 50 per cent, by value, of such products were shipped to points outside the State of Michigan. The Company concedes that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED United Construction Workers Organizing Committee is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company and the Union stipulated that a question concerning representation exists in that the Company, in answer to the Union's request for recognition, refuses to recognize any labor organization as exclusive bargaining representative of the Company's employees until a representative is certified by the Board. A statement of the Trial Examiner at the hearing shows that the Union represents a 766 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.'. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE-QUESTION' CONCERNING REPRESENTATION,'UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade., traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT . The Company and the Union stipulated, and we find, that all main- tenance and production employees at the, Company's plant in Alpena, .Michigan, excluding -supervisory and office employees, salesmen, and plant-protection employees, and excluding also temporary workers 2 employed in the construction of a new addition to the plant, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, and that said unit will insure to employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining, and other- wise effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question which has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of the Company can best be resolved by an election by secret ballot. The parties stipulated that eligibility to vote be determined by the pay roll of the Company for the period ending August 21, 1941. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, we shall direct that the persons eligible to participate in the election shall be the employees in the appropriate unit who worked for the Company during the pay-roll period ending August 21, 1941, subject to such limitations and additions as are set forth in the Direction. ' The Trial Examiner's statement shows that 82 cards applying for membership in the Union were submitted, of which 7 were dated between August 10, 1941, and September 15, 1941, and 75 were undated. Of the 82 cards, 80 appear to bear genuine signatures . Sixty- three of these 80 apparently genuine signatures are names of persons listed on the Com- .pany's pay roll of August 21, 1941, which was submitted in evidence . The pay roll indicates there are 124 in the appropriate unit. z Approximately 12 in number. a BEISS'E !R MANUFACTURING COMPANY 767 Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation' of -employees of Besser Manufacturing Company, Alpena, Michigan, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 _(6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. All maintenance and production employees at the Company's plant in Alpena, Michigan, excluding supervisory and office employees, salesmen, and plant-protection employees, and excluding also tempo- rary workers employed in the construction of a new addition to the plant, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Besser Manufacturing Company, Alpena, Michigan, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direc- tion and supervision of the Regional Director for the Seventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all maintenance and production employees Who worked for the Company at its plant in Alpena, Michigan, during the pay-roll period ending on August 21, 1941, including employees who did not work dur- ing such pay-roll period because they were. ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding supervisory and office employees, salesmen, plant- protection employees, temporary workers employed in the construction of a new addition to the plant, and those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Construction Workers Organizing Com- mittee, affiliated with the C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation