Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsDec 30, 194459 N.L.R.B. 1346 (N.L.R.B. 1944) Copy Citation In the Matter of ATLANTIC BASIN IRON WORKS, INC., and INDUSTRIAL UNION OF MARINE & SHIPBUILDING WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 39, C. I. O. Case No. 2-R-5094.-Decided December 30, 194 .Mr. Frank B. Devlin, of New York City, for the Company. Mr. William J. Cosgrove, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for the Union. Mr. Harold M. Humphreys, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by Industrial Union of Marine & Ship- building Workers of America, Local 39, C. I. 0., herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concern- ing the representation of employees of Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc., Brooklyn, New York, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Jerome I. Macht, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at New York City on November 29, 1944. The Union appeared and participated., All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evi- dence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc., is a New York corporation which repairs, equips, and maintains vessels engaged in domestic and for- eign commerce, and which operates its yards in Brooklyn, New York. 1 No representative of the Company appeared at the hearing . However, the Company filed a written answer by which it appeared specially in the proceeding. 59 N. L. R. B., No. 246. 1346 - ATLANTIC BASIN IRON WORKS, INC. 1347 During 1943, its purchases of raw materials were in excess of $17-- 500,000, over 30 percent of which was shipped to the Company from without the State of New, York. In 1943 the Company repaired,- equipped, or converted more than 12 steamships of over 10,000 tons capacity.2 In its answer the Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America, Local 39, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION In October 1944, the Union requested recognition as the exclusive bargaining representative of the Company's office clerical employees. The Company did not accede to this request. The Company contends in its answer that, since it has a contract with the Union covering production and maintenance workers, but specifically excluding office clerical employees, the Board has no power to entertain the petition herein, which alleges as appropriate a unit of office clerical employees. This contract, dated August 11, 1942, is in evidence, and nothing in it constitutes an undertaking by the Union not to represent the Company's office clerical employees. Accordingly, we find that no bar exists to a determination of repre- sentation 3 •A statement of a Boa'rd'-agent, introduced into evidence at the-hear- ing, indicates that the Union 'represents a substantial number of em- ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.4 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of'the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT In accordance with the unopposed request of the Union,5 and upon the entire record in the case, we find that all office clerical em- 2 These findings are based upon the facts set forth in the Board's Decision in Matter of Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc, 56 N I. R. B 126. 'See -Matter of Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc , 56 N L R B 126 ' The Field Examiner-reported that the Union submitted 46 application for membership cards dated September and October 1344, and that there are approximately 83 employees in the alleged appropriate unit . 5 Except for its contention concerning the Board's power in this proceeding, set forth in Section III, supra, the Company takes no position with respect to the appropriate unit. 1348 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD - ployees of the Company, including clerks, messengers, International Business Machine operators, blockers, key punch operators, tabula- tors, telephone switchboard operators, and stenographers, but, ex- cluding confidential secretaries, timekeepers, control sheet employees, snappers, and executive department heads with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise -effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were.employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by- Section 9 (c) of the National-Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain represent- atives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Atlantic Basin Iron Works, Inc., Brooklyn, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above,, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be repre- sented by Industrial Union of Marine & ,Shipbuilding Workers of America, Local 39, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation