Belden Manufacturing Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 11, 1944

55 N.L.R.B. 413 (N.L.R.B. 1944)

In the Matter of BELDEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY and UNITED ELEC-
TRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS or AMERICA, CIO
Case No. 13-R-22,35.-Decided March 11, 1944
Pope & Ballard, by Mr. John H. Thomson, of Chicago, Ill.; and
Messrs. Charles S. Craigmile and Charles 0. Roberts, of Chicago, Ill.,
for the Company.
Mr. Irving Krane, of Chicago, Ill., for the U. E.
Mr. John Gavin, of Chicago, Ill., for the Operating Engineers.
Mr. Robert E. Tillman, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon petition duly filed by United Electrical, Radio and Machine
Workers of America, CIO, herein called the U. E., alleging that a ques-
tion affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of
employees of Belden Manufacturing Company, Chicago, Illinois,
herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board pro-
vided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before John R. Hill,
Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Chicago, Illinois, on
January 24, 1944. The Company, the U. E., and International Union
of Operating Engineers, Local 399, herein called the Operating
Engineers, appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity
to be heard, to examine and cross examine witnesses, and to introduce
evidence bearing on the issues. The rulings of the Trial Examiner
made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby
affirmed. All parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with
the Board.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following :
FINDINGS or FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Belden Manufacturing Company, an Illinois corporation, owns and
operates two plants where it is engaged in the manufacture of insulated
55 N. L. R. B., No. 76.
413
414 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
copper wire. Only its plant in Chicago, Illinois, is involved in this
proceeding. The principal raw materials used by the Company con-
sist of copper, enamel, silk, and cotton. During the year 1943, at its
Chicago plant, the Company used raw materials having a value in
excess of $500,000, of which approximately 50 percent was shipped to
the plant from points outside the State of Illinois. During the same
period, the Company manufactured finished products at this plant
having a value in excess of $1,000,000, of which 50 percent was shipped
to points outside the State of Illinois. The Company admits that in
the operations of its Chicago plant it is engaged in commerce, within
the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America is a
labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organiza-
tions, admitting to membership employees of the Company.
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 399, is a labor
organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admit-
ting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On or about December 23, 1943, the U. E. wrote the Company a
letter requesting recognition as the exclusive collective bargaining
representative of the latter's production employees. On or about De-
cember 30, 1943, the Company mailed a reply letter in which it ex-
pressed doubt as to the U. E.'s majority claims and for that reason
declined to bargain.
A statement of a Field Examiner of the Board, introduced into evi-
dence at the hearing, indicates that the U. E. represents a substantial
number of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate.,,
1 The Field Examiner stated that there were approximately 400 employees in the unit
claimed to be appropriate ; that the U . E submitted 206 authorization cards ; and that the
cards', except for 22 which were undated, were dated in November and December 1943 and
January 1944.
At the hearing, the Company noted that the authorization cards submitted by the U. E.
had not been checked with actual signatures of the Company ' s employees, that certain of
the cards were undated or dated subsequent to the petition and hence should not be counted,
and that the remaining cards fell short of a 50 percent showing of representation which the
Company contended should be required before an election is ordered at a plant engaged in
war production. We find no merit in any of the above objections voiced by the Company.
We have frequently stated that authorization or membership cards are required not as
proof of the precise number of employees who desire to be represented by a labor organiza-
tion, or as a basis for determining the appropriate representative , but simply to provide a
reasonable safeguard against the indiscriminate institution of representation proceedings
by labor organizations which might have little or no membership in the unit claimed to be
appropriate See Matter of H. G. Hill Stores , Inc. Warehouse , 39 N. L R. B 874, 876, and
cases cited therein . The cards submitted by the U. E constitute prima facie proof that the
U. E.'s representation of employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate is substantial
Comparison of the signatures appearing on the cards with the actual signatures of em-
BELDEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 415
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
As brought out at the hearing, the U. E. seeks a unit of all pro-
duction and maintenance employees of the Company, including the
set-tip operator in the magnet department, and janitors, but excluding
supervisory employees, office and clerical employees, guards, and
professional engineers.
The Company agrees that an industrial unit is appropriate but is
in disagreement with the U. E. as to the exclusion from the unit of
several classifications of employees which are discussed below.
The Operating Engineers makes no claim respecting an appropriate
unit, inasmuch as it asserts an interest in only one employee of the
Company. As to this employee, however, the Operating Engineers
desires that he be excluded from the unit sought by the U. E.
Timekeepers: The Company employs five timekeepers, all of whom
are paid on an hourly basis, are located in the plant, and are responsi-
ble directly to the general foreman. They are engaged entirely in
clerical work, which involves, for the most part, the maintaining of
time records. The Company contends that they should be included
in the unit; the U. E. would exclude them. Since the work of the
timekeepers is entirely clerical, and their contact with the production
and maintenance employees appears to be very slight, we are of the
opinion that their duties and interest are not sufficiently akin to those
of the production and maintenance employees to warrant their in-
clusion within the same bargaining unit.2 Accordingly, we shall
exclude them.
Tag and record clerks: There are 10 or 11 tag and record clerks
located in partitioned-off offices in the plant. They are hourly paid
employees under the supervision of the general foreman who are in
charge of production records. It is their duty to follow orders. Some
of them go out into the plant with machine tags and records. The
Company contends that they should be included in the unit, whereas
the U. E. would exclude them. Although the work of the tag and
ployees is deemed unnecessary See Matter of Ellicott Machine Corporation . 54 N L R B.
732. As respects the dates appealing on the cards, we find no valid reason foi reject-
ing cards signed after a petition has been filed . If the 22 cards which are undated are not
counted, the representation showing of the U. E. is still substantial Moreover, it appears
in this case that organization of the Company's plant did not begin prior to November 1943,
so that the undated cards are probably of recent oiigln Finally, our experience has indi-
cated that the requitement of a substantial showing rather than a 50 percent showing of
representation is adequate protection against the indisciiiiiinate institution of representa-
tion proceedings.
S See Matter of Aluminum Forgings , Inc., et al., 53 N. L. R. B. 1054.
416 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
record clerks is also entirely clerical, their contact with the production
employees is greater than is that of the timekeepers. For this reason
we shall include tag and record clerks in the unit.
Inspectors and process inspectors: The Company's inspection force
Is generally divisible into two groups : 10 inspectors, and 10 process
inspectors. All are hourly paid and are under the supervision of the
chief inspector.
(1) The inspectors perform their functions after the wire has been
manufactured and wound on spools. Approximately eight of them
work in the label department and two in the stranding department.
Their duties are routine, consisting of surface inspection. All wire
found to be defective is set aside. Three or four of the inspectors
rewind wire. Another performs routine spot checks in the inspection
laboratory. The Company would include all the inspectors. The
U. E. agrees that all but the inspector in the laboratory should be
included; it would exclude the latter employees solely because of her
location in the laboratory. We do not deem this to be sufficient reason
to justify treating this employee any differently than the other in-
spectors. We, shall, therefore, include all the inspectors in the unit.
(2) All the process inspectors, with the exception of one who is em-
ployed in the inspection laboratory, are assigned to production de-
partments where they inspect manufacturing operations and make
constant tests. If they discover defective wire, they have authority
to stop production. Approximately seven of them are also referred
to as department inspectors because each of them is the only inspector
in a particular department on a given shift. The Company contends
that all process inspectors should be included in the unit; the U. E.
world exclude those who are designated as department inspectors and
the one who works in the laboratory. All the process inspectors per-
form comparable functions. Those who are also known as depart-
ment inspectors and the process inspector in the laboratory receive a
week's vacation with pay after 1 year's service, whereas the others must
first have 3 years' service.3 Infrequently, some of the process inspectors
who are termed department inspectors will supervise a department in
the absence of the foreman, but when so acting, merely watch over the
work in the department while continuing their regular inspection
duties. We do not find that any of the process inspectors exercise
supervisory powers warranting their exclusion from the unit. We
further find that our conclusion as to the inspector in the laboratory is
equally applicable to the process inspector in the laboratory. More-
over, we are of the opinion that the work of process inspectors and
inspectors is basically so similar that if one group is included in a
3Inspectors and production and maintenance employees must also have 3 years' service
before being entitled to a week's vacation with pay
BELDEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 417
production and maintenance unit, the other should likewise be
included. We shall, therefore, include all process inspectors in
the unit.
Cafeteria employees: The Company has two cafeterias, one in the
office building and the other in the plant. The U. E. would exclude
the employees in both cafeterias, whereas the Company would exclude
only those in the office cafeteria. There are five or six employees in
the plant cafeteria, consisting of a cook and kitchen and lunchroom
helpers. Because the work of cafeteria employees is not related to that
of production and maintenance employees, we shall exclude them from
the unit.
Plant nurse: The Company employs one nurse, who is located in the
First-Aid Room. The Company would include her in the unit and
the U. E. would exclude her. Inasmuch as she is not engaged in pro-
duction or maintenance work, and in view of the specialized character
of her services, we shall exclude the plant nurse from the unit.
Salaried rewind inspector; salaried mechanic; and experimental
machine operator: These three employees, because of their long terms
of service, are on a salaried basis. The Company contends that they
should be included in the unit; the U. E. would exclude them.
(1) The salaried rewind inspector is located in the label room where
she makes spot checks of spooled wire and is under the supervision of
the forelady of the label room. She sets aside bad spools of wine. Her
duties are thus substantially the same as hourly paid inspectors, whom
we have included in the unit. We shall, therefore, include the salaried
rewind inspector.
(2) The salaried mechanic is located in the machine shop where,
because of his greater skills and experience, he performs more difficult
and finer work than other mechanics. Since his work is otherwise the
same as the hourly paid employees in the machine shop, we shall
include him also.
(3) The experimental machine operator is situated in the magnet
wire division. Her work differs from other machine operators only
in that she runs samples on various machines to see that they are ready
for production, instead of performing straight production work.
Also, because of her greater experience, she advises other employees
who encounter difficulty in the performance of their work. She huts no
supervisory powers. We shall include her.
Chief boiler room engineer: This employee is the only one in whom
the Operating Engineers claims an interest. Although his title might
indicate otherwise, he has no one under his supervision. He alone
cares for the boiler room and checks air compression. He has been
a member of the Operating Engineers for 2 years. The Company
contends that he should be included in the unit. The Operating Engi-
578129-44-vol . 55--28
418 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
neers requests the Board to exclude him. The position of the U. E.
is that it has no objection to excluding hum, and that if he is included,
it would allow the Operating Engineers to bargain for him. In
view of the positions of the only two labor organizations involved and
the employee's membership in a clearly identifiable and highly skilled
craft, we find that the policies of the Act will best be effectuated by
excluding him from the production and maintenance unit.
We find that all production and maintenance employees of the
Company, including the set-up operator in the magnet department,
janitors, tag and record clerks, inspectors, process inspectors, the sal-
aried rewind inspector in the label department, the salaried mechanic
in the machine shop, and the experimental machine operator in the
magnet wire division, but excluding office and clerical employees 4
guards, professional engineers, timekeepers, cafeteria employees, the
plant nurse, the chief boiler room engineer, and all supervisory em-
ployees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or other-
wise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recom-
mend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of
collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the
Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-
roll period immediately preceding the date of our Direction of
Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth
therein.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act,
and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Belden Manu-
facttjring Company, Chicago, Illinois, an election by secret ballot shall
be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days
from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision
of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this
matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject
' The U. E and the Company agreed that this category has reference to all employees in
the office building , two employment clef ks in the plant , and the secretary to the plant
superintendent.
BELDEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 419
to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among
the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who
were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the
date of this direction, including employees who did not work during
said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily
laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United
States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding
any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been
rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine
whether or not they desire to be represented by United Electrical, Radio
and Machine Workers of America, CIO, for the purposes of collective
bargaining.
MR. JOHN M. HOUSTON took no part in the consideration of the above
Decision and Direction of Election.